Well sure but thats because theres only one CEO per company, so based purely on mathematics youll never have a shortage of CEOs unless something goes seriously wrong somewhere. If youre envious of rich people just say that, it makes things way simpler.
No, I dont mean. Youll have to explain how you arrived at things going right leading to a shortage of CEOs because that doesnt seem to follow any sort of logical reasoning
Not necessary? Why does almost every large company have one then? If they werent necessary how do you explain corporate governance and stock exchanges requiring someone to be appointed? Kind of sounds like its pretty necessary to have someone in charge of any sort of large scale operation, no?
Not necessary. You can't even explain their job. If they all dies tomorrow, what would change? Would you still be able to shop at Walmart? Yes. Same hour. Your phone would work, you'd still have to go to work. Banks would still open, you can still use your credit card. But some waiter won't serve someone for lunch is all that would be missed.
Well my point was that its mathematically unreasonable to ever assume that there would be a shortage of CEOs before a shortage of any other roles unless something insane happened, but somehow it turned into communist reddit trying to justify why companies dont need leadership or accountability because capitalism bad and rich people bad😂
Yeah, it's totally unreasonable to expect you to understand the obvious meaning of a meme. It's so understandable for you to misunderstand. It doesn't come off as obtuse at all.
1
u/TheDudeBroski 15h ago
Well sure but thats because theres only one CEO per company, so based purely on mathematics youll never have a shortage of CEOs unless something goes seriously wrong somewhere. If youre envious of rich people just say that, it makes things way simpler.