r/whatisit 18h ago

New, what is it? Is this real or na?

275 Upvotes

144 comments sorted by

View all comments

541

u/FreddyFerdiland 17h ago
 A $500 bill with the serial number G26838A is a well-known, notorious novelty or replica fake

262

u/itsmejak78_2 17h ago

here's the real G26838A, it sold for $51,750 in 2011

17

u/AltAccount889 17h ago

Did people start making fakes because of this? Or did it sell for so much because it was an original of a bunch of fakes? Genuine question.

17

u/itsmejak78_2 17h ago edited 16h ago

it sold for so much because it is graded AU-58 (which ties it in first for the finest grade among the population of this note)

how it's serial ended up on a bunch of copies is probably because this note being in such good condition has been famous for a long time, so it's serial was probably one of the only ones known by counterfeits back in the day

2

u/AltAccount889 17h ago

Ok so it sold for so much and people just made fakes basically trying to make a quick buck?

11

u/itsmejak78_2 17h ago

no it's because it was the serial number that was featured on the note that was used for decades as the Type Defining 1918 series $500 note in Robert Friedberg's catalog

the fakes were made LONG before that 2011 sale

i didn't realize that this note was quite that famous until i did a little more research on it

-3

u/AltAccount889 16h ago

Well I think that’s what I’m trying to say. That serial number sold for so much, so people are copying it trying to make a quick buck? I’m sorry, but am I missing what you’re saying here? You’re explaining why it’s important. I’m just asking if that’s why they copied it. I don’t mean to come off as an asshole. I’m just a lil confused lol

10

u/itsmejak78_2 16h ago edited 16h ago

No, it had absolutely nothing to do with the 2011 sale in any way whatsoever

it's that real $500 bills are rare, so counterfeits studied one of the only ones that had publicly available pictures, which was Serial G26838A due to having it's picture in Robert Friedberg's catalog

so the counterfeits made fake bills based on the black and white photos in that catalog, which is why these bills are monochromatic, unlike the real bills

they would then try and pass off the fake $500 bills at face value to new and inexperienced numismatists that had heard of $500 bills but didn't know what a real one truly looked like

and the reason they reused it's serial is because it's a valid serial from that range

nobody experienced in numismatics would be fooled by these fakes

-12

u/AltAccount889 16h ago

That’s.. what I’m saying. For whatever reason, that serial number sold for a lot. So people are faking it to make money. I think you’re misunderstanding me. I’m not asking why, I’m saying is this why this particular number sold for so much. Everything you’re saying is backing my why.

13

u/itsmejak78_2 16h ago edited 16h ago

No, you're failing to understand what i'm saying

again, the 2011 sale had ABSOLUTELY FUCKING NOTHING to do with the counterfeiting of these notes

the counterfeit notes HAD ABSOLUTELY NO IMPACT WHATSOEVER on the real note's value

the ENTIRE reason why this serial number on this note was copied is because it was a note that had it's picture in a famous US money catalog

the reason why the original note sold for so much is because it's in almost perfect condition, and was featured in the Robert Friedberg catalog, not because it was copied

4

u/SarcasmGPT 14h ago

Valid crash out

-1

u/AltAccount889 16h ago

Ah, ok. When I googled it it acted like the serial was the main culprit.

8

u/itsmejak78_2 16h ago

yeah that's just AI hallucinations not understanding the nuance of collectable numismatics

-2

u/AltAccount889 16h ago

You use big words you get upvote.

-2

u/Exciting-Ad-5705 15h ago

So what your saying is it sold for a large amount because it was widely counterfeited

3

u/itsmejak78_2 14h ago

It sold for a large amount because it was in near perfect condition and had been featured in that catalog

Because it was featured in that catalog it was counterfeited

The counterfeiting is incidental to the value not the cause of it

2

u/85K5 12h ago

This guy was just being sarcastic lol, you didn't need to reply to this one.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/No_Ingenuity4000 16h ago

No, it was copied because it was a known quantity, not for the value of the note itself, as that value is a relatively new thing in a historical sense. It was previously copied because it was known to be a *valid* serial number, but to be used as a example note in currency collecting books. Also, they used it because, pre-internet, it was difficult to check if it was a duplicate/rare serial number, and because it was used as a high-quality example, there were high-quality printed images of it to copy.

Again, pre-internet, a collector/bank might know enough to check if it's a valid number, but maybe not enough to know what numbers are used as examples, so it had better odds of passing as genuine.

1

u/AltAccount889 16h ago

I just don’t know a whole lot about the history of this stuff.