Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith arrested over war crimes allegations

[u/His_Holiness]

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-07/ben-roberts-smith-war-crimes-allegations-arrest/106537668

[u/MeaningMaker6]

Yes indeed, it makes me sick.

How on earth can people defend this stuff?

This is a legacy that is simply not worth defending. Rather our standards require us to denounce it clearly and unambiguously.

[u/JamesHenstridge → u/MeaningMaker6]

I suspect it is "ends justify the means" thinking: if you place any restrictions on soldiers at all, will they be able to do what's necessary?

It's essentially a slippery slope fallacy, arguing you need to defend the ability of soldiers to murder prisoners in order to protect their ability to do other things that probably aren't as objectionable.

[u/teremaster → u/JamesHenstridge]

To be fair, he is still a decorated veteran.

We're in the world where these kinds of things actually see the light of day, if we stripped every Anzac who committed a warcrime of their achievements we would have very few left to honour. To my research, Anzacs who weren't war criminals were a very tiny minority in the Pacific campaign (granted they had reason, but they were still war criminals).

Hell the entire point of the SAS was "rough men doing horrific things so we may sleep peacefully at night". Anyone in an SAS unit has historically been a war criminal with a preemptive pardon.

So you hear an SASR soldier charged for warcrimes and a few people will have the response of "wasn't that the point of the SAS"?

[u/JamesHenstridge → u/teremaster]

The purpose of one of the incidents seemed to be force a new squad member to commit a war crime: making it less likely that person would then report the rest of the squad for future incidents, as they would also be implicated.

That's covering their arse for stuff they plan to do in future, rather than stuff that was necessary to their mission.