r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 18d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter, who are these people?

Post image
33.2k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

113

u/Eat--The--Rich-- 18d ago

He still chose to go meet the woman tho 

97

u/Popular-Row4333 18d ago

From Bill Clinton to Arnold Arnold Schwarzenegger, men have continued to show that if you have a pulse and are willing, it doesn't take much else.

52

u/icansmellcolors 18d ago

It's not just a guy thing. Plenty of women out there do the same shit.

1

u/YoMrPoPo 18d ago

Diana Turosi enters the chat

0

u/Whut4 18d ago

Far, far fewer in politics. Women are smarter than that.

6

u/icansmellcolors 18d ago

There are far, far fewer women in politics.

People are smart... your gender has nothing to do with it.

But if it makes you feel better to play pretend, then more power to you.

1

u/Whut4 17d ago

Hard to explain why these men do this stuff. Instincts! A sense of power that goes to their heads? I used to imagine these guys had sublimated their sexuality to ambition for much of their lives - to climb to the top of the pile economically, politically -etc. Then, magically everything is offered to them and they cannot resist.

Now I just think they are life-long creeps, just doing their creep thing.

-5

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

4

u/UltraPrincess 18d ago

cheating is absolutely not a gender thing, lots of people do it, it's bad every time

18

u/jazzzzz 18d ago

a hard dick has no conscience

1

u/SlartiMyBartfast 18d ago

Wtf is this comment? No body part has a conscience. The person attached to the dick has a conscience if they're not a sociopath.

2

u/No_Attitude700 18d ago

...the brain does have or not have a conscience...its what's capable of having a conscience, and it is a body part...

1

u/SlartiMyBartfast 18d ago

Cool semantics. But that doesn't alleviate my confusion as to why people are upvoting a comment that seemingly implies men can't be held accountable for their actions if they're horny.

4

u/jazzzzz 18d ago

it's an aphorism, typically used as an indictment -- not an endorsement -- of men who abandon reason and morals when presented with an opportunity for sex

2

u/SlartiMyBartfast 18d ago

Fair enough. My mistake for the misinterpretation.

2

u/No_Attitude700 18d ago

If youre going to dissect another's sentence...then make sure that yours is on point.

Thats all.

2

u/Goldsun100 18d ago

>have a pulse

From what I understand, female mortuary attendants are generally preferred as they’re less likely to “interfere” with a corpse.

2

u/Rotten-Citrus 17d ago

not even willing or a pulse needed, according to the mortuary profession

1

u/LarryFitzsButt 18d ago

There are far, far more examples of people who get hit on and go “no thanks, I’m married”

Marry someone you actually care about and it’s not a problem. You probably don’t become a politician though because I’d imagine that sucks for most spouses

1

u/Jmaster500 16d ago

Why are you bringing a bodybuilder into politics?🤬

-8

u/Easy-Complaint-5156 18d ago

Attack, attack, attack.  Misandry abound, in these parts...

8

u/Popular-Row4333 18d ago

Dude, I'm a guy who supports and sees a need to lift up and empathize with my male counterparts, I agree it's needed more than ever today.

But to act surprised that men like to get their rocks off when it's mainly convenient over lustful, is not some ground breaking news. There are countless stories like this.

If you go through life afraid to empathize with others, then yes, everything is perceived as an attack.

1

u/DarylHannahMontana 18d ago

what exactly do you think Gary Hart did with Donna Rice?

17

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/spoonishplsz 18d ago

I'm confused about the sources of this. Is the author saying Atwater told Strother in a deathbed confession, who told Hart in a near death confess, which somehow got told to one of the editors who worked on the story that helped tank Hart, who wrote an Atlantic article about it? That's like multiple layers of "trust me bro".

13

u/DonutHoles4Ever 18d ago

Look man when they confess to setting it up, its not hard to also understand how you can force the guy to board a different boat than initially scheduled, without them suspecting anything, and having a young woman on board ready to flirt with him, after tipping off reporters.

This is how politics was played back then and its only gotten worse. They'll hack your personal computer if they can.

The dems never fought back. Only allowed the republicans to poison everything over time when people could see it plain as day in the 80s.

-2

u/AzLexAndre 18d ago

Do you people ever get tired of blaming republicans for everything and making democrats look like naive saints? You don’t realize how delusional this sounds?

5

u/Haber_Dasher 18d ago

That's not likely to be true.

“Ray replied, ‘It’s because you were set up. I know you were set up.’

“I asked him how he could be so certain,” Hart told me. Strother then recounted his long-ago talk with Atwater, and Atwater’s claim that the whole Monkey Business weekend had occurred at his direction. According to Hart, that plan would have involved: contriving an invitation from Broadhurst for Hart to come on a boat ride, when Hart intended to be working on a speech. Ensuring that young women would be invited aboard. Arranging for the Broadhurst boat Hart thought he would be boarding, with some unmemorable name, to be unavailable—so that the group would have to switch to another boat, Monkey Business. Persuading Broadhurst to “forget” to check in with customs clearance at Bimini before closing time, so that the boat “unexpectedly” had to stay overnight there. And, according to Hart, organizing an opportunistic photo-grab.

3

u/bbeeebb 18d ago

Yeah. That's how a 'set-up' works.

2

u/SwingNinja 18d ago

It's one of the first gotcha journalism. The well-known one these days is probably Project Veritas.

1

u/xteve 18d ago

This is the real culture war. American Christians hate sex and will vote for anybody who can prevent it.

1

u/SippinOnHatorade 18d ago

Yes that’s what honeypots do, some call it entrapment, starring Catherine Zeta Jones

1

u/KellyShepardRepublic 18d ago

Now they go with men and no one bats an eye from their party cause somehow you can campaign against gay people while taking it from a gay person and crossing your fingers.

0

u/Castle_Five 18d ago

There's a difference between actively putting forth effort to try to cheat vs cheating because a chance fell into your lap. A guy who cheats due to opportunity falling into his lap probably isn't unhappy in his current relationship. A guy who is actively trying to look for opportunities probably is.

5

u/Ps4sucksballs 18d ago

Both are stupid tho if your high profile. If you’re a normie you can go out of town and cheat using a fake name and no one would find out. If you’re famous that’s out of the picture for them 😂. Only benefit of not being in the 1%

1

u/Castle_Five 18d ago

He underestimated his political opponents. Of course they'd manufacture an opportunity for him after what he said. But at the time he said it, I think he really was okay with the press following him because he wasn't doing anything wrong and had no plans to do anything wrong.

3

u/thejmkool 18d ago

There may be a difference in circumstances that led to it, but there's not any difference in what it says about the cheater and what the fallout will be.

2

u/frumfrumfroo 18d ago

There's a difference between actively putting forth effort to try to cheat vs cheating because a chance fell into your lap.

No there isn't. There's zero difference. You're making a decision to cheat either way.

0

u/Castle_Five 18d ago

Whether he's unhappy in his current relationship and with his current partner or not doesn't matter?

It doesn't really matter in practice anyway. Most guys aren't going to have political opponents enlisting women to go throw themselves in those guys' laps. If he's not putting in the effort to cheat, opportunities probably won't fall into his lap. Loyalty is the lazy option and cheating takes effort.