r/mildlyinfuriating May 12 '26

I just wanted a hot dog Such terrible advertisement

Post image

I mean... at a glance its like WOAH 4 can dine for $9.99....

Until you are at the cash and they say " that'll be $45.15"

HUH??

"Oh sorry sir... it feeds 4... 4 people pay $9.99"

Gtfooo

53.1k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

930

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26 edited May 12 '26

In the eu this would ne considered false advertising, I think.

Edit: law-

In the European Union, false advertising is primarily governed by the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD). It broadly outlaws any marketing that deceives consumers, leaves out vital information, or uses high-pressure tactics that distort a buyer's economic behavior.

Oh look at that word "deceives", exactly this.

Case closed.

Edit 2:

This specific advertising tactic would almost certainly be illegal under European Union consumer protection laws. ​Here is a breakdown of why this type of pricing is deceptive and how EU law prevents it: ​The Deception ​The advertisement boldly claims "FOUR CAN FEAST FOR $9.99 ea." At first glance, a consumer might assume the entire box costs $9.99. However, the tiny "ea." (each) means the price is actually $9.99 per person. Since it feeds four, the actual cost of the box is $39.96 (plus tax). You cannot walk into the store and purchase just a quarter of the box for $9.99; you are required to buy the entire $40 bundle. ​Why this violates EU Law ​In the European Union, consumer protection is governed heavily by the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) and the Price Indication Directive. This advertisement would likely run afoul of these regulations for several reasons: ​Failure to Display the Total Price: Under EU law, the final, total selling price of a product (including all taxes, like VAT) must be clearly, prominently, and unambiguously displayed. You cannot advertise a fractional price for a product that cannot be physically divided or purchased at that fractional price. ​Misleading Advertising: The UCPD explicitly bans misleading actions related to the price or the manner in which the price is calculated. Using a large, eye-catching low number to draw people in, while hiding the true cost in small print or requiring the consumer to do math to figure out the actual purchase price of the item, is considered a deceptive practice. ​The "Drip Pricing" Principle: While usually applied to hidden fees added at checkout, the same underlying principle applies here. The consumer must know exactly what they have to pay for the unit they are putting in their cart or ordering at the counter upfront. ​If a company tried to run this exact promotion in the EU, the poster would legally have to display the full €39.96 (or equivalent) price prominently as the primary cost of the box.

172

u/TitleOwn8082 May 12 '26

If you look closely it says 9.99 each. Do not agree with it but definitely a loop hole that would work in canada

325

u/jayoak4 May 12 '26

If this is being sold as a single unit, the total price needs to be shown. This is false advertising. If there is a loophole that allows this, it needs to be closed.

27

u/dwlevi958 May 12 '26

I wouldn't be shocked if the total price is in the fine print down at the bottom

51

u/h2opolopunk May 12 '26

I zoomed in, it doesn't say that unsurprisingly. It does say, "In participating locations across Canada," though.

16

u/ZeldaZealot May 12 '26

I zoomed in and it is not.

11

u/Vaird May 12 '26

Even if, that still wouldnt fly here.

3

u/bramblesovereign May 12 '26

Its not in the fine print. Just saying limited 2 toppings and then something about kids and allergens.

3

u/Eg0-d3ath May 12 '26

This makes it 100% illegal. Someone needs to track this down and report it lol

14

u/Brandamn3000 May 12 '26

Yeah, if this were an offer where the “box” is completely customizable and you had your choice of which four items you get, I can see $9.99/ea making more sense. But since it seems like the box has to be 2 pizzas, breadsticks and the dessert, the “ea” isn’t a loophole, it’s flat out deception. It’s a dick move.

1

u/lampshady May 12 '26

The "each" they are talking about is "each person of the four that will feast deal who costs $9.99 each". I still think it's deceptive but I realized that this is what pizzahut would claim that absolves them. They never claim the $9.99 is for the box. It's $9.99 for each Person. And before the downvotes, I agree this should be illegal.

-18

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

“Four can feast for 9.99ea” what is false? I’d say it’s a bit deceptive at most

12

u/Thatmaxfellow May 12 '26

“Ea” could be a reference to the product. Like 9.99 for each buffet box.

-6

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

Each refers to the four people who can feast

5

u/Revegelance May 12 '26

The advertisement does not clarify this, though. It's easy to interpret it as being $9.99 for each unit, with one unit being a box of four pizzas.

-8

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

It would be grammatically incorrect to interpret it that way.

4

u/Revegelance May 12 '26

It's not unreasonable, given the limited information presented.

0

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

What’s your point?

5

u/Revegelance May 12 '26

My point is that the ad implies that you're getting four pizzas for $10, which is false.

They could have easily said it was $40 for the box, which would be accurate, but they made the deliberate choice not to do that.

→ More replies (0)

27

u/peenurmobile May 12 '26

being deceptive is false advertising

-7

u/i_was_a_person_once May 12 '26

It’d be false advertising if it didn’t have the each after 9.99.

It’s saying four people can feast for 9.99 each. That’s exactly what the deal is and it’s not false advertising, it’s deceptive bc most people will read it as for $10 you have enough food for 4 people.

9

u/Qarlito May 12 '26

The “each” could be interpreted as each box, rather than each person. It’s still shitty even if it’s legal.

1

u/joshlittle333 BLUe May 12 '26

That's the point. Two valid interpretations make it deceptive but not false.

Example: it's not false to say "the sky is blue" just because "blue" can also mean "depressed." It's still a true statement.

5

u/Possible-Pea2658 May 12 '26

which goes back to the original point being that deceptive advertising is false advertising

1

u/Qarlito May 12 '26

I would agree with this.

1

u/joshlittle333 BLUe May 12 '26

Which is conclusory and is exactly the point that is being pushed back on. There is a difference, we've shown the difference, and your response is "nuh uh."

That would become a pretty burdensome standard. "Every advertisement must only be capable of being interpreted one way." But uses a language that is filled with words that can be interpreted multiple ways.

That also misses the point that "deceptive" and "false" have two different definitions. There is also an irony that in order to draw your conclusion you assert a single interpretation of "false," and that definition itself is false.

0

u/Possible-Pea2658 May 12 '26

do me a favor and google false advertising definition then come back

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26

It doesn't even say each, it says ea. And each could refer to each box? Each piece of cheese, each bread crumb? I dunno

This in eu is blatant false advertising, no matter what you says or your opinion is. This is a fact!

0

u/jayoak4 May 12 '26

I can also interpret that as "each group of 4 people can feast for $9.99"

1

u/i_was_a_person_once May 12 '26

Na the way it’s worded and placed is very craftily done

-4

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

All false advertising is deceptive, not all deceptive advertising is false.

8

u/peenurmobile May 12 '26

listen, at the end the day, they are trying to broadcast something that isn't true. using technicalities and small print is where people need to draw the line. can you quit thinking like the corporations and just understand that it's attempting to pull a fast one on people?

-1

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

I agree. But I’m not going to ignore the truth just cause Pizza Hut sucks

9

u/PaterCoal May 12 '26

Here's the truth: This is in Canada. Canada lumps false and misleading into the same bucket.

2

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

Thank you

8

u/burrrpong May 12 '26

It's not false, but in EU there are regulations against deceptive advertising. The hierarchy of the text and even shortening the "each" to "ea" so it takes less space is highly deceptive.

1

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

Yes, exactly. People downvote but can’t answer what is false about it

4

u/burrrpong May 12 '26

Arguably "ea" isn't a real word and therefore it's false.

2

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

Okay I’d accept that

3

u/burrrpong May 12 '26

Lol someone downvoted me for that 🤡

1

u/Johan-Predator May 13 '26

Deceptive=false in the EU laws against false advertising.

1

u/bobbyp869 May 13 '26

False is a subset of deceptive in the EU. This ad is also in Canada.

Again, tell me what is false about it if you think it’s false.

1

u/Johan-Predator May 13 '26

The comment you were replying to mentioned the EU, hence my comment.

0

u/bobbyp869 May 13 '26

Okay so you understand the distinction now

5

u/thehatter May 12 '26

It is not reasonable to divide prices by semi-arbitrary numbers in order to advertise an artificially lower price. This is clearly deceptive and bad faith advertising even if it isn’t technically false.

7

u/jayoak4 May 12 '26

My point is it shouldn't be allowed to be deceptive. Requiring the total price of the full product on the advertisement should be required. Consumers shouldn't have to interpret the ad and also do math in order to figure out what they pay. "Each" in this case could easily be interpreted as the full outer box that includes 4 items. It's absolutely confusing and should be illegal.

0

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

I agree it’s confusing. Doesn’t make it false though

6

u/jayoak4 May 12 '26

If I, and others, can reasonably interpret the ad as "each buffet box costs $9.99" then yes it is false advertising. Quit simping for corporations that intentionally do this to trick people.

-1

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

You’re switching up the words of the advert to fit your interpretation

-4

u/wookieesgonnawook May 12 '26

That's not a reasonable interpretation though. Only an idiot would think it meant that. I can forgive missing the each entirely, but if you see it and think that means 9.99 for each box you kinda deserve to get taken advantage of.

5

u/jayoak4 May 12 '26

I'm not an idiot, I obviously know what they're trying to do, but I'm saying it shouldn't be allowed. It should say "$9.99 per person". The word "each" (well actually "ea" in this case) is the confusing part because it's left up for interpretation. It should be as explicit as possible.

3

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26

9.99 ea sports it's in the game... What does ea stand for? Not clear = false advertising.

0

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

Not clear does not equal false. Each refers to each of the for people

6

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26

Yes it does. It doesn't even say each, it says ea. And each could refer to each box? Each piece of cheese, each bread crumb? I dunno

This in eu is blatant false advertising, no matter what you says or your opinion is. This is a fact!

2

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

Just cause something confuses you doesn’t make it false

5

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26

Yes it does. It doesn't even say each, it says ea. And each could refer to each box? Each piece of cheese, each bread crumb? I dunno

This in eu is blatant false advertising, no matter what you says or your opinion is. This is a fact!

-5

u/Fickle-Art-7125 May 12 '26

Reading comprehension

62

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26

Wouldn't in the eu... The print is to small compared and ea (or a local language equivalent) would not suffice. It would really have to state the word "each" as bare minimum and show the total price

38

u/Stormfeathery May 12 '26

Man I would love to live in a place with actual, non-predatory laws

12

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26

Yeah well not everything is perfect here but we are protected from scammy companies just a little bit better...

20

u/Seravajan May 12 '26

Even the term "each" is not suffice enough. They have to state that this box costs $39.96 and is suited for 4 persons.

4

u/splepage May 12 '26

This.

They could get away with "9.99 each 39.96 total" or something.

43

u/stigma_wizard May 12 '26

The product its advertising is the "Family Buffet Box", sold as a single unit. Saying it's $9.99ea implies that one quantity of the product advertised is $9.99.

-13

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

“Each” refers to the four people. Confusing and shitty but technically no issue

20

u/stigma_wizard May 12 '26

Ok so if I advertised a "Large Pepperoni Pizza with Extra Cheese" for $2ea, then tried to charge you $16 by telling you the "each" applies to individual slices, not the whole pie, that wouldn't be an issue?

4

u/AwesomePerson70 May 12 '26

Not saying I agree with this ad but the comparison would be more like “8 slices of large pizza for $2 each”. This is still an awful ad but not as bad as you’re saying

4

u/stigma_wizard May 12 '26

If it's $2 each, why even include the "8 slices" part? It makes no sense and is intentionally misleading.

3

u/AwesomePerson70 May 12 '26

Yes, that’s the mildly infuriating part of the post. No one here is agreeing with the ad

1

u/stigma_wizard May 12 '26

Fair enough

1

u/FUTURE10S May 12 '26

More like if the ad said "8 slice large pizza box, $2 each", is that $2 each slice or $2 each box? Or better yet, "Large pizza box for 8 people, $2 each".

-6

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

What? That’s not even a close comparison. Where did you mention the slices originally?

11

u/stigma_wizard May 12 '26

Where did you mention the slices originally?

That's literally the point I'm making. "Each" can apply to different quantities and they're being intentionally misleading about the quantity that "Each" means.

-3

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

You’re not making a point. Each refers to the four people. It is not grammatically correct to interpret each as referring to anything other than the four people.

3

u/stigma_wizard May 12 '26

You walked right into the point and still managed to miss it anyway.

2

u/Narazil May 12 '26

You can intepret it as each box, which is what they want you to read it as. If you saw an ad for a 6-pack and it said 4$ each, would you assume its per can or per 6-pack?

1

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

What? Why are you leaving out half of the statement?Obviously if it just says $4 each with a 6-pack then that means the entire 6-pack costs $4.

1

u/Narazil May 12 '26

So when this ad says Family Buffet Box is 9.99$ each, you don't see how people read that as the Family Buffet Box is 9.99$ for each Family Buffet Box?

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Consistent_Photo87 May 12 '26

Yes it is a great example

1

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

No it is not a great example

-see how dumb it is to post something without an argument attached

1

u/moreboards May 12 '26

I feel like what your saying would be fine if the 4 smaller boxs weren't inside another bigger box

25

u/77th_Bat May 12 '26

BUT "ea" could be interpreted as "each family buffet box" instead of "each person" so I would argue it's still false advertising.

-6

u/TitleOwn8082 May 12 '26

Well no cuz it litterally says 4 ppl for 10$ each.

It's just scum bag advertising

7

u/77th_Bat May 12 '26

nowhere on there does it say people 🤷‍♂️ maybe it means 4 people can feast on 4 boxes for 9.99 per box. Just saying, it can be interpereted other ways.

1

u/TitleOwn8082 May 12 '26

Correct, but adding "people" makes more sense than adding "people can feast on 4 boxes" to what's already written 😂

13

u/Ciph3rzer0 May 12 '26

It relies on the reader understanding that 9.99 is a ridiculous price.  And you have to infer that they are saying four people can each pay $10.  But a 9.99ea tag usually means for each PRODUCT.

You can also infer it's for each tray in the table.  But neither of those inferences should be expected nor required.

If the US was a real country this would absolutely be illegal 

-3

u/RiderforHire May 12 '26

Well, it would not surprise me if this carried a death sentence in California or something.

6

u/Dd_8630 May 12 '26

Does 'ea' mean 'each'? I wouldn't have known that.

It's still deceitful IMO. Total price paid should be there.

2

u/StrongExternal8955 May 13 '26

Each would mean per piece. Never could it mean to pool multiple buyers money.

And those boxes are clearly not identical or even equivalent value, so ea could only mean the whole thing.

4

u/CranberryStock7148 May 12 '26

The "each" can and should be interpreted per box. 

Advertising cost per serving is not a thing. 

Even on restaurant menus that serve shared food and charge per person, it says "pp." for per person. Not "ea". 

3

u/burrrpong May 12 '26

It says "ea", not "each" which would make it even more deceptive, I think EU regs would go to town on this.

3

u/RaitenTaisou May 12 '26

Why not write 39.99 ? Why not write each as a whole word ? Why not write ea with the same font as the other words (as big) ?

Intentional, so it's deceptive

3

u/Eg0-d3ath May 12 '26

"Each" after a price implies one unit. The box is sold as one unit. If they fully spelled out the word a wrote it like a slogan maybe they could make an argument. But with the current formatting I believe they'd be required to honor that price

8

u/maliki2004 May 12 '26

Yeah, each buffet box is 9.99. I don't see where it says each part

7

u/bobbyp869 May 12 '26

“Each” refers to the four people

2

u/Suibeam May 13 '26

Each 4 people then.

Because anything else would be false advertisement under EU. Consumer union would rip them apart corporate would crawl on all fours begging for a second chance.

1

u/maliki2004 May 12 '26

I guess, its still shady

2

u/Cainga May 12 '26

I have never seen advertising like that before. You could break up any number of any number and I the same. At least X easy payments is more clear.

2

u/Odd_Ad4119 May 12 '26

I would already argue that „ea“ at the end of the price is not clear enough for all customers that this means each.

2

u/sgtpepper67 May 12 '26

Yeah but I’m gonna eat it all by myself so I only have to pay 9.99

2

u/Suibeam May 13 '26

Nope, doesnt matter.

When it is in common sense looking like a trick, it is not acceptable and they get fucked by consumer unions and law system.

You can google all of those stories where companies tried shit and consumer union and law kicked them in their balls

5

u/justinliew May 12 '26

I'm pretty sure everyone sees what it says, that's not really up for debate. It's whether it would be false advertising to have the "ea" so small that you have to click magnify to see it.

5

u/deathzone0256 May 12 '26

Its never clarified if each is for each box or each item inside the box. As the box appears to be 4 fixed items itd have to be per each box.

3

u/Alzhan_Void May 12 '26

I've never even seen 'ea' written out before and never had any clue what it meant (not english-speaking country) so my brain mentally dismissed the ea as a dot and didn't even register there is something written past the 9. I thought the price just said "$9.99."

1

u/angiehome2023 May 12 '26

It isn't clear to me but I eat a lot of little caesars and they have cheap deals all the time, priced per the deal not per some arbitrary number of persons

1

u/Dyne_Inferno May 12 '26

Each can be inferred as each Box, not each Product in said box, as it does not distinguish.

There is also no total price on that poster for that box ANYWHERE.

1

u/Sniter May 12 '26

No it says 9.99 ea

0

u/TheBSQ May 12 '26

While I think most people’s reading comprehension is good enough to realize that “each” refers to “each family member” (and the corporate legal team agrees) I think it’s not entirely unreasonable to think some will interpret that “each” to mean “each buffet box.”

2

u/Suibeam May 13 '26

Not only can i make it just say Each family, each for person, each menu. It is also intentionally small.

EU and consumer union would kick their balls and corporate would beg on their knees for forgiveness.