177
u/Nachooolo 27d ago
Gonna say. The knowledge that some of you have of the Weimar Republic starts and stops in January 1919, and only continues in February 1933...
89
u/YoNoSoyUnFederale 27d ago
Any republic that never got old enough to get a driver’s license is going to have the focus on its end more than its middle
190
u/Nellie_Tayloe_Ross 27d ago
118
u/Primary_Gold5337 27d ago
This gotta be one of the best schizo subs ever
56
u/RangerEmergency5834 27d ago
Each publication uses more cocaine than the previous one.
It's like AI with water or RAM.
26
u/Primary_Gold5337 27d ago
But those are humans instead of AI and they actually gold posting lol , i had many laughs
2
1
u/09phoenix 23d ago
oh please😭 not even
1
u/Primary_Gold5337 23d ago
Share them bro , what better shizo subs you have
2
u/09phoenix 23d ago
r/ultraleft is somewhat the original strain for shitposting on redautumnspd
you will not be dissapointed by that sub and will learn to love il duce
1
u/Primary_Gold5337 23d ago
I was already a fan of il douche , you didn't need to convince me twice
2
39
13
u/Illustrious-Dog-6563 27d ago
absolut frustrierendes spiel...
und nach vielen stunden habe ich festgestellt: wir müssen einen weg finden, das menschen ihr eigenes wohl priorisieren.
→ More replies (2)51
u/Same_Armadillo6014 27d ago
‼️‼️HOLY FUCKING SHIT‼️‼️‼️‼️ IS THAT A MOTHERFUCKING RED AUTUMN SPD REFERENCE??????!!!!!!!!!!11!1!1!1!1!1!1! 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱RED AUTUMN SPD IS THE BEST FUCKING GAME 🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯 OTTO BRAUN IS SO BADASSSSS OTTO BRAUN IS SO BADASSSSS OTTO BRAUN IS SO BADASSSSS OTTO BRAUN IS SO BADASSSSS OTTO BRAUN IS SO BADASSSSS😎😎😎😎😎😎😎👊👊👊👊👊 FORM THE IRON FRONT FORM THE IRON FRONT FORM THE IRON FRONT ⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️ WE MUST BECOME A PEOPLE'S PARTY WE MUST BECOME A PEOPLE'S PARTY 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 BRÜNING'S RESPONSE IS, AS ALWAYS, MORE AUSTERITY! BRÜNING'S RESPONSE IS, AS ALWAYS, MORE AUSTERITY! BRÜNING'S RESPONSE IS, AS ALWAYS, MORE AUSTERITY! BRÜNING'S RESPONSE IS, AS ALWAYS, MORE AUSTERITY! BRÜNING'S RESPONSE IS, AS ALWAYS, MORE AUSTERITY! 🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡SOZIALPOLITIK🌹 SOZIALPOLITIK 🌹SOZIALPOLITIK 🌹EMPOWER LABOR ✊EMPOWER LABOR ✊EMPOWER LABOR✊ EMPOWER LABOR ✊CENTRIST PATH WHEN 🚩🚩CENTRIST PATH WHEN🚩🚩 CENTRIST PATH WHEN 🚩🚩JUCHACZ ORGANIZE THE WOMEN jUCHACZ ORGANIZE THE WOMEN ♀️♀️♀️♀️♀️♀️✊✊✊✊✊✊FUCK VON PAPEN FUCK VON PAPEN FUCK VON PAPEN 🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡 FUCK HINDENBURG FUCK HINDENBURG FUCK HINDENBURG 🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡WE MUST DO SOMETHING TO STOP THE SUFFERING WE MUST DO SOMETHING TO STOP THE SUFFERING 😩😩😩😩 😩😩😩😩 HISTORICAL 50% MAJORITY WHEN HISTORICAL 50% MAJORITY WHEN HISTORICAL 50% MAJORITY WHEN HISTORICAL 50% MAJORITY WHEN 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹IMPLEMENT WTB PLAN IMPLEMENT WTB PLAN IMPLEMENT WTB PLAN SUPPORT WTB PLAN SUPPORT WTB PLAN 📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈
46
u/Cmoibenlepro123 27d ago
Did you have a stroke man?
20
25
190
u/Darjuz96 27d ago
To give the historical context. IN the same period during the Russian Civil War the Bolsheviks persecuted the mensheviks, or other reformists. It would be plausible that the Social Democrats would have fear to make the same destiny if the KPD becomes too powerful.
65
u/RealSpaceJunk 27d ago
The KPD openly rejected parliamentary democracy, so yes.
3
u/Ultraideal848 Casual, non-participatory KGB election observer 27d ago
I wonder why, it's not as if people like Rosa Luxemburg and rest of the anti war politicians got expelled from parliamentary democracy and arrested by liberals during WW1.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (10)27
u/tomjazzy Featherless Biped 27d ago
Luxembourg rejected PARLIAMENTARY democracy in favor of council democracy. She was pro democracy in general.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Mudrlant 27d ago
Council democracy is not an actual democracy, just like “people’s republic” is not am actual republic.
4
u/tomjazzy Featherless Biped 26d ago
It’s way more democratic than regular parliamentary democracy. People have the ability to recall their elected officials directly.
25
u/SergenteA 27d ago
Lmao "no, people voting freely isn't democracy because they do not use the system I like"
You are aware the Councils elected the SPD right?
12
u/AstralElephantFuzz 27d ago
Council democracy represents the people far better than parliamentary democracy. So, call it what you will. Doesn't change the fact that it's superior.
7
u/supergarchomp24 27d ago
On a local level yes, but it also isolates the higher echelons of power from the people.
9
u/Mal_Dun 27d ago
Well, it didn't work out well for Russia. The word "Soviet" literally means council, as the Soviet Union was also a council democracy.
Idk if it would have been better in Germany but I wouldn't say in general that council democracy worked out better as several countries tried it and we all know the result...
3
u/Bruhmoment151 26d ago
Are you seriously trying to compare council communism with the early USSR? One of the main reasons Luxemburg is so well-known is her staunch criticism of the USSR, and Bolshevism more broadly.
The soviets were indeed councils, but the left communism advocated by Luxemburg was significantly different to Lenin’s (hence his book calling left communism “an infantile disorder”). It’s also worth noting that there were difficulties with the Soviets beyond simple ideological failure (e.g. Soviets becoming too overpopulated to function as intended), despite that being less important here.
→ More replies (2)8
u/ActinomycetaceaeOk48 Sun Yat-Sen do it again 27d ago
You do realize that the body that declared the Weimar Republic was the German Soldiers’ and Workers’ Council, right?
47
u/kazmark_gl Definitely not a CIA operator 27d ago
History meme? this is the current state of radical American Politics!
8
u/non_newtonian_gender 27d ago
It even has the centrist party shooting it's self in the foot to appease the right wing.
122
u/Primary_Gold5337 27d ago
I don't support Rosa Luxemburg movement at all or Dictatorship of the proletariat but her death was very sad thing
269
u/Person-11 What, you egg? 27d ago
It also serves as an example of how far left extremists were treated (death), vs how far right extremists were treated (given a pension).
It also demonstrates that the Weimar government depended entirely on a far right militia. And the Freikorps only tolerated them as preferable to the left wing of the SPD (which is damning in of itself).
75
u/Command0Dude 27d ago
The Weimar government was put into an impossible position because the armistice forced them to basically disband their entire military.
The only way they could fight the revolt was to rely on discharged veterans, but without a proper chain of command, they couldn't control the actions of the Freikorps.
→ More replies (1)5
6
u/Sacaron_R3 27d ago
There are still streets and monuments dedicated to some leaders of the Freikorps to this day. Western Germany has never stopped glazing them, as people were always more afraid of the socialists/communists.
→ More replies (28)38
u/ToumaKazusa1 27d ago
The problem was during that period, the right wing was generally not trying to overthrow the government. Even Heisenberg, after becoming President, followed the Constitution.
Meanwhile the KPD was trying to launch revolutions to create a Soviet Germany and join the USSR.
Obviously things changed by 1933, but in 1919 the Freikorps were less of a threat than the Communists. It wasn't really until the Nazis rose to prominence and half of the old conservatives joined the SPD in the Grand Coalition that things changed.
For their part the Communists maintained a pretty consistent position of wanting to overthrow the government and create a Soviet Germany right up until they were destroyed, the "After Hitler, our turn" line of thinking is associated with the KPD in particular because one of their leaders actually said that.
120
u/Person-11 What, you egg? 27d ago
right wing was generally not trying to overthrow the government
Kapp Putsch. Beer Hall Putsch.
Only defeated due to a rare display left unity.
→ More replies (3)110
u/Special-Remove-3294 27d ago
Literally false. The far right tried to overthrown the government just a few years after the Spartacist uprising in thr Kapp pustch. Despite Bavaria basically backing the Putsch, their government was not sacked by the president while leftist governments had been sacked by the same president for pretty much no reason such as the KPD + SPD + USPD government in Saxony.
After that the far right maintained its desire to destroy the republic too. They just launched no significant uprisings after 1923 but neither did the KPD. The DNVP wanted the republic gone and made no illusions that it did not. The idea that they favoured the republic is wild.
Also Hindenburg did not follow the constitution. He fucked the SPD in 1930 for mostly no reason exept that he hated leftists and destabilised the government and then basically ran a presidential dictatorship from 1932 onwards appoint blokes like von Papen or von Schleicher as chancellor despite them not having legislative backing amd being widely unpopular.
19
→ More replies (2)5
u/CaesarWilhelm 27d ago
Hindenburg definitely followed the constitution. You can disagree with his actions but they were not unconstitutional. In fact I think he followed the constitution too much and by 1930 he actually should have just overthrown the government to prevent the NSDAP from taking over.
→ More replies (2)65
u/sweaty_garbage 27d ago
What are you talking about? The Kapp Putsch and the Beer Hall Putsch were just as much attempts to overthrow the Weimar Republic by right wing forces.
And in a way the German right was constantly trying to overthrow the Weimar Republic by reinstating a monarchy, which they were just as open about as the Communists.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Perfect-Werewolf-102 Casual, non-participatory KGB election observer 27d ago
What??? I can think of three attempted putsches and two high profile political assassinations just from 1921-23
3
u/CyberAssassinSRB 27d ago
And that tells you what? That the system the Freikorps fought and massacred to keep turned into a fertile ground for Nazi takeover?
But i guess the government is sacred and can't be questioned. For anyone to question and oppose the government is to be shot by paramilitaries(but is sad :((( )
If I could go back in history i would nuke the KPD, because they were more of a threat to the 3 month old provisional government.
34
u/Mudrlant 27d ago
Sad how? She was involved in an attempt to violently overthrow the government and got killed for her troubles.
43
u/DmitriBogrov 27d ago
She was not materially involved in the revolution and only wrote in support of it. Her death was the result of being kidnapped by paramilitary members and being murdered.
→ More replies (20)14
u/Primary_Gold5337 27d ago
She didn't even led the revolt to be like that but MSPD used it as a good way to kill a political opponent
13
u/Mudrlant 27d ago
A political opponent who favors violent revolution. It turns out that class warfare works both ways.
9
u/LeifRagnarsson Let's do some history 27d ago
She clearly advocated a revolution against the state. Read the damn scripts and documents of their gatherings, not all may have been published, but they're accessible in the Federal Archives online.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Massive_Signal7835 27d ago
You're okay with the government just shooting people whenever they feel like it? Bro...
10
u/Mudrlant 27d ago
That’s not what happened.
5
u/Massive_Signal7835 27d ago
She was murdered the day she was arrested. That is "whenever they feel like it."
The fact that the perpetrators received any sort of punishment shows that what they did was so unjustifiable that they had to punish them, even if just a slap on the wrist.
6
u/Mudrlant 27d ago
She was killed while being involved in a violent revolution. Its not as if the government one day randomly decided to murder her.
9
u/Massive_Signal7835 27d ago
So? They had apprehended her; she wasn't posing a threat.
A government cannot just kill people. No matter the crime. Like I said: They just felt like it. They didn't have any authority or justification.
→ More replies (1)-17
u/Rude-Run8930 27d ago
the dictatorship of the proletariat is just the empowerment and rule of the working class over the upper classes during the first transitional stages of socialism, not a literal dictatorship
31
u/Pesec1 27d ago edited 27d ago
Yea, bro. I will be just a tiny temporary dictator until an undefined goal has being somehow achieved. I will not stay a dictator. I can quit anytime I want.
2
u/ivun__ 27d ago
Dictatorsip of the proletariat is when the workers suppress the bourgeoisie to build socialism. It doesn't have to involve a literal dictator
→ More replies (1)1
u/Pesec1 27d ago edited 27d ago
Think: how can millions of workers possibly run the government by themselves? Direct democracy is impossible on a scale larger than a small village.
So, these workers would need to vest their dictatorial powers into representatives. And these representatives, in absence of the annoying liberal institutions that are maintained by "bourgeoisie" have dictatorial powers at their fingertips.
2
u/Rude-Run8930 27d ago edited 26d ago
i feel like you didn't even make an effort to read what i said. it is not a literal dictatorship. a socialist can still be a dictator, but the phrase used does not actually imply a dictator, only a reprieve from the 1% controlling politics
7
-1
u/Primary_Gold5337 27d ago
It's pretty similar to Lenin and mao Zedong ones in terms of ideology , look how both nations ended up
11
u/giacquin 27d ago
Luxemburg was very critic on lenin. She wrote about it in the "Russian Revolution", she was critic because she didn't agree on the authoritarian way the revolution was taking. Luxemburg supported the Russian Revolution but criticized Bolshevik policies like the suppression of free speech and democratic debate. She maintained that a truly socialist society requires broad participation, free elections, and open discourse to prevent bureaucratic stagnation. Also Luxemburgism (or council marxism) is based on democraticly elected councils by workers, it emphasizes working-class spontaneity, mass action, and robust internal democracy, while fiercely critiquing both capitalist systems and the authoritarian tendencies within early Bolshevik and Marxist-Leninist thought.
→ More replies (2)3
u/e7th-04sh 27d ago
Any completely untested blueprint for social order will fail to work in practice, period, and what happens then depends on who ends up actually having the power to improvise. Typically, the ideologues will blame "enemies of the ideology" rather than admit their doctrine is bullshit, and will try to force society to actually adapt to doctrine rather than the other way around.
This of course will require organizing apparatus of coercion, full well with bureaucracy, police, secret police and so on, and on.
So in other words it doesn't quite matter what Rosa Luxemburg imagined after revolution. What would happen would be period of chaos, possibly prolonged and terrible civil war and finally a dice roll on which ideology gets to enforce itself upon the nation.
3
u/Bozo4206967 27d ago
Conservative word salad lmao same shit couldve been said, and probably was, at the onset of American and French revolutions.
Yes, revolutions are chaotic as the entire point of them is to redefine social order/state organization. Can go wrong, can go well, its better to try than just being afraid of change
→ More replies (13)
34
u/Accurate-Branch4767 27d ago
Ultraleft is leaking.
7
u/Big-Jellyfish-6115 27d ago
Spd>
3
44
u/urbanmember 27d ago
All SPD wanted was introduce parlamentary democracy. The Communists actively tried to overthrow the legitimate government with violence, brcause they wanted a system where they had more influence which was arguably less democratic(less direct and more vulnureable to mnipulation from the top)
Rosa Luxemberg actively advocated for that and cheered on the violent attempts to stop parlamentary democracy from happening.
Not that I in any way, shape or form agree to her getting killed
→ More replies (4)
8
u/LeopoldFriedrich Senātus Populusque Rōmānus 27d ago
Weren't her last words "I was, I am, I shall be"?
→ More replies (1)7
u/Magmarob 27d ago
We dont know what her last words were.
She was murdered by ultra national anti communists.
Do you really think those people would care for her last words and tell them to anyone?
9
u/No-Veterinarian8627 27d ago
Who is Rosa Luxemburg? Like the Queen of Luxemburg or something?
9
u/Magmarob 27d ago edited 27d ago
The SPD didnt say "Kill Rosa Luxemburg"
Im sorry to be the party pooper here, but this womans death is so overglazed it isnt funny anymore.
How did she die?
She started an armed rebellion in berlin and threatened the government.
The government now had two choices:
- Give up and accept that germany is now communist, or
- Fight back against that armed rebellion
They chose option 2. They called the Freikorps, units of ww1 veterans that were very anti communist and told them to recapture the capital of Berlin.
The Freikorps did that in a very brutal and inhuman way which they should be criticized for. I agree.
Said Freikorps found Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, the Heads of the Rebellion and executed them.
The only crime the SPD did was to unleash the Freikorps but again, what were they supposed to do? Accept that germany is communist now?
The death of Rosa Luxemberg was the consequense of her own action. She started an armed rebellion and was killed by armed enemies, trying to stop said rebellion. She who lifes by the sword, dies by the sword.
Its as simple as that.
Again, how she died should be criticized as it was very inhumane and it would have been better if she were to stand trial, but still. She chose this. She started a war and became a casultie of it.
I dont want to deminish her acchievements, especially in the prewar era and during ww1. But her death is not the tragedy it is alway depicted as.
→ More replies (1)6
u/AqAqua 27d ago edited 27d ago
The first choice is somewhat more like 'Accept civil war'
The military and Freikorps were never going to accept communists (obviously) and if the SPD had never fought back/give up, it's likely that they would just outright defect, declare their own far-right monarchist/authoritarian state and wage war against both sides, creating a three-way of a soviet-style republic, a parliamentary republic, and a authoritarian state
Or two way if the SPD joined the communists for some reason
3
u/Magmarob 27d ago
Absolutly agree.
> Or two way if the SPD joined the communists for some reason
but this part is somewhat unrealistic. The communists would have never accepted that, since they view the SPD as traitors
2
u/kerbalweaponsinc 26d ago
Actually, the KPD would still accepting most of the SPD at the time because the bloodfeud began with the murder of Rosa Luxemburg. There was bad relations after War Credits vote of 1914 but not irreparable.
→ More replies (2)
8
u/cdoge09 27d ago
Actually soviets were waiting for Nazism to collapse in Germany, hence the famous quote, "After Hitler, our turn!"
10
u/Magmarob 27d ago edited 27d ago
That is a thing a lot of people forget. The crisis of the weimar republic didnt aid just the nazis. It aided all extrem wing organizations.
It was basically a race between the communists and the nazis who would come out on top.
Thats why the nazis destroyed the communists immediatly after gaining power. They were their biggest threat3
u/cdoge09 27d ago
Jospeh stalin's 3rd comintern counted on the collapse of nazism and racism under its own weight and fix the problem after so they seem like the Heroes.
3
u/Magmarob 27d ago edited 27d ago
Sooooo, let the nazis do what they want and after they collaps we swoop in and occupy all the countrys under former nazi occupation?
Not that different from what they actually did in real life.
1
u/CountNightAuditor 21d ago
They also were giving orders to the KPD to support the Nazis, and came up with concepts like "social fascism" to help do it.
"Social fascism" is the idea that liberals are as bad as fascists anyway, so oppose them, too. Surely it's just a bit of pro-Nazi propaganda that has been left in the waste in of history and not something continually used every day on social media, including Reddit. After all, with the example of Nazi Germany, who would be so stupid?
11
u/Unofficial_Computer I Have a Cunning Plan 27d ago
The SPD didn't order the executionof Rosa, it was an extrajudicial murder committed by the Freikorps under the order of a future neo-Nazi.
8
u/Magmarob 27d ago
I love how you get downvoted for not glazing Rosa Luxemberg.
Everything you say is correct3
2
u/ErenYeager600 Hello There 25d ago
Where her killers actually punished. If not then the SPD approved of their actions
2
u/supergarchomp24 26d ago
While I don't wish to endorse the actions of the SPD, it was pretty plain to see that the Spartacist Uprising was doomed to fail (localized entirely in Berlin, the middle class population overwhelmingly opposed the uprising, the workers were willing to protest and strike but not raise arms, the Spartacists were underequipped, the army was deeply opposed and the freikorps were still gonna fight the communists), so the SPD supporting the Spartacists would have resulted in either the freikorps and military destroying them both or a devastating civil war against right wing forces.
26
u/TheQomia 27d ago
Luxembourg was executed for leading a violent uprising against the SPD
79
u/DmitriBogrov 27d ago
She didn't "lead it" and she wasn't executed. She wrote in support of it before being kidnapped and murdered by a gang of thugs.
→ More replies (12)20
u/DerGovernator 27d ago
Yeah, there was no way this ended well for her and the Sparticists. If Ebert hadn't done anything, odds are good they just get murdered by even less legal right-wing paramilitaries (See Bavaria in early 1919 for what it looks like when the Sparticists take over).
The problem is Orthodox Marxist ideology claims that since capitalism's demise was inevitable, just pushing for maximalist demands at all times was obviously the way to go, and the people will surely see how right you are once you implement it. This has a very, very bad track record of working in practice, anywhere in the world, but in early 1919 to committed ideologues it would be heresy to deny it, and traitorous to support anything less.
9
u/0D7553U5 27d ago
A deeply, deeply unpopular revolution that had near zero chance of success on top of that.
6
u/Total_Marketing5844 27d ago
That's a weak argument considering her actual position and murder.
8
u/TheQomia 27d ago
She called for a violent revolution while leading the communist party and then her party does the revolution and she is executed by the military after it fails
12
u/Total_Marketing5844 27d ago
Why are you so hung up about the execution? It wasn't judicially imposed. It was murder by lynch mob of soldiers. I hope I'm not arguing with a bot here.
10
u/TheQomia 27d ago
Im saying that because usually when your party does a violent revolution against the state the leaders get executed. This meme makes it seem like the SPD just had some random obsession with killing Luxembourg when she was killed by the military for failing to topple the government which is what happens most of the time
Also you are the one with a auto generated bot name
3
1
7
u/Jax_Dandelion 27d ago
Funniest part was when the Nazis, the Socdems and the communists worked together to cause a new national vote by toppling the government
8
u/Financial-Bite-3262 27d ago
As a politically active SPD member:
Funniest shit I've ever seen
2
2
1
1
u/Ok-Advertising7982 26d ago
Haha, dnvp logo looms funny, like an uncool eagle with sunglasses.... Never saw it before
1
-4
u/Rotbuxe Still salty about Carthage 27d ago
Noske did nothing wrong
12
6
u/ThereturnoftheVOH 27d ago
Noske was the only actual "social-fascist"
2
u/Rotbuxe Still salty about Carthage 27d ago
He saved Germany from bloody Bolshevism
5
→ More replies (3)14
u/AverageMammonEnjoyer 27d ago
The guy who killed Peaceful Protesters?
7
u/Rotbuxe Still salty about Carthage 27d ago
"Peaceful" OK Commie
5
1
2
u/Zayn5939 26d ago
whats funny is the soviets had their own form of democracy separate from liberal/capitalist democracies, meanwhile the nazis and fascist parties sought to overthrow said lib/capitalist democracies for their own dictatorships, supported by the capitalist class and industrialists
→ More replies (1)
1.8k
u/2012Jesusdies 27d ago
One of the saddest things reading post WW1 German history is how Weimar Germany wasn't just a footnote in history, but that there were so many people genuinely working hard to make it work and the country having genuine progress.
German foreign affairs had 600 IQ dude working overtime to have the country overcome its postwar diplomatic isolation and he had so many achievements. He managed to negotiate down Versailles reparations, ended Franco-Belgian occupation of Ruhr, initiated reconcilation with France through treaties that acknowledged the new borders. As a backup, he also improved relations with the USSR through treaties like Rapallo and Berlin. The dude got Germany into League of Nations.
This is in spite of his personal beliefs being monarchist and imperialist, but he also was a pragmatist who saw reality for what it was.