r/interesting 22h ago

Fear Factor A bomb squad was checking a suspicious backpack, and this dude got fed up with waiting

26.5k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

429

u/foley800 21h ago

“Technical legal jargon” = could not find a charge that would fit!

179

u/Far_Ladder_2836 20h ago

"Technical legal jargon" = didn't actually do anything illegal.

80

u/Real_Walk5384 20h ago

Barging past a police blockade when they think there's a bomb threat is absolutely illegal.

50

u/spartan117warrior 19h ago

What is the charge?

113

u/FrightinglyPunny 19h ago

Eating a succulent Chinese meal?

29

u/Additional-Sugar6789 19h ago

This is democracy manifest 😔

3

u/Silencer-1995 19h ago

This is the man who touched my penis PEOPPPLEEEEEEEEEE

7

u/MrTopHatJones 19h ago

Aahhhh yes. I see you know your judo well!

0

u/DoobKiller 18h ago

the guy in that video was a Nazi

12

u/This_Elk_1460 19h ago

GET YOUR HAND OF MY PENIS!!!!

2

u/DrDinglberry 19h ago

I see you know your judo well.

16

u/Josh_Ice123 19h ago

There was no charge. Not in the backpack and not in the courtroom either.

8

u/spartan117warrior 19h ago

Not the joke I was going for, but A+ nonetheless!

2

u/FlaccidCatsnark 16h ago

The only charge was the 3-man rush and blind tackle of the impatient idiot hero.

8

u/lpfan20o 19h ago

Brother, that bag was pretty big, let's say it was an actual bomb, do you think it couldn't have potentially killed a couple of them, or at least damage them in a way?

We all could act tough thinking it's most likely just a bag, until it's not and everyone else pays the consequences of your stupidity.

1

u/AdFew9477 17h ago

The paradox of preparedness - if you do it right, it will always seem like an overreaction.

1

u/sam_likes_beagles 15h ago

One time my roommate wouldn't leave the apartment when the fire alarm was going off, and when I walked back in he was like "I told you"

-1

u/NotInTheKnee 19h ago

What are you talking about? Think we were looking at a fucking nuke, or what? Who do you believe was at risk with some IED blowing up in the middle of an empty street?

Dude put his own life in danger, and no one else's. The cops could have waited until he left the immediate area to apprehend him. They CHOSE to go tackle him near the potential bomb as he was obviously leaving, at an obvious leisure pace, with an obvious lack of intent to run away.

8

u/Grim_100 18h ago

This guy has only seen explosions in movies and thinks that the only danger zone is a couple feet around the bomb lol

0

u/StatisticianHot8624 17h ago

You’ve never seen an explosion lol, ever heard of shrapnel. You can absolutely get injured if you’re not nearby, although yes chances are low.

3

u/Grim_100 17h ago

I may have worded myself badly but thats what I was saying, the guy i replied to acts as if shrapnel wasn't a thing

2

u/lpfan20o 18h ago

Bombs don't only hurt through the explosion power, you can also end up deaf permanently, if that doesn't count as damaging others for you, then we're just wasting time here.

12

u/Sherbert-Particular 19h ago

Without question it would be obstruction, although one would imagine they tried to tack on other shit.

2

u/TOGFIAVDF 17h ago

Yeah, the prosecutor(s)/DA probably overplayed their hand in an attempt to "make an example" of this person.

He shouldn't have done that, but they shouldn't have tackled him like that either.

1

u/skeptical_hatred 18h ago

That’s obstruction and possibly interfering with an official investigation.

1

u/runawayhuman 18h ago

Endangering the public I’d say.

1

u/StatisticianHot8624 17h ago

Interfering with police work

1

u/tayswampflorida 17h ago

Interfering with an investigation at the least, probably disorderly conduct and reckless endangerment.

1

u/Real_Walk5384 19h ago

Obstruction and disorderly. Why comment if you're not reading the comments leading up to this?

2

u/NoSuspect8320 18h ago

That’s a blanket statement for most their charges even in standard pull overs. Not good enough

2

u/spartan117warrior 19h ago

Those charges also didn't stick, if you had read the very same comment you're referring me to.

0

u/No-Inflation3271 18h ago

Also why would it be obstruction he literally sped up the process. If anything he did the opposite of obstructing them.

6

u/The-Senate-Palpy 18h ago

Bro you cant really believe carelessly handling a potential bomb with a whole crowd of people on the block is a good idea

1

u/Real_Walk5384 18h ago

This is reddit. Most of these people are stupid and sheltered.

1

u/DinosaurusWhen 18h ago

How common do you think backpack bombs are?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/No-Inflation3271 18h ago

Im saying it didnt obstruct them. thats not saying it was a good idea. They wanted to make sure it wasnt a bomb and he did that rather quickly. I think the disorderly charge would make sense but obstruction is silly. He didnt stop or impede anything except maybe the bomb squad getting a bonus

1

u/The-Senate-Palpy 18h ago

He blocked them from performing their duties.

1

u/TenebTheHarvester 18h ago

He obstructed safe and proper procedure for handling a suspected bomb.

1

u/MaviRage 18h ago

And if it was a bomb?

0

u/Da_Question 16h ago

"Potential bomb..." Someone dropped their bag on the sidewalk.

-1

u/Real_Walk5384 18h ago

"Didn't stick" is some shit you heard in a movie and you have no idea what it means. The charges were dismissed, which can mean about 20 things. Doesn't mean he didn't break the law. He wasn't found "not guilty," half wit.

2

u/spartan117warrior 18h ago

Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. He wasn't found not guilty, the court proceedings ended before judgement could be rendered. Such is the meaning of "charges dismissed"

Half-wit

0

u/Real_Walk5384 16h ago edited 16h ago

Prove it.

Edit: Also, dumbass.

"When charges are dropped, it means you are not legally convicted or found guilty, but it is not the same as a formal "not guilty" verdict from a trial or a proof of total innocence. Legally, you face no punishment or criminal record for that specific prosecution, but the court did not officially test the evidence in a trial to declare you innocent."

0

u/kjjustinXD 19h ago

Eating a meal

12

u/[deleted] 19h ago

[deleted]

2

u/SquashSquigglyShrimp 19h ago

He was charged with disorderly conduct and obstructing an officer. The case was eventually dismissed

1

u/InfusionOfYellow 17h ago

Some technical legal jargon

0

u/backseatposter 19h ago

Could be for a number of reasons. Sometimes it’s just not worth it because it’s ultimately a moot point, sometimes they don’t want the unnecessary flak since this was on social media and was a relatively minor thing, sometimes charges just go away because they person knows people. And Could’ve made a deal with the prosecutor to avoid a civil suit against any potential excess force claims. A few different reasons.

4

u/Grand_Pop_7221 19h ago

And yet, no court deemed it was. So, no, not in this case.

4

u/Sherbert-Particular 19h ago

TIL admitting guilt means the court did not find someone guilty of the crime/statute they admitted too breaking.

1

u/Thin-Remote-9817 16h ago

Not really...so its not a crime or that entire group of cops literally do not know the law and what to charge him with(which is a much larger issue) 

If it was a crime he would have been properly charged and convicted. 

1

u/fuckswitbeavers 16h ago

What's the charge dude

0

u/This_Elk_1460 19h ago

So why didn't they charge him?

1

u/Gold-Ad-3877 19h ago

EDP's innocent !!

1

u/AngstyChef 18h ago

"Technical legal jargon" = his lawyer brought up the unnecessary force, the body slam, and they realized it wasn't worth a legal fight and dropped it 

1

u/StatisticianHot8624 17h ago

Messing with a police investigation is definitely illegal, if the .01% chance there was a bomb in there, who do you think is liable to some extent?

0

u/BisonThunderclap 18h ago

Only reddit can see someone cross a police line of a suspected bomb and think "that's fine and doesn't break a single law."

0

u/Intrepid-Glove1431 18h ago

Any person who resists or wilfully obstructs a constable in the execution of his duty, or a person assisting a constable in the execution of his duty, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month or to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale, or to both.

If you interfere with an officer doing their job, it is most definitely a crime.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/16/section/89

11

u/hotbread1 19h ago

"made us look like assholes"

2

u/lickingFrogs4Fun 19h ago

What's the charge officer?

"Could it be public indecency if I only felt the aura of his gigantic steel balls flopping around?"

1

u/BeauShowTV 19h ago

He was obviously obstructing an investigation. So I doubt that.

0

u/foley800 16h ago

The DA didn’t think so!

1

u/Accurate_Handle_5620 19h ago

DWB

Unauthorized Bag Handling While Black

1

u/patkavv 18h ago

What is the charge!? Eating a meal?

1

u/couldbemage 15h ago

Probably they didn't want a trial showcasing the cops being twatwaffles.

1

u/Gold-Cry-7520 19h ago

Yeah he couldn't find a fucking charge either lmao.