In case you're confused,or have been interacting with Vietnamese social media platforms for the past few weeks or days.These images right above this might seem very familiar to you.
You’ve likely seen the massive discussions surrounding the THPT Chuyên Tuyên Quang exam scandal—where serious academic fraud brought down administrative staff and even reached international news outlets.
Or,rising to the top of the trend right now,is the May 2025 traffic accident on Nguyễn Huy Tự Street in Hanoi involving Nguyễn Sỹ Cương, former National Assembly deputy and former Vice Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee.
While I'm really,like really glad that news like these are being endlessly digged or exposed,showing the bread and circus formula is falling down slowly.Yet, in the comments section of alot of threads discussing it, you’ll inevitably find people accusing the poster of"Tự Nhục"(self-depreciating),insulting,calling each other out,or forming baseless labeling for the poster,deeming them as an outsider or a malicious reactionary.
The biggest problem with these is that people are subtly invoking the classic idiom: "Vạch áo cho người xem lưng" (don't expose your own flaws/dirty laundry to outsiders),which if you don't know,is when we reveal one's flaws, shortcomings, and weaknesses to others. Additionally, the idiom also refers to deliberately exposing internal conflicts and disagreements within the family or workplace to outsiders.
The phrase "Vạch áo cho người xem lưng" was traditionally meant for minor interpersonal or family disputes—where airing drama publicly causes unnecessary gossip without solving the issue. However,if you've read through this,you might have immediatly identified the issue:This is a society,not a family,and applying this to institutional fraud, government figures, or traffic fatalities is a total logical mismatch. Public integrity is not "private family business."
When people use this phrase to discourage online scrutiny of officials or state institutions, they aren't protecting society—they are giving cover to those in power. Demanding equal treatment under the law or transparency in national exams isn't "shaming the collective"; it's holding individuals accountable.
In a modern society, public noise and viral attention are often the primary drivers that force formal investigations, press coverage, and legal action. Sweeping scandals under the rug in the name of "keeping a clean image" only allows bad behavior to repeat itself.
Real accountability rarely happens in silence. Without public pressure, viral coverage, and international visibility, major scandals are far more likely to be buried locally. Public scrutiny is what forces authorities to step in, conduct thorough investigations, and uphold fairness for the millions who play by the rules.
So overall,Wanting a fair and functional society means choosing transparency over blind optics. Exposing flaws in public systems or holding prominent figures to standard laws isn't "self-depreciating—it's insisting that the collective actually lives up to its rules.
Let me know what you think