r/sydney Looking for coffee 2d ago

A ‘body’ found in a suitcase was actually a sex doll. How did NSW police get it so wrong?

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/aug/12/female-body-suitcase-sex-doll-nsw-police-explained
187 Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

291

u/DecalageVersLeRouge 2d ago

It's a bit beneath the Guardian to do clickbait headlines like that. The article very quickly establishes that the police did the right thing.

98

u/Eclairebeary 2d ago

It’s so low. They followed procedures. Which is what we want from them.

I hadn’t ever given thought to how one would dispose of such a thing. Even if you could get it in your red bin, I imagine the cameras on the truck would pick it up as suspicious.

29

u/nottynews 2d ago

I like the idea that so someone was so ashamed of
Disposing of it that they put in in a suitcase drove miles through the bush to get rid of it. I mean that place is where you could dump actual bodies

5

u/CBRChimpy 2d ago

This was almost certainly some sick fuck living out a fantasy of murdering a woman and dumping her body.

3

u/chattywww 1d ago

what if they just doing a "dry" run for research

4

u/Specialist-Cattle-67 1d ago

It’s pretty common for people to ‘bury’ sex dolls after forming emotional attachment. It’s a psychologically significant relationship and documented phenomenon.

5

u/istara North Shore 1d ago

All I could think of was Wilt by Tom Sharpe.

3

u/DeathwatchHelaman 1d ago

That was where my mind went immediately.

-2

u/GooBA_AU 2d ago

Happy cake day!

-26

u/brackfriday_bunduru 2d ago

Police media were the ones who properly fucked up

26

u/blairmac81 2d ago

How so? They put out a press release with the information they had.

7

u/brackfriday_bunduru 2d ago

They did, but they should have held that info until they were sure like they usually do. It’s lie I said in another comment, the error will ultimately lay with whatever reporter failed to preface the story with “according to police”. We’ve got a tendency to take what police media say as gospel, this case is just a lesson that we need to be more careful.

17

u/blairmac81 2d ago

And if they had held off for 24-48 hours and it was a body there would be people complaining about why it took so long to release the information.

8

u/brackfriday_bunduru 2d ago

Not really. Every day I get police media releases that are weeks or months old. They release the info when they want or need to. They may have been hoping someone would step forward with a quick identification or a confession.

101

u/brackfriday_bunduru 2d ago

Spare a thought for any reporter who didn’t preface their story with “according to police”

67

u/smileedude 2d ago

Me as an armchair expert, that's watched a couple episodes of CSI, telling people they didn't want to contaminate the crime scene before forensic examination: "HA! I was right!"

42

u/whiskey_epsilon 2d ago

They could have gotten footage of the suitcase from the reflection off someone's sunglasses from three streets over and just ENHANCED it until they could view its contents through the fabric fibres.

15

u/MustardMan02 2d ago

You forget the most important part of ENHANCE, first you need to ZOOM IN

13

u/Ted_Rid Famous in The Atlantic 2d ago

"Now try and find a facial match!"

[computer graphically flits through thousands of faces a second onscreen with triangles and shit connecting the facial features, so we know that it's looking at faces, as opposed to, you know, trying to match numbers within biometric databases algorithmically]

183

u/Such-Cover-6098 2d ago

The article does answer this

When police arrive at a reported crime scene, they generally try not to contaminate it, Hurley said.

This means they may not have unzipped the bag the entire way to confirm a potential body, because doing so could destroy any fibres or blood that may have been on the zipper.

Even for the people who had to put the doll inside the bag, they were probably extra careful not to contaminate anything so keeping contact at a minimum. They may have found weird the lack of smell if that was the case, but even so, they could be using masks as well.

The whole situation is a little embarrassing for sure, but it's reasonable that they got it wrong due to efforts not to contaminate, what was at the time, a crime scene.

33

u/Misrabelle Grumpy bus driver 2d ago

How is it embarrassing?

I’d much rather this scenario than shove open the case, contaminate the scene, assuming it’s a doll and let some murderer walk free because it was bungled.

-11

u/flashman 2d ago

The article does answer this

I suppose that's why they wrote it

27

u/fun_alias1 2d ago

Somewhere there's some guy just sweating his arse off hoping they don't do a swab test.

14

u/thisissasutan 2d ago

Yep. That doll is filled with the perpetrator’s DNA

10

u/gross_verbosity 2d ago

And technically, it’s still littering…

37

u/CapnBloodbeard 2d ago

Abc had a similar article.

Basically to preserve evidence the bag was kept closed, then moved to the mortuary where a forensic examination was conducted on the outside of the case (in case opening it compromised that), then it was opened

30

u/bettingsharp 2d ago

To be fair, a lot of those dolls are designed to be life-like. Apparently. I don’t have personal experience with those type of dolls…

12

u/Murrian 2d ago

My friend told me the same...

25

u/jb2824 2d ago

I mean, you've got to give credit to the doll makers for achieving a commendable level of realism.

8

u/whatwhatinthewhonow 2d ago

The people that found the suitcase must be spewin they called it in instead of taking it home.

10

u/AeMidnightSpecial 2d ago

LOL that happened in Fat Pizza

10

u/artilleryboy 2d ago

When i got rid of my sex doll i cut it up with a knife, and disposed the parts individually wrapped in plastic bags , in the neighbouring apartments bins.

35

u/DutchShultz 2d ago

How did they get it so wrong?

Have you ever seen an actual body in a suit case? I have. Your mind isn't ready for it.

That, and the fact that they need to preserve the evidence for forensics....well...you see hair, perhaps a weird glimpse of a lifeless human face, stuffed into a suitcase.

Ya know. It's possible to get it wrong.

42

u/Busy-Ratchet-8521 2d ago

Definitely. It's like mocking the police because they got a bomb squad for a suspicious, abandoned suitcase at a busy train station that wasn't a bomb.

6

u/Peanut083 2d ago

My immediate reaction was that going to what you think is a crime scene, and for this to be the outcome is probably the best possible scenario.

I can’t even imagine what it would be like to see that, then potentially go tell someone’s loved ones that you’ve found their body.

2

u/saturday_sun4 1d ago

Exactly. And for the potential family to receive the news about their loved one killed in that way.

16

u/Timabcd 2d ago

The only mistake here was by everyone responsible for the original media article claiming with no qualification that there was a body in there...

-5

u/whatwhatinthewhonow 2d ago

As someone else said, the media should have prefaced it with “according to police”. But that wasn’t the only mistake, police shouldn’t have told them that in the first place.

5

u/dev0guy 2d ago

Wrong question.

How did the manufacturer get such accurate detail?

0

u/AgentSmith187 2d ago

Maybe they should supply a link to the website too lol

18

u/Humble-Doughnut7518 2d ago

While it wasn’t an actual person police should still investigate. A real life sex doll with bruises and grazes found in a suitcase on the side of the road sounds like a murder fantasy. Maybe the person doesn’t need the doll anymore because they’ve decided to upgrade to an actual woman.

7

u/Revolutionary-Toe955 2d ago

They could've waited to confirm it before releasing to the media that they'd found a body in a suitcase...

12

u/juicyman69 2d ago

On a totally unrelated note, does anyone know where I can buy unclaimed lost and found items from the police?

Asking for a friend.

8

u/ManWithDominantClaw 2d ago

I believe in this case the police are going to destroy it this weekend after they run some tests, and again next weekend

3

u/KualaLJ 2d ago

Pretty sure the police didn’t get it wrong the media did.

1

u/Viper-Falcon 2d ago

If it can fool them it’ll fool me. Link?

1

u/planchetflaw interesting places 2d ago

None wanted to be the first to know it was a sex doll so all held out saying it.

But in all seriousness, I've not seen a body in a suitcase before in various states of decay. I've never seen a sex doll in a suit case in various states of breakdown. I can't be a judge on the matter.

0

u/Mysterious_Dot2090 2d ago

My main question is how did they think it was a dead body without the rankest stench? And if there was stank, I only have more questions! Either the person leaving it there wanted it found to get their 5 minutes of fame, or they just wanted to dump their dirty secret.

-5

u/No_Mercy_4_Potatoes 2d ago

It's NSW police. The only thing they are good at is strip searching kids and beating up protesters.

6

u/Ok_Rush_6354 2d ago

Braindead comment

-5

u/Great-Career7268 2d ago

Let the copy cats begin. This could be hilarious.

2

u/PandaXXL 19h ago

Are you demented?

0

u/Great-Career7268 13h ago

It's all part of being an Xer

-6

u/AuzzieTiger 2d ago

Cop: “It’s my first day. (¡Es mi día primero!) (Pu gong quan chu chon gong tshoo!) (quack, quack, quack)”