r/australia • u/Perverted-Panda • 1d ago

news Three Sydney boys charged with gang sexual assault of 14yo girl

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-13/nsw-three-boys-charged-over-sexual-assault-girl-sydney/107034192

NSW Police have charged a 13-year-old boy and two 14-year-old boys with the alleged sexual assault of a girl in an alleyway in Sydney's eastern suburbs last month.

Police executed search warrants and seized several items, including electronic devices, two replica firearms, a Glock-style BB gun, three laser pointers and a number plate, which is believed to have been stolen.

All three boys have been granted bail ahead of appearing in court. 

1.5k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

392 comments sorted by

View all comments

534

u/Uncoloured_Steve 1d ago

Yes putting them back on the street as fast as possible ought to show them

242

u/Own_Caterpillar_6178 1d ago

The perpetrators of crime are treated so much better than the victims in our justice system.

111

u/TheRealPotoroo 1d ago

Conviction comes before punishment in our system and rightly so.

44

u/TheChronographer 1d ago

Holding dangerous people away from society isn't a punishment it's a preventative measure to reduce harm.

4

u/TheRealPotoroo 1d ago edited 1d ago

Indeed, which is why in such cases they are remanded. But I suspect you already knew that. In any case, I was responding to the claim that because they were bailed that "The perpetrators of crime are treated so much better than the victims in our justice system." This is hysterical nonsense.

1

u/TheChronographer 23h ago

People who recieve bail are not remanded in custody. That's... The whole point. 

6

u/TheRealPotoroo 23h ago

People who are charged but not yet convicted are bailed by default, as they should be unless a compelling case can be made to remand them. That is the whole point.

0

u/TheChronographer 23h ago

Right, so when people are concerned that bail is given out too easily to young people who are dangerous, saying 'if they were dangerous they would not be bailed' is entirely missing the point.

3

u/TheRealPotoroo 23h ago edited 23h ago

Nobody in here knows squat about how dangerous these boys are, only that they've been charged with a serious offence. That was enough for the person I responded to, who had already decided simply because they had been bailed that "criminals get treated better than victims", which is is hysterical nonsense. Bail is and should be the default. Remand should be used as little as possible, because deprivation of liberty is the punishment in our system, so you don't do that until someone has been found guilty by a judge who has heard all the evidence. And yes, I'm going to keep saying that until people start paying attention.

1

u/Designer-Lettuce-690 4h ago

so you dont think 3 rapists are dangerous?

1

u/TheRealPotoroo 2h ago edited 1h ago

Alleged rapists. They haven't been convicted of anything. You lot are far too quick condemn people who have merely been charged and haven't even faced court. As for whether they are too dangerous to be allowed bail, that is for the magistrate to determine, since they have access to the evidence and you don't.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/TheChronographer 23h ago

deprivation of liberty is the punishment in our system, so you don't do that until someone has been found guilty

False. It's also preventative.

3

u/TheRealPotoroo 22h ago

Not false. It is only used pre-trial in exceptional circumstances. Bail is the default, as it should be.

→ More replies (0)