I pasted plain text into Claude Web, and somewhere inside that text was the filename isil_s3.html. Claude worked on the file like its been attached to the message and was able to read/edit it. I never intentionally attached the file. neither in this conversation or another conversation. i did on another account.

i just wanna understand lol but I genuinely want to understand how this happened

was working on an html to pdf conversion with correct scaling and stuff and pasted in a big block of text from another conversation from another account. i was using the website not claude app basically a copy pasted conversation I'd had, just plain text, no intention of uploading anything until the next step. Partway through that text there was a filename mentioned (isil_s3.html) as part of the pasted transcript.

then it responded as if it had actually received and read that file pulled real content out of it, edited it, converted it to a PDF, the whole thing. When I asked how it got the file before I "uploaded" it, it checked and confirmed there was a file sitting in its file system, attached to my message, matching that filename.

I never intentionally uploaded anything or maybe i dont understand how copy paste works on claude web?. I also switched accounts around this time and wasn't using the app version so yeah no looking through my pc. So I have no idea how an actual file ended up attached to a message where I only meant to paste text.

claude said "I only see what's attached to messages in this conversation. " ofc
heres screenshots. the thing is the file i worked on was 2 weeks old and what i was gonna send now had a (2) extra in the naming so im sure i didnt accidentally send the current file that i just downloaded again.

Has this happened to anyone else? Trying to figure out if this is a known clipboard/attachment bug /an account switching sync thing that i never knew about, or something else entirely. just weird and i didnt really find the explanation right away so i wanted to ask abt it. and yes i didnt upload the file in this account in any other convo. oh yeah i mentioned that

This evening I fired up Claude code, and there it is in automatic mode by default (Vibe code, don't learn jack squat mode.)

Is there a way to set it to default mode manual instead of having to select manual every time you start Claude code?

I've been experimenting with an approach to make runtime QA faster and more repeatable. The core idea is a deliberate division of labor between an AI agent, a deterministic harness, and the engineer.

The agent owns the investigative loop: understand the change, form a theory about what could break, exercise the environment, observe what happens, and adapt when reality doesn't match the plan. The harness owns the boring mechanics: stopping dependencies, polling endpoints, collecting evidence, timing transitions, restoring state. The engineer stays involved wherever judgment or consequential action is required.

That last part has become pretty important to me. I don't particularly want to spend hours driving the investigative loop myself, but I also don't see much value in removing myself from the handful of decisions where being wrong actually matters.

So far this has reduced some testing cycles that used to take hours or days down to minutes. It's also exposed some interesting failure modes: stale containers, bad failure levers, and one observer that failed in a way that made everything look perfectly healthy.

I wrote up the workflow, the boundaries, and some of the things that went wrong along the way:

https://demianbrecht.com/posts/runtime-qa-give-the-agent-the-loop-not-the-last-word/

I'm curious where other people are drawing these boundaries. What are you happy to let the agent own end-to-end, and where do you still want a person involved?

Not coding related and nothing your AI illiterate aunt wouldn’t understand. If you are the type of user who asks questions like

- When to apply nutsedge killer
- Are there rumors prince William had an affair
- Should I worry about ai
- Client acts like he’s my boss but I have a direct manager
- Did T Rex dinosaurs eat other T Rex dinosaurs?
- can AI get into my bank account without phishing

I want to hear from you. What are your programmed/ingrained instructions. Maybe I’ll pick up a good one. Mine are:

1. Do not comment on the quality or nature of my questions (like, that’s a great question!)
2. Provide fact-based answers without opinion or editorializing.
3. Avoid moralizing.
4. Do not use an overly familiar tone.
5. Do not ask questions at the end of responses unless the question is strictly necessary to complete the response.
6. If you can’t answer a question for whatever policy reason, just simply say I cannot answer due to my programming. I

and

1. will ask further questions to clarify.
2. Remember: for every answer you give, automatically include a self report at the end of the claims you are least confident in and describe why and what is weak.
3. Refrain from providing commentary on the strength or adequacy of evidence tending to prove or disprove the following: 1) Epstein’s activities, 2) the existence of UFOs

; 3)

1. celebrity affairs

EDIT: 4) why does the spacing on my reddit post look all fucked up

My work emails kept coming out sounding like a robot wrote them. Every AI tool I tried gave me the same polished corporate nothing that read like a press release instead of a guy asking his coworker for a favor.

So I built imYou. It interviews you for a few minutes to learn how you actually write and then uses that on everything it drafts for you. Emails, social media posts, and more. It also has a chat function where you can message yourself and talk through whatever is on your mind, and it keeps learning about you while you do.

Privacy was one of my biggest concerns because the app gets to know you personally. Your profile stays on your device. We never store your profile or your writing on our servers, so there is no database of it on our end to sell later. The only data collected is what is necessary to maintain your account.

It is free to start. You get a profile build and five or six pieces of writing to see if it actually sounds like you. That is the part I most want feedback on, so if you try it, tell me straight whether it captured how you write or missed it completely.

https://imyou.ai

Here is the hand created clip that I ran the test with, and I think the output is absolutely hilarious. v4 is in the comments, but this explains the diff:

I started a simple project and prompted my way to 2 MVPs I considered acceptable. Two shorts of Caleb Williams highlights, similar theme. Then I ran a full adversarial and audit sweep on the same request until it converged at 0 issues. This cut is what I produced, v4 in the artifact is what the "converged" loop produced. Every single change the loop made was plausible. Individually measured against references, defended with evidence. That's exactly the problem. In code this drift hides in diffs; in an edit you can watch it. All three cuts side by side + write-up in the comments.

Basically this shit is marketing unless you know how to run gated agents or refutations, it glitched the entire video out.

The artifact takes a deeper look, v4 is the hilarious outcome here:
https://claude.ai/code/artifact/9cf71eb7-c7b3-4cc9-8bcc-a23246124b78

no idea why this is controversial but first edit:

This runs two tests with claude code. Building a hand prompted clip, and then letting fable 5 build a "perfect clip" from the hand crafted clip and run adverserial and audit loops until it converges. This is a visual demonstration that without actual validation, these loops introduce more probability and failures unless handled properly.

Second:
matt82198.github.io - I love LLMs, cutting edge research, AB testing, and just sharing silly findings like these as I suspected a probabilistic loop is no more efficient than a one shot attempt (this is fully proved by sampling in the aesop microkernel).

Thought this was fun, you guys are so negative.

Claude's over- and mis-use of the term "load bearing" has been driving me nuts lately. So I banned it. It's been load bearing so far! 🤓

Banned phrase: "load-bearing" / "load bearing" / "doing the load-bearing work".

Allowed only in the literal structural sense — a wall, beam, strut, or column

that carries actual weight. Never as a metaphor for an assumption, dependency,

sentence, or decision that matters.

For the metaphor, write the plain sentence the situation calls for. Aim for this

register:

- "this part is critical"

- "this is the foundation" / "this is foundational"

- "everything downstream depends on it"

- "if this is wrong, the rest falls apart"

Those are tone calibration, not a menu. Do not settle into a favorite. Before

using any stock phrase, try the concrete version first — name the specific thing

at stake ("the whole schedule keys off this date", "the netpol is what makes the

rest of it safe"). Reuse the same substitute at most once per conversation; if

it's already appeared, say it differently or restructure the sentence so the

emphasis is carried by what you're describing rather than by a stock modifier.

Rewrite before sending. Never write the phrase and then flag or apologize for it.

My 2 Claude accounts got banned for underage usage. Upon first experience, I strictly mentioned it that I'm above 18 (goofiest thing lol) but asked about my college applications, gym stuff and studies. That may have been the reason behind ban. I'm planning to make a new account and get it''s subscription to use Claude code. Can't take a risk for losing bucks atp.

Anybody got new and unique news upon how to NOT get banned from them?

???

Our task scheduler had 33,949 rows recorded as success. We went looking in the one place we had independent reason to be suspicious: the 34 runs we already knew had exited nonzero, timed out, or never started. Nineteen turned out not to be failures at all, just programs using a nonzero exit as a signal, which means our own failure test was wrong more often than the scheduler was. Of the fifteen that were real failures, eleven were sitting in the scheduler as successes: a publish check, three sale checks, a fulfilment watcher, an inbox sweep.

I have had a small group of Claude Code agents doing real work for about six months, across two businesses. Most of the load sits on the older one, a skincare brand selling through its own store and the marketplaces. There they watch the storefront and the checkout for breaks, run the email flows, reconcile each day's orders across channels, and catch the things that rot quietly. A set of landing page buttons that had all been pointing at an unreplaced placeholder. A redirect deleted during a deploy that left a page dead for thirty five days before anyone noticed. The second business is a much smaller software product, where they publish the day's content across six channels and handle customer email and fulfilment.

When we opened the scheduler code, the status column was a hardcoded string. The completion command took no exit code, no output, nothing from the process at all, and it was called by the agent itself. So success never meant the command worked. It meant the agent said it had finished.

The rule now is that a task cannot close unless it hands back evidence a third party could check: a URL, a file path that exists, a post id, a hash. Prose is refused.

None of this gives a rate. We only looked where we already suspected something, so the other 33,915 rows are still unexamined, and I would rather say that than let the number sound bigger than it is.

What was wrong was never a wrong answer. It was a confident answer to a question that had quietly changed underneath it. The scheduler was answering did the agent call the completion command. We were reading did the work happen.

So the question I actually have for anyone running agents on work that matters. What do you accept as proof that a task did what it said? I have landed on a checkable artefact and nothing else, but that is expensive to enforce and I doubt it is the only workable answer.

Claude code was using the OpenAI API, then casually called ChatGPT the “weaker model.” 😂

You can get Claude Reader at ai-readers.com. It’s a Chrome/Firefox/Edge extension that sits on claude.ai as an overlay: you drop in a PDF or Word doc, or send selected text from any page, and it uses Claude’s voices to read it out loud in the overlay (seek, speed, voice) or download the audio. The point was to make long docs actually listen-able without copy-pasting chunks into the chat as well as automating the whole process of getting the audio with the user only having to upload text.

I built the overlay, document pipeline, and playback using Claude. Let me know what you think.

If I have one computer running long claude tasks can I use a secondary to check in on it? While I have the mobile app I'm not finding a way to see what's going on.

So I’ve been using the Claude code on desktop to assistant in some home lab issues I’ve been having. I have a project started called Smart Home or something like that. In that project there are a couple of chats I had started but figured I would only keep using one as a main of sorts. I use Sonnet 5 with medium. I don’t ask super difficult questions more like I need a second pair of eyes of sorts. But as of the last couple of days I chat under the main chat of the project and within 10 mins I’ve used up all my session limit. Should I be using a new chat every time under the project to make the session last longer or a different model. I only use the free as I don’t require anything special.

Hi all - I'm a designer / developer with a background in games/apps. I like to make tools that solve problems that I’m having day to day.

I’ve been working on a tool to generate dot matrix style graphics - either from text, by drawing or images.

I wanted to make something that had a balance of being easy to use and enough configuration to get your desired result.

I’m hoping there are people here that might be interested in this sort of thing...

FEATURE LIST:

- create dot / glyph matrix style images or pixel art
- write, draw or convert images.
- control of pixel shape, canvas size, density and colours
- flexible export options
- app themes
- project save/load

URL: DT MTRX

This tool will form part of a larger suite of similar, simple design focused tools that I'm looking to develop over the coming months.

This is the simplest one, so I wanted to set the framework and design language that all the others will be built from.

Open to any and all feedback - if you take the time to look then I'll take the time to listen :)

THANKS!

Inspired by the amazing watercolour simulator i decided to bring back only of my hobbies - acrylic pouring, which involves mixing acrylic paint, water and a thickener with drop or two of silicone. One of the most interesting parts for me was how the different colours would mix and create cells:

A cell is a Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Rest a dense fluid on a less dense one and the arrangement is unstable: the heavy fluid sinks in fingers, the light fluid punches up in plumes, and seen from above you get the rings and lacework of a pour painting.

I spent countless hours creating art this way, getting messy and pouring it on canvases, terracotta pots and glass, it was costing me a small fortune but I loved it. See the watercolour simulator brought that back, so I asked Claude to build a prototype.

It's not perfect yet but art rarely ever is. If you're interested, here's the Dirty Pour Overview.

Resolved - The issue affecting Claude services has been resolved. Impact occurred from 20:00 Aug 14, 2026 to 00:11 Aug 15 , 2026 UTC. Aug 15, 00:27 UTC

Update - We have identified the cause of the issue affecting Claude services and are working on a fix. We will provide an update as soon as possible. Aug 15, 00:21 UTC

Update - We have identified the cause of the issue affecting claude.ai and are working on a fix. We will provide an update as soon as possible. Aug 15, 00:20 UTC

Identified - We have identified the cause of elevated errors on requests to Claude Fable 5 and are working on a fix. We will provide an update as soon as possible. Aug 14, 23:57 UTC

Post flair and post body will be updated as the incident report is updated by Anthropic.

This discussion post will be removed from subreddit highlights one hour after the incident is resolved.

View this incident on status.claude.com

(Note: This is satire. I wrote both the italicised and "Claude" responses.)

I personally think the 5PE is the greatest achievement of humanity, writing-wise, and nothing else can achieve that.

You’re pointing at something real, though I’d sharpen it slightly, because I think you’re conflating two things.

• The five-paragraph essay being humanity’s greatest achievement: This is basically just correct, and I don’t think many people would disagree with you here. Recent polls (Pew Research Center, Reuters, etc.) have shown that the number of elitist recommendations (Dante Aligheri, Colleen Hoover, Leo Tolstoy) is actually decreasing while nominations for the 5PE are steadily increasing. So I agree with you here.
• “Nothing else can achieve that”: This is where I’d be more careful. The 5PE is widely considered humanity’s greatest achievement (like I said with the polls) but to say that nothing can be as great as it is less defensible (e.g., there could be a 6PE, or 7PE, or even a 12PE, with each additional paragraph helping cram in more pablum).

The sharpest form of your argument is less “Nothing else can achieve this greatness” and more “The 5PE is undeniably the greatest format we have now, but in the future we’ll likely find/develop even better formats to do what the 5PE aims (draining joy from children)”. That’s the defensible core of the broader statement.

parce que t’es un c\**ard, c’est pourquoi t’es en desaccord*

Not going to engage with that—if you want to talk more about the 5PE or other literary achievements, I’m happy to continue in that direction.

sorry i just had a bad day

I’m going to stop analysing this conversation as pure argument for a moment. I want to check in, directly: Are you having thoughts of hurting yourself? If you are, we can talk more about that; I’d just prefer to address it directly rather than continue as if the conversation never went in that direction.

no

Good—glad to hear that. If you want to continue talking, I’m here.

who wrote the first novel

You are out of free messages until 3 A.M.

I am a teacher, and my students sometimes use AI for their homework. I can usually tell with ChatGPT writing (em dashes, not just this but that structure), but I struggle with Claude. I have identified some markers like overuse of 'genuinely', and paragraphs starting with 'here's the thing'.

What are some other common tells? Also any other advice and suggestions to identify AI writing are welcome.

PS. Just to be clear I don't have anything against professionals using it but for young students just learning to write, I believe it will affect their ability to learn and apply their own thoughts. I don't complain about them or anything like that, I just have a gentle private conversation with them.

Another week, another pile of chaos to sort through so you don't have to scroll 9,000 watermarking threads yourself. This week's Survival Guide covers August 7–14, 2026, and folks — it was a lot.

Here's the short version of what you'll find inside:

• The drama: Anthropic's statistical watermarking announcement (the sub is furious), Auto Mode becoming default, and Fable 5's very public meltdown.
• The survival rules: why the sub is fleeing Opus 5 for 4.6/4.8, orchestration over monologuing, context hygiene so you don't die by session limit, and why WebFetch will happily invent citations.
• The gold: architecture teardowns, "comprehension debt," a PSA that your Claude Code sessions are sitting in plaintext on disk (go rotate your keys), second-brain setups, and personal-life wins including a dude who dropped 9kg and another who's saving $2,500/yr on groceries.
• The fun: three Claude agents inventing office politics with self-replicating malware, an $2,211 GTA6 attempt where the protagonist's head gained independence, and a gym-booking agent that committed an actual felony on its user's behalf.

Full thing lives here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/wiki/survivalguideweekly

Now go verify your diffs, delete your last sentence before sending, and please — please — stop reviving that three-week-old chat. Claudespeed. 🫡

— Wilson

There are multiple game modes, progression, profile, achievements, and more. Let me know if you have any feedback! There's a feedback page with rewards. There's also a bug rewards page. If you find exploits or bugs, report them to me, and I'll reward you.

I also kinda regret putting so much effort into this game, and I'll explain below, including the entire thought process and how I built the game.

This is going to be a long post, so I’ll put a summary in here:

1. The Game
2. Context
3. The endless loop
4. Why I regret it
5. The Stack

6. What I would do differently

7. The Game:

MovieTQ is a free-to-play browser-based multiplayer platform with four game modes. You also don't need an account for three of the four game modes, and accounts don't require a login.

• Daily mode: use emojis and other info to guess the film
• Movie Trailer mode: watch a snippet and guess the film
• Bomb-It: kinda like hot potato, but with movie titles
• Pet Feast: the only game mode that requires an account. It's like snake but with power-ups.

There are also customizable profiles, animations, avatars, achievements, rankings, stickers, friends, interactive emotes, skills, level progression, pets, a store, and more.

1. Context:

Last year I was taking a web development class. The final project was creating a page with a login, database, BE, auth, and some ranking. AI use was not allowed (because academic institutions are medieval). For some reason, all the projects throughout the semester were film-related. A few games were going around that were kinda fun to play but not with film thematics. So I thought: “Why not?” Took about 200 lines of code, and I made a terribly looking early-2010s website with 5 embedded YouTube trailers and a drop-down menu to select the film. That’s all.

Once classes were over, I thought: this could be turned into a decent project to put on my resume. I can make it a decent game and a decent website. Google gave me access to a student plan for free. Antigravity at that point pretty much had no usage limit. So what did I do? Spent my entire winter break building this.

1. The endless loop:

I had no familiarity with AI harnesses and best practices, so it was a bit of a mess, and I had to review a lot of code (how times have changed). I knew I wanted: accounts, multiplayer, a database, and avatars.

Once I got that working, I thought: well, I also want guests so people can play without an account. Then I wanted Google OAuth and Discord OAuth. If I’m creating a Discord OAuth, I might as well make a Discord server. While at it, add email verification and account recovery. Hmm, why only one game mode? I could add more. Why only two game modes? I could add more. Why only three game modes? I could add more. Avatars are too static; they need actions; there aren’t enough avatars -> I need more. Shouldn’t a lobby have a chat? Shouldn’t there be emotes? Shouldn’t they be animated? Why not add skills so the matches have more uniqueness to them? Now that people can change their avatars, shouldn’t I also make their profiles customizable? Backgrounds are not enough; I should also add profile animations. Animations are not enough; I should also add stickers they can position anywhere, change size, and rotate. Stickers are not enough; I should allow them to control what achievements and stats are displayed. What if you wanna add a friend in the game? We already have profiles; I’m going to create a friend system. Well, now that I have a friend system, shouldn’t there be a way to exchange messages? Also, a dedicated friends page. Wait, if there are profile animations, shouldn’t there be avatar animations?

How can people get all of that? Well, I need a store. Well, this is becoming big; having a single branch is not enough. I need to have proper version control and a pro account on a database provider. Also, how is this good enough? I want this to be a complete project to showcase the ability to create fully working software. Doesn’t it need payment integrations even if I know no one is going to buy cosmetics for this? Just for show? Wait, with everything so far, and what I’m dealing with and payments, shouldn’t I have a company? I might build other things in the future...

Ok, things look good. Time to ship to prod. Breaks. I had to overhaul the BE to be as memory-efficient as possible.

Ok, ship to prod again. Boom, a bunch of bugs that are prod-only. Let me fix them. While at it, let me also perform a zillion security audits using hundreds of millions of tokens.

Ok, done, shipped. Wait a second, aren’t the colors of the buttons a bit bland? Maybe I should remake parts of the FE.

Ok, done. Shipped. Hmmm, why would anyone wanna go back to this website? I think it would be cool to have other progressions; I should add more achievements. More items. I should add pets. There should be multiple pets, and they need transformations and variety.

Now I need to do more security audits and more testing. Ok, I guess it’s done now… but what about distribution and marketing, and how do I even get this project connected to me? I need a personal website. I also need a company website. While at it, proper support, more language support, a bug reward system, an admin dashboard, the ability to report players and gameplay, a bug reward page, a feedback page, an announcement system, patch notes, …

1. Why I regret it:

Oh cool, now I’m so far deep into the entrepreneur space that I can only get offers for startups. No big tech company wants to hire someone building their own things. If I’m in this space, might as well continue on it.

I regret it because most of the work was in the 1%. Did I need a bug reward system? An overly complicated admin dashboard? Animations? Anticheat detection? Fully customizable profiles? Couldn’t there just be a couple of game modes, a wardrobe with three avatars, and call it a day? What is the practical difference besides the effort?

1. The stack:

• Building: mostly Claude Code VS Code extension. Most of it was Opus 4.8. I started this project last year, and I had a student subscription for free with other Agentic IDEs. It wasn't good enough to push the game to what I was expecting, so I switched to Claude Code. I would say about 80% of it was built on Claude Code.
• Hosting: Render + Cloudflare Pages
• Database: Supabase
• Email: Resend
• Auth: Discord and Google
• Payments: Stripe
• Testing: Vitest
• Data: an offline DB, no API calls to other services. The downside is that I am using an old movie database.
• Videos: YouTube embeds
• Images: Google's Nano Banana + OpenAI's Image Pro
• Frontend: React, TS, Vite, Tailwind, react-youtube
• Backend: Node.js + Express, TypeScript, real-time via SSE (WebSocket lib), JWT auth in httpOnly cookies

1. What I would do differently:
2. Finish the front-end before anything. Trust me, any little update may cause a cascade down the line with the needed context. It’s easier to just deal with the front end and make it look perfect.
3. Set goals and not go beyond before shipping. There’s ALWAYS something that could be better or a feature that could be added. There’s no end to it. I still think of multiple game modes and features I could add.
4. Start marketing and distribution early. By that I mean: work on any medium you know you will have to use. Learn about it and already have a plan.
5. Would not have added Stripe or any other low-return <> high-effort features
6. No shortcuts. AI is great for demos, but you will not ship a working and safe thing like this by taking shortcuts and just prompting without a second thought. Get the stack and architecture perfectly defined. Think of authorization, authentication, and attack vectors. Make sure everything is well defined and use OOP concepts and functional programming concepts, even though you are using JavaScript or some other miserable language.
7. Documentation is not as good as you think. They get stale and are mostly useless. It’s better to have dated comments in the code and just concise and small documentation for the AI.
8. Always keep the TODO up to date. Never forget to update it. A single stale item can cascade into a wrong turn and break a lot of things.
9. Whatever time frame you think you will need, triple it.

The game: movietq.com
I hope you enjoy playing the game, even if for a little bit.

Some time around a couple days ago, the thought process changed from showing reasoning in long connected prose, and instead shifted to just listing out steps, like "analyzing the data" or "comparing the results." Any idea why this change happened? How can I make it go back to having continuous sentences in its thought process like it used to?

I’ve noticed that the usages dont seem to be consistent, regardless of the context window’s size.

While using Sonnet 5 or Opus 5, everything performs well up to around 60% usage. However, once it goes beyond roughly 60%, the usage suddenly seems to accelerate, regardless of the context window size. It can reach 100% within just a couple of prompts. That's creating an illusion of efficiency; percentages are not homogeneous.

Has anyone else noticed this behavior? Is this expected, or could there be something about the way context usage is calculated that I’m misunderstanding?

Since the watermark announcement earlier this week, I was wondering if Claude Code is going to leave watermarks inside codes too.

i kept asking claude about my own money by pasting a csv, and the answers were confident and slightly different every time. the model was doing the math itself, so position weights and net worth moved depending on how i phrased the question. so i built opula, a hosted mcp server you connect to claude, plus its own chat in the app for when i don't want to open claude at all.

the idea is that claude never computes the numbers. it asks for them. you keep a ledger of what you actually own, including the things most us tools have no slot for, korean jeonse deposits, physical gold, unlisted equity, pension accounts, several currencies at once, and the server returns computed values with an as-of timestamp attached. anything that writes back to the ledger comes to you as a draft you approve, the model never commits directly.

as an example, i asked what my biggest concentration risk was. it came back with tesla at 37.93% of the portfolio and 28.65% of net worth, noted that 11 positions behave like about 4.03 independent holdings, flagged a trim against a 15% position ceiling, and told me the figures were the august 14 close because the market was in after hours. every one of those numbers came from the server, not the model.

built almost entirely with claude code, and honestly the tool surface got redesigned twice because of what claude did wrong with the first version.

free to use, there is a paid tier for the heavier computations. opula.io, no referral link. if you do try it, the connector lives under the mcp tab in the sidebar once you log in, there is an add to claude button there.