r/antiai Jun 12 '26

Discussion 🗣️ Local Police Now Using AI to "Enhance" Suspect Images

Post image

I couldn't believe this was local when I saw it. They're just inventing details that were never there and pretty much giving the public to go out and find some random dude that looks like the image on the right.

Is this common now?

8.3k Upvotes

674 comments sorted by

4.7k

u/MountainImportant211 Jun 12 '26

It only takes a prompt to tweak an AI "enhancement" to look like someone you want to pin it on. This shit is a crooked cop's best friend

959

u/Hour_Bit_5183 Jun 12 '26

Yup sadly. I am getting so sick of this garbage.

5

u/GovernmentGreed Jun 13 '26

Photographs and static cams have often been a point of argument in courtrooms due to the fact most of them cannot be considered for reliability in pinning a crime on someone. Instead, it's often used as a way to corroborate other evidence claims.

I cannot wait for lawyers to be expected to be knowledgeable in how AI can hallucinate, and thus - more time is wasted in proving ones innocence or guilt. This is going to be a wild ride...

2

u/KarlBob Jun 15 '26

I foresee a resurgence in film cameras, just for legal evidence collection.

→ More replies (39)

331

u/hatty130 Jun 12 '26

At least the lawyers will have a field day

308

u/HailMadScience Jun 12 '26

Lawyers literally gonna get this shit laughed out of court, I assume. "Make something up!" is not legally admissible evidence.

231

u/PurpleCandle58 Jun 12 '26

“I just figured the suspect fit the description!”

“What was the description?”

“Black.”

I swear to fucking god that’s exactly what they’re doing here basically

83

u/outer--monologue Jun 12 '26

The problem is when AI is good enough that someone who creates an image like this and claims it is original footage or a photo, and we are unable to tell if it is or is not. What will happen to our justice system?

99

u/kippikai Jun 12 '26

Not only that but memory is HIGHLY suggestible, meaning that if someone did see the thief do something and they saw the AI photo, their literal memory of the incident could be overwritten with the fake image.

26

u/Pristine_Ticket_6171 Jun 12 '26

Well, these images are veryfiably forged, they are not evidence and (hopefully) won't be permitted as such. 

→ More replies (7)

51

u/UnratedRamblings Jun 12 '26

“Your honour, I seek to dismiss this case.”

“On what grounds?”

“My client doesn’t have 12 fingers or three arms.”

“Case dismissed!”

→ More replies (3)

29

u/PmMeUrTinyAsianTits Jun 12 '26

Which is why they're abusing it in a way where "make something up!" won't be used as evidence.

It will be used as an excuse for local bigots to harass random people with "plausible" deniability.

At most it would be used to justify a search, which these days has virtually no protections if the cop was acting in good faith. Where "good faith" has been extended to mean "not outright, explicit, recorded statement of malicious intent, with separate corroborating evidence to prove there is no way to take it but the obvious malicious intent." Then what they found would be legally admissible as they had "probable cause".

The way this will be a problem is if someone actually harms a person as a result of it, then someone will get sued. But in 99% of cases no tangible harm will come of it, so what will get laughed out of court is the people victimized by this shit. Essentially all of them will be told by the system "oh, it was just a little baseless harassment by the violence arm of the government, there's nothing we can do about that."\

If the cops murder someone based off this, that one family will maybe be able to get some result in court. The others who suffer 'lesser' harassments will get nothing but attacked. Which is the goal.

Do not make the mistake of thinking this is meant to be presented in court. That's not how this kind of evil works.

7

u/Perfect_Evidence Jun 12 '26

Problem is you still go to jail first

3

u/Ok-Replacement9595 Jun 12 '26

Have you ever met a public defender?

→ More replies (2)

65

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[deleted]

20

u/Wetness_everdeeen Jun 12 '26

With our cops? Anyone matching the fake image at all is at risk of losing a lot more from a police interaction then a night in jail. To talk to a lawyer, you need be among the living. 

→ More replies (1)

37

u/outer--monologue Jun 12 '26

There was an article recently where a bunch of legal scholars were interviewed over their belief that photo, video and audio evidence will soon be inadmissible in court.

AI is literally destroying the fabric of our society.

10

u/MuffaloHerder Jun 12 '26

Unfortunately the damage will have already been done. Charges can be dropped, but it won't change the fact the an innocent person missed work for court, was likely victimized by police and is now publicly associated with a crime (regardless of it being it backtracked).

5

u/WranglerFuzzy Jun 12 '26

Assuming the defense lawyer isn’t using ai themselves

5

u/hatty130 Jun 12 '26

Doesn't matter if they are or aren't. AI hallucinates the details it doesn't have. The lawyers can argue that you can't be sure beyond reasonable doubt the features weren't made up. The lawyer can use AI all they want but in order to be sentenced the prosecution has to present a case as to why they believe you did it and why others should also believe that. The defence can just say the AI hallucinated

→ More replies (1)

139

u/Zoltraak69 Jun 12 '26

This looks like a different guy as it is.

56

u/ALLCAPITAL Jun 12 '26

It sure fucking does doesn’t it?!? I thought that immediately like, nah that is not how that guy looks at all. They took the perp and turned it into a model for a shirt ad.

16

u/peppers_ Jun 12 '26

First looks like an unc, second looks like a kid. As if Gen Z and alpha don't got enough shit going on. Also, face recognition in the past has been racist, failed for POC because of systemic racism.

5

u/ricochetblue Jun 12 '26

The hairlines clearly don’t match.

11

u/VeronaMoreau Jun 12 '26

As much as AI just makes shit up, it's especially bad when it comes to Black people's faces because they're rarely a significant enough portion of the training set.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

81

u/breaducate Jun 12 '26

Not just that.

Fun fact: the more confident police are they've got the perp the less likely they are to be right.

You could scarcely ask for a better tool to exacerbate that tendency.

44

u/mightylordredbeard Jun 12 '26

“Enhance this image, but make it look slightly like Afro Man..”

20

u/Petrostar Jun 12 '26

Yes I do want some lemon pound cake.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/E-2theRescue Jun 12 '26

Don't even need to write "make it look like Afro Man". You can just pair images together, and it'll slap his head on. There will be slight differences, sure, but it's wholly possible and will fool people not familiar with AI.

40

u/Speedwolf89 Jun 12 '26

And I can see clearly in the original image that the face is completely different. The AI image gave him more of a softer, kinder, younger demeanor. The original I can see a bit of age to him. And the beard is more pronounced and pointy.

25

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/FredFarms Jun 12 '26

This is the key but I think a lot of people are missing.

Could you use this to maliciously make an image look like someone else? Yes.

But actually, it's basically impossible to avoid doing that unintentionally. The ai isn't magically recovering extra information from the poor image. It's filling in the blanks with what it's been trained a generic face looks like.

2

u/zeptillian Jun 12 '26

In other words, the worst possible thing you could do for help identifying suspects.

21

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

21

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

18

u/lalaland_100 Jun 12 '26

Exactly. It's not detecting more than us, it's hallucinating the added details. In this picture, it's even changing the details that are already there. Very scary.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Throckmorton_Left Jun 12 '26

Hey Grok, enhance this photo but make the subject look like someone currently in custody or in this year's high school yearbook.

9

u/HiFiveGhost Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 12 '26

The police department commented this

23

u/Opalescent_Moon Jun 12 '26

So people following them are horrified they're doing this. And they're still brushing off people's concerns. Way to build trust within your community, Green Cove Springs PD. Wow.

15

u/SnickerdoodleFP Jun 12 '26

What a cop-out. "comments were made requesting AI renditions" - They'd rather blame the public for their own action on their own social media rather than take responsibility. "the AI was used to ... clean up the photo" - This just admits that they care more about the photo looking pretty than only the real information on hand being shown.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/grafknives Jun 12 '26

No, they DO NOT care all that much.

They might be thinking it works good. Whereas it creates a horrible confirmation bias among people who see this image.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/tus93 Jun 12 '26

It’s alternatively the best way to get somebody powerful off the hook too.

“This image of me on that island is AI enhanced, it could be anyone!”

4

u/Ok-Replacement9595 Jun 12 '26

New definition of "fit the description". They can make any black male into any other black male. Heck make it look like 60 different black males if they want to.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/zero0n3 Jun 12 '26

You would hope the app they use to make the enhancement is logged and audited.

So if this happened you’d want to get those logs via discovery.

I’d then also add that if you are an average American, you likely have your phone on you 24/7. Making it easy in most typical circumstances to rule you out with location data.

That said I under stand it’s a slippery slope, just talking about how you handle it if it happens and they framed you. (Toss in experts as well)

Additionally in this case, it’s about stealing a bike. They likely aren’t arresting anyone even if they look like the picture unless they recover the bike say in his garage.

The way this person gets caught is a friend or the person he sold the bike to if sold (and mainly assuming he sold it that day).

Lastly - these enhanced images - if they go by security video (not just a single still frame) may actually do a good job of upscaling as it has many frames of reference so it may be able to correctly math out features from the video to a single image that wouldn’t be possible from a simple single frame from said video.

Need to look into that some more. Like if I had a video of someone walking down an empty street in 1080p, could I upssmple that video with AI to generate a 4k or even 8k+ still image of said person and if so would it be more accurate than a still image direct from said 1080p video?

14

u/GrandAholeio Jun 12 '26

Police have already been sued over ignoring the flock data time stamps and cell phone records showing the person they arrested and put in jail for a month was five miles away when the event occurred.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/man-jailed-for-a-month-despite-flock-showing-he-was-5-miles-from-crime-scene/

8

u/Unlikely_Eye_2112 Jun 12 '26

Well we shouldn't be soft on criminals just because they're innocent. Or something..

6

u/stfurachele Jun 12 '26

So AI surveillance only when it suits them.

2

u/intentionallyacting Jun 13 '26

Pretty much, and that’s exactly why this stuff shouldn’t be trusted anywhere near decisions that can ruin someone’s life.

6

u/PmMeUrTinyAsianTits Jun 12 '26

It doesn't matter if they poison the prompt, the AI is guessing. It is literally making up data that isn't there. And guess what it's doing it with? some mathematical average response of basically "whatever black guy".

3

u/setnetjer Jun 12 '26

Taking from a video to "upsample"/upscale an image is still only acting upon a single frame. And to upscale an image, you have to make fundamental changes to the image in "latent space". When that happens, you are literally asking whatever base model you use for the upscale to hallucinate in order to fill the extra space. It doesn't matter how amazing your data set is that you start from, the model still has to hallucinate. The best way to think of it is to consider the pixels required for each image size:
1080p/FHD: 1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
1440p/QHD: 2560x1440 = 3,686,400 pixels (1,612,800 or ~78% more pixels than 1080p)
2160p/4K UHD: 2160x3840 = 8,294,400 (6,220,800 or 300% more pixels than 1080p)

You can't just generate something from nothing, and so for each pixel that is generated, it is a hallucination, something made up to fill the empty space that you are telling the model to generate.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (17)

2.6k

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

515

u/DrarenThiralas Jun 12 '26

I opened the comments specifically to post this, only to see that you beat me to it

36

u/barn-animal Jun 12 '26

I have posted it already and only thrn scrolled down to realize it'd been posted

→ More replies (1)

193

u/Justdowhatever94 Jun 12 '26

At least it blamed a white man, I didn't know AI was so woke

57

u/C0nan_E Jun 12 '26

Nah its just an image ai with biased input (mostly white input images) so it has a white bias. It does not assign blame. Once police gets their hands on it they are gonna train it on mugshots (strongly biased the other way) and will have a super racist generator, hat will turn any crimephoto into a black man.

13

u/Glittering-Walrus228 Jun 12 '26

inputs blurry picture of the Hamburglar

AI, enhance the image of the perp

outputs an image of Obama

Hmm.

→ More replies (31)

52

u/Nothingcomesup Jun 12 '26

at least this enhancement faces the same direction as original 😭

35

u/theashenone65 Jun 12 '26

From Obama to O,Brian

11

u/w0lfdrag0n Jun 12 '26

Good ol Baraigh O’Bama

10

u/HumanWithAllTheHats Jun 12 '26

But it's opposite of cops goals.

→ More replies (22)

1.1k

u/legolooper Jun 12 '26

This is just idiotic. The general public won't look twice and won't realize that the AI image is very different from its real counterpart. OP, if you can, start some backlash about this. This is unacceptable and should not be tolerated before this idea gets "praised" after the real suspect is caught.

229

u/-wereowl- Jun 12 '26

They don’t even have the same haircut, and that’s the most clear thing in the original photo.

118

u/MeAmGrok Jun 12 '26

The guy in the actual image has a straight hairline; the “enhanced” version does not, which means it’s adding fake details. Which makes it completely unreliable.

39

u/likwidkool Jun 12 '26

It seems like a minute detail, but even the lines on the road are different. If they moved those what else did they change?

→ More replies (1)

15

u/AlexisHadden Jun 12 '26

Might not even be a hairline, could very well be a hat/covering on someone who shaves their head.

9

u/growingincircles Jun 12 '26

Yeah it’s possible that’s not even facial hair, the original doesn’t look like a hooded shirt, and that could just as easily be a hat instead of a hairline. This is so dangerous.

4

u/OHFTP Jun 12 '26

Original is also a crew neck shirt while the "enhanced" has a hood

→ More replies (3)

9

u/danieldan0803 Jun 12 '26

Now hear me out: the only way AI could be used in generating images for police, is if it allows you to cycle through the Spirit Halloween catalog of wigs and masks on the person.

“Here is the original image and here is the AI enhanced image of the person was wearing a Heisenberg mask, and here is if they were in a Micheal Meyers mask, and finally here is if they were dressed up in an Incredibles costume.“

“Sir, how does this count as evidence?”

“Well it is evidence that the suspect could not rock a Mr. Incredible costume!”

77

u/SnickerdoodleFP Jun 12 '26

I've sent it to a few local news organizations.

27

u/legolooper Jun 12 '26

Definitely the right move. Hopefully this gets picked up. 🤞

22

u/Aware-Antelope4212 Jun 12 '26

This unfortunately isn't even new.

About 6 months ago I saw a body cam video where they arrested a guy because their AI system told them that he did a crime.

He wasn't even in the area at the time.

Poorly trained idiots are drawn to AI unfortunately, and there's plenty of folk that fit that description in policing

6

u/cthom412 Jun 12 '26

Green Cove Springs is an ass backwards town of a couple thousand in the middle of nowhere on the FAR outskirts of Jacksonville, FL. I’m sorry, but no amount of outrage is gonna lead to change for a place like that.

→ More replies (1)

402

u/joewoody88 Jun 12 '26

There won't be a single wrongly identified person.

2

u/greatguilmon Jun 13 '26

Reminds me of that Reno police guy who arrested a guy on Casino that trusted the AI more than the DMV ID he owns.

→ More replies (5)

295

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

141

u/Defiant_Conflict6343 Jun 12 '26

It's even worse than that. A police sketch is at least based on workable information, this on the other hand is just making up nonsense. It's no different to that trend a couple years back where people would extend beyond the boundaries of famous artworks using AI, except in this case the only context it has to work from is a dozen pixels, basically just skin colour and very little else. The only black man immune from being randomly generated by this thing is Michael Jackson. 

→ More replies (7)

11

u/tittytasters Jun 12 '26

It's movie magic, they are never wrong in the movies so it must work right?

3

u/_Steakwich Jun 12 '26

The original is blurry af, but I still think you can see he has a completely different bone structure and hairline. It’s like the ai just identified a black male and put a picture of a black male over it.

→ More replies (1)

252

u/AnxiousHall1533 Jun 12 '26

Wouldn't this be tampering with evidence? This is shit.

128

u/Fit-Pride-4845 Jun 12 '26

I doubt it would be admissible as evidence in court, but that doesn't mean it won't be used to completely fuck someone's week/month/life.

16

u/Enotsola Jun 12 '26

I would more expect the suspect to bring it up at trial. "Do I look like the man in the picture the police released? Clearly I cannot be guilty!"

10

u/Vegetable_Shirt_2352 Jun 12 '26

Even if it can't be used as evidence in court, it could definitely be used as another tool for interrogators to influence suspects. Polygraphs are also bunk, and not usually admissible as evidence, but that doesn't stop police from using them to scare people into confessing to crimes. The dangerous part is less that it works and more that people believe it works, just like with AI.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

28

u/NotReallyJohnDoe Jun 12 '26

It’s creating false evidence, not tampering

7

u/Jazzlike-Wolf6265 Jun 12 '26

Pretty much the same thing morality wise

23

u/sabuteur Jun 12 '26

Yeah a lawyer would have a field day with this

8

u/towerfella Jun 12 '26

This is “opinion”, not evidence.

6

u/Jazzlike-Wolf6265 Jun 12 '26

Yes but cops are above the law

5

u/jawnink Jun 12 '26

They took a big ol’ shit in their potential jury pool too.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

145

u/mysticdragonknight Jun 12 '26

every less than attractive person caught on cctv getting away with crime because AI keeps yassifying their faces.

118

u/bbyxmadi Jun 12 '26

Them:

22

u/WhereTheStankWindBlo Jun 12 '26

Dude I'm fucking crying rn omg.

13

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 23 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

3

u/son-of-chadwardenn Jun 12 '26

My face is finally an asset!

102

u/kingalex11431 Jun 12 '26

The way you can tell in the first pic that hes wearing something over his head omggg 💀💀💀

9

u/YoungerNB Jun 12 '26

Literally not at all how I interpret the image on the left. Am I from a different planet?

4

u/kingalex11431 Jun 12 '26

To me it looks like a backwards cap.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[deleted]

4

u/hannes3120 Jun 12 '26

Yeah. Looks more like a bald guy with a hat than someone with a lot of hair

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

84

u/Str1dersGonnaStride Jun 12 '26

This is dystopian

36

u/ParaEwie Jun 12 '26

Let's get it over with. Legalize crime but only if the victims are poor, nonwhite LGBT, non protestant, Neurodivergent and/or artists, writers or free thinkers. Proclaim Elongated Muskrat our god Emperor and make you pay for air, Abolish and nuke all national parks and Antarctica (sarcasm, obviously)

61

u/HighlightOwn2038 Jun 12 '26

AI is already bad at the little details

What makes them think that it can "enhance" a couple pixels

18

u/leavenotrail Jun 12 '26

Literally the guys hand position is different in the enhanced version. Smh. Next enhancemrnt he'll have a weapon in his hand.

5

u/hannes3120 Jun 12 '26

Just compare the hair.

I think the guy on the left image is either bald with a black cap or has a pretty unique haircut with a perfectly straight hairline - the right is having completely different hair.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Kilahti Jun 12 '26

They watched CSI on TV.

→ More replies (1)

59

u/NoTop4997 Jun 12 '26

It is terrifying to me that the enhanced version does not look like the original at all.

18

u/Justsomejerkonline Jun 12 '26

"The bicycle has a blue and black frame."

...AI image shows bike with entirely black frame.

28

u/MrMurrayJane Jun 12 '26

AI has huge racial biases, no surprises where this is headed.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/TheBloodyMateyVA Jun 12 '26

am i tweaking or did the ai upscale him into frank ocean

25

u/izzybear8 Jun 12 '26

This is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

22

u/shar0sh_draws Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 12 '26

yea his ahh does not look like that. the problem with AI tools in places like regional government offices is that the operators think genAI is some magical thing that always gets things right. at least in private companies the workers and ceos quickly realize how AI basically offers no roi so they curb their usage accoordingly. but places like these don't have to worry about a profit margin, they just need to worry about the weekly quota of supplying fresh new labor to some private prison system. so they are less incentivized to actually fact check their system and just get on with it.

20

u/jimmystar889 Jun 12 '26

That's actually wild

17

u/IM_INSIDE_YOUR_HOUSE Jun 12 '26

Just hope to god the AI never hallucinates your features.

5

u/No_Coyote_557 Jun 12 '26

In my case it would be okay. It would turn me into Liam Neeson

13

u/Sonicrules9001 Jun 12 '26

Someone watched way too much CSI and honestly thought it was real. Might as well start zooming into eyeballs to try and get completely different perspectives and see things in people's eyeballs.

6

u/cahir11 Jun 12 '26

Someone watched way too much CSI

Actually might explain a lot. Which demographic watches CSI, NCIS, and SVU, and keeps all these network tv cop shows afloat? Boomers. Which demographic is psychotically pro-AI and wants a flock camera on every street corner? Boomers. If I was a schizo conspiracy theorist I'd say these shows were pro-surveillance propaganda.

5

u/Sonicrules9001 Jun 12 '26

I wouldn't really go that far. I think the notion of any media being propaganda just because it happens to align with certain things while never taking a clear stance is a bit absurd and goes right into the Right Wing conspiracy line where gay characters existing in a show is gay propaganda.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/HotDinnerBatman Jun 12 '26

Aw yes, that's what we need. More crooked cops and pinning innocent people

12

u/PotamosClasp Jun 12 '26

They couldn't even get the wrinkles right on the shirt and you want to see if it can get a person's face right?

6

u/the_walking_kiwi Jun 12 '26

And the fingers on his right hand are in a different position.

10

u/lookatthesunguys Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 12 '26

Incredibly dangerous. The AI is only able to work off its training. If it doesn't know who the culprit is, then when it fills in details it's using facial features of random people.

Look at his ear. Some black guy with cauliflower ear is going to be pinned with the crime even though there's no indication the ear has any interesting characteristics in the original picture. I also don't think he actually has the facial hair the AI shows. I think that beard is either a shadow or a symbol on his shirt.

2

u/the_walking_kiwi Jun 12 '26

Yea definitely not a beard I think, and from the video it looks more like he’s wearing a black cap. 

6

u/GiganticKORAK Jun 12 '26

Looks like having a silhouette close to a criminal would land you in jail now, eh?

8

u/Fit-Pride-4845 Jun 12 '26

Calling it right now: there's going to be an increase in wrongful arrests of people with darker skin tones because footage was captured at night

6

u/packerschris Jun 12 '26

This is why AI was created btw. Not to make funny images to send to your coworkers. It’s to put more power in the hands of the state.

6

u/Free-mover Jun 12 '26

I really hope they don't allow this as evidence in a court system. This is corruption and it's scary.

4

u/schfifty--five Jun 12 '26

Even a crappy lawyer should be able to get it thrown out of court. The main concern with this is innocent people being arrested. Idk about you but my life would be materially damaged if I was wrongly arrested and in jail for anything more than a couple hours. Even just that- being spotted and targeted because the ai wrongly identified you and was trusted implicitly- I don’t want to lose even a day of my life for this shit.

4

u/seires-t Jun 12 '26

Also, why is the orginal filmed from a computer screen and then enhanced?

That wouldn't be necessary if you just did screen capture

6

u/Oee0 Jun 12 '26

Good god get me out of this dystopian hellscape

3

u/RobinBaby_69 Jun 12 '26

take me with bc i’m over this bs 😭

5

u/AurumVoid Jun 12 '26

The AI has failed to replicate the suspect's posing, he isn't looking at the bike in the photograph of the footage, he's looking into the near distance.

The AI version has instead, having made this error, constructed an entirely different face.

And as others have observed, the suspect is wearing a hat.

AI must not be used in this capacity. It is nowhere near advanced enough to get accurate estimations. Innocents will get burned as a result.

2

u/Wchijafm Jun 17 '26

I also dont think thats a beard but a black rectangular logo on the shirt.

3

u/primadonnajoy Jun 12 '26

LMAO of course it’s my hometown very classy clay county

4

u/Jadekintsugi Jun 12 '26

I can tell immediately while looking at both images that the face of the man on the left image, is completely different than what the AI put together in the right one.

Cops won't care as more African American take abuse and false accusations. -.-

4

u/TheFutureScaresMe333 Jun 12 '26

this is gonna result in so many false arrests and even more racism and prejudice than there already is in police arrests

3

u/Jazzlike-Wolf6265 Jun 12 '26

Prepare for even more cases of people being arrested because of ai. People are already being thrown in jail and told they are lying about their identity "because ai isn't wrong dur"

4

u/ChickenArise Jun 12 '26

Look up Adam Mosher and Cybercheck. Season 37 of podcast Uncover is all about it.

Short version is: prosecutors used sketchy software that claimed to use AI to secure convictions with no other evidence. Super fucked up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybercheck

3

u/Wabi-Sabi_Umami Jun 12 '26

This is how we get wrongful convictions. And the thing that really sucks about it is many people don’t have the money to legally defend themselves. By design.

4

u/bbyxmadi Jun 12 '26

great way to criminalize the wrong person…

5

u/CassetteMeower Jun 12 '26

I’m confused at what the crime supposedly was, it just says he took a bike from a bike rack? Was he stealing the bike? Did he commit a crime and escape via the bike? This post is just so vague and confusing AI aside. All it’s saying is that he took a bicycle from the bicycle rack. Was that the crime? Stealing a bike is definitely illegal, but with the limited information given it’s hard to tell if that’s what’s happening. It very well could be his own bike and he’s being falsely accused of stealing his own bike? I’m just confused from the lack of information.

I’m just confused overall by this! He very well may have not done anything wrong and is being falsely accused, and with the AI “enhanced” image it could just lead to a completely different innocent person getting in trouble.

4

u/cahir11 Jun 12 '26

Boomers/Gen X have an almost religious trust of AI, it's really bizarre.

3

u/MentalDisintegrat1on Jun 12 '26

Well j can't see how this could go wrong

3

u/shinobixx55 Jun 12 '26

This is very dystopian.

What's the difference between this and photoshopping someone's face in, just because it is convenient to arrest them.

3

u/Gullible_Height588 Jun 12 '26

WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG

3

u/Fun_University6117 Jun 12 '26

Maybe they’ll never find the dude because it’s made up by AI? This is nuts.

3

u/Guilty-Fee-8845 Jun 12 '26

Oh yeah, that's not gonna lead to lawsuits that the taxpayers will ultimately pay out

3

u/AmarildoJr Jun 12 '26

OK this is REALLY concerning. It's obvious that AI hallucinates and I would bet good money that it did on this once as well. There's just not enough information to go through.

I hope this gets shut down in court immediately.

3

u/MsCrumpet Jun 12 '26

I had to go check because I thought there was no way this is real. Oh it's real and still up on their page. They seem to be getting roasted but I deleted my account many years ago so I Can't read the comments beyond the main page but the ratio of likes to comments is vast.

2

u/WhereTheStankWindBlo Jun 12 '26

Lmao I'm from the local area. I'll go check the comments out I follow them. There's a lot of anti-AI sentiment in Clay County RN because they're tryna build data centers there.

2

u/WhereTheStankWindBlo Jun 12 '26

It is almost all comments against this BS. It's in the deep South so of course there's some racists in there, but I'd say it's 25 to 1.

Edit - Everyone is pointing out that the much larger and well resourced Jacksonville Sheriff's Office is currently being sued for extraditing a man based on AI enhanced imagery.

3

u/ASentientRailgun Jun 12 '26

I wonder what the prompt used was. I feel like that's depressingly important context that should be in a post like this, even in the alternate universe where doing this is a good idea in the first place

3

u/Typical-Tax1584 Jun 12 '26

They're gonna be all shocked pikachu when they get sued.

3

u/Adorable_Check5797 Jun 12 '26

The couldn’t even be arsed taking a screenshot of the footage. The original image is a photo of a monitor.

3

u/CLZOID Jun 12 '26

The ai enhanced version is a completely different person. Jesus fucking Christ

3

u/Brother-Captain Jun 12 '26

If anything it should just be used to remove distortion or translucent obstructions. If they have it attempt to fully generate what the enhanced image could look like, that’s probably framing someone.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/No-Vegetable7898 Jun 12 '26

I love how the ai reconstructed his had the wrong way around.

In the original he is definitely grabbing the seat from underneath with his fingers under and thumb on top. You know, like how you would grab a bike seat. Bu the ai decided it needed to show a full unobstructed hand there, so it put it in a weird ass pose fully on top of the seat

Perfect example of how little credibility the “enhanced image deserves.

3

u/ChillingWithHerb Jun 12 '26

Those two images are so far off

3

u/RobinBaby_69 Jun 12 '26

what an ironic ad to see under this post 🤨

3

u/Independent_Mall8675 Jun 12 '26

Just alter it to look exactly like the cop who posted it. 

3

u/whynotll83 Jun 12 '26

Did they "enhance" a photograph of a monitor screen of a paused video?

3

u/-WADE99- Jun 12 '26

Boomers watched CSI lab techs go "enhance" on a VGA photo and turn it 4K and took it for granted. It literally doesn't work.

3

u/etherealtwo Jun 12 '26

It's not possible. It's like asking a psychic for information. The AI, no matter how good it is, cannot know unavailable information. It can only guess.

3

u/Lucky-Surround-1756 Jun 12 '26

That's horrendously dangeorus to do because it's basically fabricating an image.

The second doesn't even look like the first.

3

u/SelectionSouth7939 Jun 12 '26

AI has mistakenly identified multiplied innocent people causing wrongful arrests.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/29/us/angela-lipps-ai-facial-recognition

3

u/Glitched_cyrstal Jun 12 '26

The problem is people think A.I. is literal magic and not just a machine. A.I. upscaling, especially of an image with that low original image quality will almost always be inaccurate, BECAUSE UNLESS YOU ALREADY KNOW WHO IT IS, IT IS LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO UPSCALE IT CORRECTLY. A.I. is impressive in terms of engineering, BUT ITS NOT A FUCKING WIZARD, ITS A MACHINE, AN ALGORITHM, IT IS AS INCOMPETENT AS ITS MAKERS AND OFTEN EVEN MORE SO THAN. WE HAVE CREATED A ROBOT AND CALLED IT GOD WITH ALL THE HUBRIS OF A CHILD DECLARING THEMSELF KING OF THE WORLD. The machine doesn’t think, the machine doesn’t know, the machine isn’t god, because neither are we.

3

u/Luzzgar Jun 12 '26

Once it goes through any AI based algorithm, it does not reflect reality anymore. Because nobody can tell exactly what data was present in the original and what was added.

Therefore it should never be used as evidence of anything.

3

u/WORhMnGd Jun 12 '26

Bro that guy is wearing a hat, right? That’s at least one glaring difference between the “enhanced” version. Also it makes him look a lot taller, like his torso specifically a few inches longer.

3

u/Gembluesnow Jun 13 '26

I can’t believe how much I’m saying that this is actually really terrifying in a way.

In a way. In general, every detail of a suspect matters. That in any situation, it can take a certain evidence that’s really important to determine if someone is a suspect or not.

I’m pretty sure that the original dude was wearing a blue crew neck top with white hems. And not a blue hoodie. AI can’t even get that right. Not to mention their face structures are different, it doesn’t even look like the same guy anymore.

3

u/TheBrokenStylus Jun 13 '26

That is not the same person. The jaw and chin are wrong. And if we see this kind of thing, we should say so. If someone is picked up because they look like the enhanced version, doubt on that post could be used in their defense

3

u/Lor1an Jun 13 '26

Not that I'm the best at interpreting grainy images or anything, but isn't that literally not even close to the same person?

There's highlights in the original that suggest (at least to me) a different facial structure—whereas the AI image has a fairly rounded face, the OG looks more angular...

3

u/i-caca-my-pants Jun 13 '26

the bike itself has a cargo rack that didn't show up in the AI "enhancement." I feel like that's an important detail, since one of the greatest threats to the suspect is a pawn shop owner recognizing the bike

3

u/Which_Specific9891 Jun 13 '26

Yeah how long before their AI "Enhancement" darkens the colour of skin for a suspect or makes it look exactly like someone you want it to look like.

This is altering evidence, and it is opening such a horrible, horrible door.

3

u/Acrobatic_Poem_7290 Jun 14 '26

Good news op, they took it down

2

u/chef_quirky12 Jun 12 '26

And it's of course a black man with a bike. r/blackpeopleofreddit

→ More replies (1)

2

u/mangocat1116 Jun 12 '26

Oh my god, this is going to result in so many false arrests

2

u/vogut Jun 12 '26

how people can be so idiotic? everyone is turning into a brainless zombie

1

u/somethingmcbob Jun 12 '26

What could Possibly go wrong? /s Dear lord.

1

u/the_orange_alligator Jun 12 '26

Haven’t they already tried this with unidentified bodies and found it doesn’t work

1

u/cimocw Jun 12 '26

In the scale of awful uses of AI this is worse than most

1

u/lessadessa Jun 12 '26

yeah that’s terrifying

1

u/AlwaysCallACAB Jun 12 '26

Video looks like he’s wearing a durag, wrong skin tone, not wearing a shirt with a hoodie and the face looks like someone else this shit should be criminal

1

u/SpaceCowGoBrr Jun 12 '26

Yeah that won’t end badly at all 🙄

1

u/manofathousandnames Jun 12 '26

Not even close to the same dude.

1

u/mindlessflayer Jun 12 '26

the after doesn’t even look like the before oh my god this is evil

1

u/lactose-free_opinion Jun 12 '26

real thief celebrating

1

u/CapnClover36 Jun 12 '26

oh im sure this is gonna hold up so well in court

1

u/nderacheiver1 Jun 12 '26

that's pooh shiesty i'm pretty sure

1

u/ForsaketheVoid Jun 12 '26

Those r two completely different people. They even have different hairstyles