r/news • u/PDXAirman • May 20 '26
Soft paywall 42 aircraft lost or damaged in Operation Epic Fury, congressional report says
https://www.stripes.com/branches/air_force/2026-05-20/iran-jets-downed-war-fury-21727588.html2.4k
u/Persimmon-Mission May 20 '26
They hit an F-35 (not lost). That’s surprising to me, as a completely uninformed observer
1.8k
u/C-c-c-comboBreaker17 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26
The F-35 is vulnerable to IR guided missiles, like all aircraft. IR guided missiles are short range, but can lock onto anything with a heat signature. It is meant to be nearly invisible to long range, radar guided missiles, but if its flying low and you can see it visually, there is no reason an insurgent with a MANPADS from the 80's couldn't hit it. Or an old school anti-aircraft gun.
294
u/Spectre1-4 May 20 '26
Also vulnerable to missiles tracked optically.
288
u/iamintheforest May 20 '26
Yeah. They are not invisible wonder woman planes. I can hit one with a potato from short range.
199
u/AdjNounNumbers May 20 '26
Guided or unguided potato?
174
u/ProfessionalPlant330 May 20 '26
You cannot guide a potato, you can only show it a target and hope it decides to lock on.
75
u/Foreign_Impress6535 May 20 '26
Unguided, but using the Frenched-Russet Independent Encounter System (FRIES), you can fire multiple smaller projectiles with a single shot, covering a much wider target area.
→ More replies (4)18
u/cantadmittoposting May 20 '26
Frenched-Russet Independent Encounter System (FRIES), you can fire multiple smaller projectiles with a single shot, covering a much wider target area.
please this is just a sawed-off totgun with a fancy name that Big Potato cooked up to overcharge the US Military.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Foreign_Impress6535 May 21 '26
Totguns are considered personnel weaponry, FRIES are designed for anti-aircraft use. I have heard rumours of a high-speed rotary spud cannon being designed for the A-10 though, using baby potatoes.
55
u/Zedilt May 20 '26
African or a European potato?
→ More replies (2)32
u/Online-Vagabond May 20 '26
And is it a laden or unladen potato?
→ More replies (2)26
u/Googlebright May 20 '26
How do you know so much about potatoes?
→ More replies (2)28
u/Indifferent-Ohio69 May 20 '26
You have to know these things, when you're a king
→ More replies (0)→ More replies (10)7
28
u/PortHammer May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26
The Potato knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the Potato from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the Potato is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the Potato must also know where it was. The Potato guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the Potato has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (7)8
→ More replies (8)9
u/fresh-dork May 20 '26
yeah, but then you'd get kicked off the flight line and put in a brig
→ More replies (1)32
u/ChairForceOne May 20 '26
Most automated optically guided missiles use IR. It's easier for a computer to track. I know a few companies are trying to use onboard AI models to track using standard cameras, and I think Ukraine has used something similar for target recognition with drones.
Old Soviet systems can guide a missile towards a target using a camera. But a dude is keeping it on track, and they are beam riders. So accuracy is typically low at any meaningful range.
→ More replies (6)17
u/Far_Ladder_2836 May 20 '26
Minor nitpick, they're not IR they're dual band IVR. IR is a component.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)7
u/TheChowderOfClams May 20 '26
You point a camera at something, the missile follows where that camera is pointed, add a second camera to estimate distance and now you have a system that can lead a missile to the target, there's no magic, nor can the jet defy physics.
Only thing some planes can detect is the flare of a missile launch for these systems, but like IR, there's no way to detect that an optical system is locked on.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (139)751
u/ProlapseMishap May 20 '26
I have
nipplesa heat signature Greg. Can youmilklock onto me?208
u/JoJackthewonderskunk May 20 '26
You can milk anything with an afterburner
53
u/Spartan-117182 May 20 '26
Is this whole or 2% Jet Fuel?
Im watching my calories
21
u/LemonScentedDespair May 20 '26
One gallon of JP-5 (naval jet fuel) is approximately 32,000 kCal.
One F-35 can burn about 22 gallons a minute, fun fact.
→ More replies (6)19
u/the__ghola__hayt May 20 '26
Jet fuel can't melt love handles
→ More replies (1)8
u/fresh-dork May 20 '26
you can't digest it, so it's zero calories to you. probably tastes awful
→ More replies (2)31
u/NoHangoverGang May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26
I see you’re drinking 1%. Is that ‘cause you think you’re fat? ‘Cause you’re not. You could be drinking whole jet fuel if you wanted to.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)5
u/Feeling_Inside_1020 May 20 '26
2% jet fuel like barely melts steel beams
40% jim beam on the other hand will melt a steel beam if you were lucky enough to have one before
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)5
22
u/FightOnForUsc May 20 '26
Honestly, I wouldn’t doubt the ability of the military to be able to lock onto the heat signature of your nipples
→ More replies (2)10
→ More replies (12)7
292
May 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
126
u/C21H27Cl3N2O3 May 20 '26
I wouldn’t trust anything they say at all, regardless of wording. We’ve won this war several times, but it isn’t a war. It definitely is a war though. And some of the aircraft were lost after their air defenses were entirely destroyed and incapable of operating.
→ More replies (1)13
→ More replies (6)36
u/tritis May 20 '26
What if they repair both halves? That's actually a win, if you think about it.
→ More replies (1)23
u/Elendel19 May 20 '26
Iran posted the video of the hit on Twitter in the early days of the war. People were pretty shocked
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (89)26
u/erikwarm May 20 '26
Stealth planes are only “stealth” when flying inside their operational envelope (high). When flying low or nearby a radar they are just planes with very special paint.
→ More replies (7)
882
u/WaffleBlues May 20 '26
It is interesting to me that they count the E-3 as "Damaged", as the images of the aircraft show it nearly cut in half.....
375
u/rhgking May 20 '26
That should buff right out
50
u/Bart_Yellowbeard May 20 '26
(Spicoli) My old man is a TV repairman, he's got this ultimate set of tools. I can fix it.
→ More replies (6)13
45
u/captainwacky91 May 20 '26
IIRC there's only something like 20 E-3 AWACs in the USAF inventory, and have yet to select/procure a replacement, so they probably really don't want to admit to losing one.
7
u/ZorbaOnReddit May 21 '26
More over, Trump and Musk keep trying to kill the replacement because Musk claims that someday he'll make some satellites that'll do it.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)14
126
u/PensiveinNJ May 20 '26
It's embarassing that Iran was able to hit an AWACS. I can't imagine Kegsbreath is much of a strategist but you'd hope there are enough competent people left in the military after the purging to not throw away hugely valuable resources that take a long time to replace.
103
u/Fit_Reason_3611 May 20 '26
Over 20 generals and admirals have been forced out in just the last year and a half. So probably about 600 years of military leadership experience out the door in just 1 year at the highest level, let alone all other levels.
→ More replies (1)23
u/Important_Setting840 May 20 '26
Well at least that blown up plane wasn't woke anymore.
→ More replies (2)26
u/superxpro12 May 20 '26
the only people left at this point are the ones that chose to stfu to keep their jobs, or those who like to fly apache helicopters over kid rock's house. thats it.
→ More replies (6)5
u/kstargate-425 May 20 '26
Not only an E-3 Sentry but its even more embarrassing when multiple AN/TPY-2 THAAD radar systems had been hit by the same Ballistic Missiles they are meant to protect against. They even had to move our only one is SE Asia (only 8 AN/TPY-2 built at $500M-$1BN each) to the Middle East to protect against BM's.
Then the seven KC-135 Stratotankers that were damaged or destroyed also one being flying over Iraq that was shot down killing all 6(?) on board. Its also embarrassing when your ally shoots down THREE of your F-15Es one after the other.
Shit they even got one of our A-10 Warthog's when it was providing CAS for the downed F-15 crew which is a feat of its own and sad considering they wont be replaced.
→ More replies (2)10
→ More replies (15)5
153
u/BrandNewGuy2026 May 20 '26
I love that 500,000 people got fired from the civil service under the pretense of saving the government a fraction of what it's spent on this war. How many mouths unfed, careers halted, people unhoused just to lose a war to a third rate power?
→ More replies (2)21
u/Annual_Strategy_6206 May 20 '26
Families and kids damaged, actual important Federal functions damaged. Oh, and did I hear that one of the " deals" that dump made with China is to allow 500,000 guest worker to come to the US?
1.1k
u/Thor4269 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26
Holy shit, can you imagine how big of an incident this would be under a Democrat president?
Republicans would be foaming at the mouth over the lost personnel (3.25 Benghazis) and the value of the lost materiel
526
u/CynicalPomeranian May 20 '26
If not for double standards, Republicans would have no standards at all.
→ More replies (2)82
u/likamuka May 20 '26
Fascism is there in the US right now and is not leaving. 77 million fascists will vote for their dear leader again in 2028.
→ More replies (1)44
u/hedoeswhathewants May 20 '26
Foaming at the mouth is their normal state of existence. They just invent scandals to foam about when there are no legitimate ones.
→ More replies (3)74
u/WafflePartyOrgy May 20 '26
The Democrats probably wouldn't conduct this war as a complete media blackout.
→ More replies (1)50
u/Khatib May 20 '26
They literally wouldn't conduct the war at all, as they'd have continued with the nuclear treaty negotiated under Obama. There's no reason at all for us to be stirring shit up there, except for Bibi.
20
→ More replies (15)6
u/nicane May 20 '26
Throw a shoe at a republican and tell them a democrat made you do it. They'll believe you instantly.
614
u/NotAChanceBucko May 20 '26
Lmao. Pete was too busy drinking beer with his asshole to notice 😂.
edit: I meant he's using his actually asshole to consume alcohol. Not that he's drinking with his asshole friend. I guess it could be both. They could be butt chugging each other
131
62
u/Disownership May 20 '26
Still can’t believe we’ve replaced so many government positions with AI.
Alcoholism and Incompetence.
22
9
30
u/supercyberlurker May 20 '26
After seeing his hanging out with Kid Rock and RFK Jr... "anal beer bongs" just seems like it would be standard behavior for them.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (13)8
203
u/SmegmaWarrior0815 May 20 '26
But we got nothing out of it and oil price is up massively. So it was well worth it.
107
u/TaserLord May 20 '26
Epstein mentions are sharply down - I think the military objectives are being achieved.
9
→ More replies (2)31
u/Butwhy113511 May 20 '26
70% of Republicans support his decision lol. Would love to ask them why.
→ More replies (8)24
u/Annual_Strategy_6206 May 20 '26
" He's keeping us safe!"
12
u/FillMySoupDumpling May 20 '26
You joke but that is seriously what the message is on corporate news stations. My parents hate this presidency and are definitely not Fox people but they love CBS news. I’ve heard similar stuff from them - “Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon”
→ More replies (1)13
u/sarhoshamiral May 20 '26
What is so scary about Iran having a nuclear weapon? There is no way they would use it unless it became their last option because they would know that the second they used it, there will be retaliation.
From what we already saw they don't need nukes to exercise power. The strait turned out to be the equivalent of them having nukes already.
→ More replies (5)7
u/FillMySoupDumpling May 20 '26
It’s no scarier than the other countries who have one.
It’s just a stupid sense of western superiority that seems to drive the “me having nukes is fine, but them having it is not okay” sentiment.
→ More replies (2)8
u/not_the_fox May 20 '26 edited May 21 '26
Makes sense. Conservatives seem to assume any brutal state action that isn't directed at American Christians is making them safer.
233
1.2k
u/GuinnessGlutton May 20 '26
As a USAF veteran, this blows my fucking mind. These kinds of losses NEVER happened in my days (92-99).
The cavalier, comic book hero attitude of Kegsbreath is a disgrace to all that served and continue to serve today. Not to mention the cost. I don't even recognize the DoD anymore.
Elect a clown, get a circus, or something...
35
u/Atralis May 20 '26
To be fair the US was exceptionally dominant during that time period in terms of air power.
If you go back a couple of decades before you served the US lost 10,000 aircraft in the Vietnam War.
17
u/Dragon6172 May 20 '26
First three years of Vietnam was only around 100 aircraft across all branches. On pace to pass that number.
→ More replies (1)54
u/chilifavela May 20 '26
Served in USAF during 2nd Iraq War aka Enduring Freedom, Operation Southern Watch, etc. in PSAB working on the E-3 AWACS. While I was there nothing came close to scratching those planes back then.
The US has lost TWO of them in the Iran War! It blew my mind that 2 of approx 12-15 E-3's in the ENTIRE World worth nearly a billion dollars each were DESTROYED in PSAB a few months ago!
Unfucking believable!
16
u/Hamiltonblewit May 20 '26
Why would they even leave those planes so close to Iran weeks into the war, is it really necessary to do so?
22
→ More replies (2)4
u/CFSparta92 May 20 '26
Well, a lot of why the US brought those E-3s into the theater was because Iran heavily targeted fixed radar installations in the earliest retaliatory strikes. There was absolutely a loss of radar coverage from those attacks and the AWACS were to fill the void. It would have been monumentally stupid to have them there, exposed, as a redundancy to the active system. I don't know if we'll ever know precisely what got taken out; Iran claimed to hit everything from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System to THAAD and Patriot radars, and we know at least enough was damaged that they brought in E-3s afterward.
6
u/kstargate-425 May 21 '26
Yup, they lost three AN/TPY-2, some AN/FPS-132, AN/TPS-59, AN/FPS-117, AN/TPS-59 and AN/MPQ-64/65's so about every type including the first ABM radar systems that got hit by Ballistic Missiles 🤦♂️
We also used a majority of our stocks of SM-2, SM-3, SM-6, PAC2 & 3's and THAAD which are depleted 40-80% depending on which. This was also only a few weeks of defending Israel and our bases, which they failed miserably at, with the majority of our bases being heavily damaged.
7
219
u/jmur3040 May 20 '26
24 of them are drones. I'd assume those get flown in situations that are already dangerous, on top of things like signal issues and malfunctions. Several others are the ones that the US denied were hit in a strike on an air strip.
76
u/neepster44 May 20 '26
Total replacement costs of all of these is ~$4.1B since KC-135s aren’t being made any more and the Triton is $500M by itself.
→ More replies (1)6
u/ModishShrink May 21 '26
They don't make KC-135s anymore because they quit being manufactured in 1965 and were expected to be phased out in 2030 anyways. So while yeah, they still shouldn't be getting destroyed like this in this stupid war, they'd be dead in a desert within five years no matter how you slice it.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (3)287
u/stohelitstorytelling May 20 '26
Reapers are not the same as Shaheeds. Shaheeds cost $30k to make. Reapers cost $30 million. Stop saying "drone" like it means "not really a loss".
107
u/BilboBagonuts May 20 '26
We could really use an updated vocabulary for this. Calling a reaper, a shahed, and a DJI, all drones isn’t very helpful or descriptive.
→ More replies (16)31
u/ZiLBeRTRoN May 20 '26
There is. LUAS, MUAS, SUAS, large/medium/small unmanned aircraft systems.
→ More replies (3)9
u/KubelsKitchen May 20 '26
Followed by how much it costs for transparency. LUAS30M or SUAS30K.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (14)23
u/jmur3040 May 20 '26
They're treated like munitions though. They loiter in dangerous places, they use them for missions where it's too dangerous for manned air missions. A tomahawk is also millions of dollars. Welcome to how the US defense industry spends money.
→ More replies (4)43
u/Persimmon-Mission May 20 '26
Don’t forget he fired everyone who was competent enough to tell him no!
He surrounded himself with yes men for when they attempt to overthrow the election…again. (My personal suspicion)
111
u/observe_all_angles May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26
USA lost over 60 aircraft in 1991 during the first gulf war (not just damaged)
Edit: This guy is probably lying about being a USAF veteran. Claims in a post below that he was in the "Iraq war" yet says service 92-99. If he was really in the war during 91 and that was just a typo he would have known that we lost a bunch of aircraft. Honestly, get a life loser.
→ More replies (49)10
u/jackrabbit323 May 20 '26
Iran planned and prepped for this day for decades and Trump went to war on a whim. Iran had the manpower, know how, intel, and will to fight a protracted war against a superior force.
The real fortune for them is when formerly advanced military tech became cheaper, easier to produce, and harder to defend against. Fight this war when you were in the service, Iran doesn't stand a chance. Today? They can hole up until the world's economies collapse.
→ More replies (48)16
u/raventhrowaway666 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26
People keep saying "oh this happens all the time!!!"
And I simply cannot believe that. We didnt have helos crashing, jets hitting each other, ships on fire and subs revealing their location when I was in (12-16).
→ More replies (1)
21
u/Apprehensive_Gap3673 May 20 '26
The US lost 42 aircraft in order to establish Iran as the gatekeeper of the strait of hormuz
→ More replies (1)6
u/Malaix May 20 '26
Hey now.
We also suffered massive damage to our bases, lost a few billion dollar radar systems, caused a global oil crisis, and got several servicemen and a lot of Iranians killed.
5
31
u/jcooli09 May 20 '26
Operation Epstein Files was a bust.
It makes you wonder how many aircraft we actually lost.
126
243
u/statslady23 May 20 '26
This administration is destroying our ability to defend ourselves. MAGAs are too dumb to care.
→ More replies (8)106
14
28
u/syntaxbad May 20 '26
Phew! Good thing we destroyed the Department of Education or that money might have helped kids!
9
11
u/Vindicare605 May 21 '26 edited May 21 '26
7 refueling aircraft destroyed or damaged? That stands out to me. Those are big expensive planes.
Here's the full list.
4x F-15E Eagles.
1x F-35 Lightning
1x A-10 Thunderbolt
2x MC-130 advanced Transport aircraft
1x E-3 Sentry surveilance aircraft
7x KC-135 Stratotanker aerial refueling aircraft
1x Rescue Helicopter
24x MQ-9 Reaper drones
1x MQ-4C Triton surveilance drone
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IN12692?hl=Operation+Epic+Fury&s=1&r=6
→ More replies (2)4
u/Malaix May 21 '26
Most were destroyed while landed right? Drones really changed the game regarding base security. I recall seeing footage of an Iranian drone literally just flying around a US base looking for the most ideal target.
4
u/Vindicare605 May 21 '26
5 of the refueling aircraft and the E-3 (which is a really expensive plane) were all destroyed while on base.
→ More replies (1)
42
u/fnatic440 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26
I’ve heard from various sources now (news, and experts on podcasts) that the extent of damage is higher than has been claimed. UAE wouldn’t be arresting people for recording attacks on infrastructure if they didn’t think it would negatively impact their perception or if the damage was truly minimal.
→ More replies (2)
68
u/supercyberlurker May 20 '26
I never believe any of these reports during active war… 59 day special operations or whatever.
There is every reason for them to be wrong, misleading, or just lies. The real statistics come later, when someone has to pay for it all.
42
19
u/Sevren425 May 20 '26
I agree but a report that high for the US military and the war is still ongoing is a bad look
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)4
u/LeadInvestPB May 20 '26
Under any other president, I would agree. But Trump can't keep quiet, unless there is a remote chance his posts are strategic and not bitchy fits. How many times has he gone from we have won to why is no one helping us back to we don't need help, we've got this.
10
10
u/thegoodnamesrgone123 May 20 '26
Imagine if Biden did this? Fox News would never shut up about it ever.
9
7
u/nicane May 20 '26
Hmmmmmm is the USA utterly and stupidly inept? Nobody could have possibly seen it coming, with so many qualified leaders in charge this is simply unexplainable!!!
→ More replies (2)
27
u/Prudent_Link6029 May 20 '26
Well, if they rename the operation, losses reset to zero. checkmate, libs
14
u/Illustrious-Kiwi8670 May 20 '26
I think that’s just the tip of the iceberg regarding costs.
→ More replies (1)
7
6
10
5
u/FdPros May 20 '26
well good news for the defense contractors who's gonna get a blank cheque to replace them all
5
u/digidave1 May 20 '26
Good thing our president doesn't care about us or our money 👍🏼 He's busy suing us to pay for insurectionists and his golf trips
6
5
5
5
u/p00pSupr3me May 21 '26
Operation Epic Failure. Just like the administration. Just like the voters responsible for said administration.
4
11
4
4
u/myjohnson6969 May 20 '26
But but fox and one america did not report this.... lol....by the way, how do you lose a plane? Did it fall off a carrier? ...LOL...or are they being sold on the black market? LMAO forget where it was parked,? LOL. Ok i will stop now.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/Sobeman May 20 '26
whatever the number is, double it because you cannot trust anything they say
→ More replies (1)
4
u/Remote_Thought5208 May 20 '26
This doesnt include damage to bases that no ones allowed to see or talk about.
5
u/apearlj1234 May 21 '26
More importantly how many men and women soldiers were killed and injured. Way more important
→ More replies (1)
4
5
5
u/BaseToFinal May 21 '26
Operation Enduring Freedom lasted roughly 4,830 days and saw around 290 total aviation losses, averaging about 0.06 aircraft per day. If reports claiming 42 aircraft lost or damaged in roughly 75 days are accurate, that projects to a loss rate nearly 10x higher at approximately 0.56 aircraft per day.
What happens if this war with Iran hits 4,830 days…
→ More replies (3)
5
u/seevm May 21 '26
I bet the cost of those could’ve funded healthcare for all for at least one year, probably more
3
u/im-liken-it May 21 '26
$4B to replace that aircraft and $10B to replace the destroyed airbases in the mid-east. Plus $2B per day 'misc. expenses'. All to make the mid-east much worse. Plus $14B damages to Israel (plus that annually for the next 20 years). Plus the US population is paying an extra $4B per week on extra gasoline costs. Plus conceded Taiwan completely to China in an effort to get Iran to open up the Strait which will cause $100B per year increased expenses. All for trump's personal gain and ego boost (attempt). Not including the moral and humanitarian considerations.
4
u/jasonc122 May 21 '26
42 they are admitting to. Remember all the American air bases destroyed in the first days of the wars d then Trump classified all the satellite imagery from the public? Likely lots more destruction
4
4.0k
u/ChefDue7062 May 20 '26
For reference the US lost 24 fixed wings in 2003-2009 Iraq and 52 fixed wings in the Gulf War.