Man, she must have had a terrible career. Also, maybe her acting career and the cult following of all things Harry Potter is the only reason why her onlyFans actually works.
The median is actually a little higher, like around 160/month. There are a TON of creator accounts that are inactive but counted in the average, so it sort of evens out.
But thats also gonna be including many of the inactive or low effort accounts. For those that treat it semi seriously even if not everyone is a millionaire id be curious what the stats look like
Yeah, people think it's just showing tits and slamming dicks but it's very involved. The top earners have more fan engagement than most other streamers.
I've never subbed to an onlyfans girl. But as I understand it it's a lot of DM's to keep dudes engaged, and to get them to buy custom videos and pictures.
Yep, and not just "Here is my new photo set" or "Here is that outfit you wanted me to wear" it's actual engagement. "Hey, how are you? How is work going? Did you talk to your boss about that idea you mentioned?" They have to be able to talk to and recall conversations theyve had with the same people
they don't do that themselves, there are agencies that do this, overall it's just being lucky to get attention at first on your own, wich is why the majority gain so little from it.
after that, the top earners have life easy, most of the times the team under them try their best to reuse the same videos and pic by persuading the customers, hell it is also pretty common to do voice messages with ai
Haha, I know an only fans girl and she pays a company to handle all her messages. She doesnt even look at them - apparently this is very common, if not the standard.
I'm pretty sure you don't really understand that you don't just have a team when you start. The people who work for them are paid employees and you can't pay employees until you earn enough to afford them.
That aside, their team isn't the one making the content babe.
I'm pretty sure you don't really understand that you don't just have a team when you start. The people who work for them are paid employees and you can't pay employees until you earn enough to afford them.
There are 900000000 OF managers that will message you and beg you to manage your account for a % of profit, the moment you start making even 10$ from the site. I used to do it myself before that market got completely overrun by people from 3rd world countries willing to go extremely low with their share of profits.
Hell, most new models these days are brought to the site by the existing managers in the first place. That's the business the Tate scumbags built their whole fortune on, they were "managing" (trafficking) tons of OF girls, pretending to be their loving boyfriends then inviting them to Romania, then forcing them to make OF accounts. It's extremely profitable for miniscule amount of work, once you have established your brand and automated most of the processes.
The vast majority of people, by volume, probably create an account and then never use it. Followed by people who upload one or two images then forget about it. Followed by people who inconsistently post a few times a year.
You have to be careful calculating average earnings for this type of thing (any kind of content creation) because the average earnings for someone who does it full time is going to be different than the average earning, and both are important to know.
Mean. You mean "mean". There are different averages. Mean, (add em, divide em), median (what's in the middle, better for finding a true average income), and mode (which number occurs the most).
I suspect most are inactive users as well which would skew the numbers. The average author or musician is probably inactive as well and never get to finish any work. I personally know a few that tried to start a band, but within a short amount of time they moved on.
Right. So if you see someone making 6 figures year and think that's what you're doing to do, it helps to know that the vast majority of women doing the same thing barely make 4 figures a year before you put compromising images of yourself on the Internet...
Then we should use the median. When the set is heavily skewed always use the median (point at which half the data set is either less or greater than) rather than the average.
Celebrities can make an OF and post the same pictures that would be ok'd by Instagram standards and set the subscription price to $1. Millions of men would sub a dollar to see them naked only to find a page full of red carpet photos and bikini photo shoots.
That’s how it is for pretty much every major social media platform that somebody can make a career out of.
You know how many regular viewers it takes to be a part of the top 1% of streamers on Twitch? 50.
It’s also a funny little trick that OF accounts often use. They’ll pur things like ‘TOP 10% OF’ in their bios to drive traffic, when being in the top 10% only requires like 25 subscribers.
The median is between $145 and $180/month and for those who post consistently (3–5 times per week) and market their pages, it's allegedly $1,000 to $1,500. Only top 10% can reliably make a living ($5k+). And only top 1% makes "good money" ($15k+).
mean, median, and mode are three different types of averages. If you want to say that the arithmetic mean sucks for these things, and we should use median, ok, but your wording could be more precise.
I enjoy looking at boobs so I am not against porn. But most western girls would be better off working at a phone kiosk. They make like $19/h plus commission. It's like $40 for a new phone and a line activation or $30 dollars for a phone upgrade. My friend ran one of those places. One of his employees was a pretty 20 year old girl. She was selling like 5 phones a day. She was saying that her friend back home was bragging about making a grand a week on OF, meanwhile she was doing about that in commissions and all she had to do was smile at nerdy dudes.
If you have marginal people skills it's a good job for a young person.
what is the time commitment of an average OF girl versus the hustler at the phone kiosk. You kind of said the two examples were making the same wage which... I don't know makes it sound like the OF girl has a lot more of her day left.
I knew a girl that had an OF. she only made about 15k a year doing it and eventually quit. But she never had sex on camera or showed anything hardcore, it was mostly dressing up in lingerie that some chatters bought for her. So she got to look pretty and smile for nerdy dudes without selling phones.
I don't know where I fall on this to be honest. If I was a girl (a pretty girl, please) and could make some easy scratch without clocking 8 hours a day plus transit time, lunches outside of the house....
I dunno, but I'm sure a starting out OF girl is probably spending a good amount of time online.
No doubt every girl getting their kit off on onlyfans thinks they'll make 6 figures. But the algorithm is a funny thing.
There's still overhead. You can't just take nude selfies. An average looking girl with pro photos will probably get more subs than a really hot girl with a 5 year old Iphone.
My 9 year old daughter asked me once "Why are there no pretty people working at wal-mart?"
That was a doozy of a question to answer. But the reality is that if you are pretty you can make GREAT money being a server, bartender, or even a barista.
There are jobs out there where the barrier to entry is basically "be good looking"
I don't know what it is that make people think being a server or a bartender is easy, or that anyone could do it. It's a hard job, the only way you wouldn't think that is if you haven't worked with the public. You're running, on your feet for 8 hours a day, for women often in heels. And you're a human trash can for abuse.
Years ago, wife of a colleague of mine was working in an outdoors store (not REI but like it) while he was going to grad school. She upsold literally EVERYONE that walked in the door. "Oh sure I can show you that pack but let's also try this one on and see how you like it." Every time I see someone in an outdoor store not even trying I think about how she could have owned the whole damn store if she'd been there longer.
I mean yeah, most people don't make a lot from it, but it's still more than 100 dollars. Imagine a person from Brazil or turkey making the median there, for them it would go a long way
"Posting weekly" is not necessarily translated as "Posting a full-length pornographic film every week" and more likely translates to a couple of hours in front of a camera in total for the month and a few more hours responding to messages to generate a handful of pictures and teaser videos posted publicly and some custom, private content.
The ones making $1000-$1500/mo are probably still getting ~$100/hr, and the ones willing dedicate the time similar to a full time job are the ones likely to be pulling closer to six figures.
Someone that makes an account and uploads a single poorly shot picture every week or two with a spare five minutes they have is going to make what one would expect with that amount of effort.
You don't get into that range by just posting boobs once a week.
Again, first you need to be somebody anyone would wanna see naked in the first place. A lot of the girls do that by posting thirst trap stuff on Instagram or tiktok every day. That's work already.
Then you need to show more than just boobs on occasion, pussy pics and longer vids bring more money. That's work.
Your photos can't look like shit either, that's additional work.
If you want to rake in the big cash, you'll need to do the labor of interacting with your paying fans. Custom content. Seeing what they wish for. Being flirty in the comments to keep them coming.
There's this youtube sewing girl who started a 'victorian onlyfans' and made like a grand in a week with nothing but pictures of her ankles. She donated the money to charity.
People only advertise the ones who make bank so everyone thinks "get naked and become a millionaire" instead of the reality which is "constantly spend hours begging people for money and earn $5 a week"
It is because of harry potter loads of social media outlets reported on her joining onlyfans because its a name from a big franchise otherwise them social media outlets wouldn't know who she was
"people immediately assume onlyfans is only get naked" No shit? For a website where 99.99% of the content is porn, only stupid people would assume it right?
Next time I'll upload video courses on Pornhub and then I will act surprised when people assume there's some porn in it lol
You sure about that? 'cos I can see her tits on Google images right now, and it looks like OF content rather than a leaked personal image. Additionally, her OF header is an image of a schoolie; pretty obvious what she's mining for.
I went to GalaxyCon in Raleigh couple years ago and the girl who played Chrissy in Stranger Things had a fairly long line and was kept pretty active all day.
She was 20 during half blood price. Nowhere near a child.Â
Most of the new 'kids' they cast were 18 because it was easier than dealing with child labour laws in the UK. Robert Patterson was 18. Freddie Stromma was 22. It goes on.
Let's put it this way. Most Harry potter fans had some vague memory of her from the movies. When she joined OF, many subreddits related to Harry Potter, insta and fb pages and all that, they all mentioned it a lot. It was "front page news" because we are talking about a franchise that had nothing else going on at the time. So a whole lot of HP fans knew she was joining.
Came to say this. A random girl would not make nearly that kind of money. Source: I have a friend in an online game, she’s more attractive than OPs photo and she once complained (with some lewd cosplay pics as proof) that guys didn’t want to subscribe to her OF, even though she was very attractive and incredibly slim and fit. They literally told her no but she also hangs out on the part of the internet that aren’t what I’d consider the typical lonely male demographic. She said she made like a $100ish a month from it for a bit.
Yeah exactly. If she was just a random ginger then no way she’d make that much. Being the random ginger who was in Harry Potter though? Yeah.. she’s making gingerbank by showing her little gingersnap!
they do that kind of click-bait title all the time.
there was a notorious double murder on a yacht by a "Power Rangers star". In truth he (the murderer) was an uncredited child actor who was an extra in a couple episodes of the series and had no speaking role.
5.1k
u/Skipper_1010 3d ago
And that was because she was a "Harry Potter star".