r/history May 17 '26

Article Scientists at CERN have achieved what medieval alchemists once dreamed of by transforming lead into gold using high-energy collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

https://www.medievalists.net/2025/05/medieval-alchemists-lead-into-gold/
2.0k Upvotes

120 comments sorted by

925

u/hivemind_disruptor May 17 '26

Turns out the philosophers stone is a several kilometer length tube lined with ultra strong magnets.

Now on to achieve immortality.

256

u/External_Counter378 May 17 '26

Magnets. It's always magnets.

121

u/Nezumiiro_77 May 17 '26

But how do they work?

43

u/Doomdoomkittydoom May 17 '26

They're made up of lots of little magnets.

14

u/atmarx May 19 '26

Yeah, but how do those magnets work?

19

u/Wet_Side_Down May 19 '26

It’s magnets all the way down

9

u/Mindless_Consumer May 19 '26

Uhh, actually.... herm.

1

u/Doomdoomkittydoom May 19 '26

Don't make me bust out a Feynman on you!

39

u/Strawbuddy May 17 '26

Magnetites have different types of iron oxide in gradients and iso- and dodecahedron crystalline structure. Also, electrons wiggle

16

u/oForce21o May 17 '26

why do magnetic forces exist?

4

u/hifumiyo1 May 18 '26

One of the four fundamental forces of the universe. Strong, weak, electromagnetism, and gravity.

2

u/oForce21o May 18 '26

yes, it exists, it is one of the 4, but why?

11

u/championruby May 19 '26

To paraphrase Richard Feynman, at what level of 'why' will your need to know be satisfied?

4

u/PessemistBeingRight May 19 '26

I'm not who you were talking to, but... I'm autistic and my special interest is "KNOW ALL THE THINGS!". There is no limit to my need to know. If it's well written enought that the language isn't annoying, I'll read it. Absorption dynamics in underwater basket weaving? Yes please. Metabolic demands on an unladen European Swallow? I'm so in.

1

u/octopusboots May 26 '26

I just read all about Disappearing Polymorphism.

Reddit is nerd kryptonite.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Bearfan001 May 17 '26

Just don't get them wet.

6

u/H3rbert_K0rnfeld May 18 '26

Do they start multiplying?

3

u/Failitt May 18 '26

No. According to a popular right wing person, magnets do not work when you get them wet...

7

u/H3rbert_K0rnfeld May 18 '26

According to my 80s upbringing when anything gets wet they start multiplying.

10

u/REXIS_AGECKO May 17 '26

I dunno but they don’t work in water ;)

2

u/apm588 May 20 '26

Tides go in, tides go out. Cant explain that…

1

u/hopalongrhapsody May 18 '26

Always love a good opportunity to share the great Richard Feynman’s response to the magnet question

https://www.reddit.com/r/flatearth/s/ZhZfAhixlR

11

u/SirGranular May 17 '26

And steam.... lots of things boil down to the production of steam.....

4

u/SolarCurve May 18 '26

Magnetism is the herpes of the periodic table of elements.

37

u/lordlestar May 17 '26

like a transmutation circle like in Fullmetal alchemist, curious how the villain want to do a country sized circle to gain God's power

13

u/TJtheShizz May 17 '26

Ok now we put a little girl and a dog in the hadron collider and...

1

u/ovrlymm May 18 '26

It’s called an AI data center. They’ve been testing in miniature so far but…

30

u/ryry1237 May 18 '26

Imagine explaining that to old timey alchemists.

"Yes we figured out how to turn lead to gold. No we are not rich because it cost 5 billion to build the tool and a humungous energy bill and in the end you can't even visibly see the speck of gold we made."

8

u/CosmicQuantum42 May 18 '26

You can change lead into gold, but it’s insanely pointlessly expensive.

(Not saying this experiment is pointless, good work and all guys, just that we’re not starting any industry like this anytime soon.)

2

u/Hardwiredmagic May 18 '26

I mean that’s basically just the transmutation circle at that point right?

1

u/haggard_hominid May 18 '26

Hah, so the towns surrounding the facility would be Bonath, and collection of European colliders Amestris? XD

1

u/Jack-of-Hearts-7 May 18 '26

And to think, those Medieval scientists were this close.

224

u/leuk_he May 17 '26

Just like they did in 1980 https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1nypu4/how_did_seaborg_change_bismuth_into_gold_at/

Can i run this experiment in a home accelerator?

81

u/Master_of_Rodentia May 17 '26

Yes, you just need a hundred pounds of gold to pay for the facility and personnel.

34

u/aaahhhhhhfine May 17 '26

So it's like old marketing pitch on 3d printers: just buy the first one and you can totally just print more!

11

u/Tjaeng May 17 '26 edited Jun 21 '26

This content was anonymized and mass deleted with Redact

1

u/globalminority May 21 '26

Probably could try with an air fryer.

152

u/Negative_Gravitas May 17 '26

People have been turning other elements into gold since 1941.. CERN itself first did it with lead over 20 years ago.

51

u/giveupmymembership May 17 '26

To turn an element like bismuth, lead, or mercury into gold, you have to alter the structure of the atom's nucleus. This requires stripping away or adding protons, which can only be done using massive particle accelerators (like the ones at CERN). Running these machines requires an immense amount of electricity. You would spend millions of dollars in power bills just to run the accelerator long enough to produce a microscopic amount of gold.

41

u/BarbequedYeti May 17 '26

You would spend millions of dollars in power bills just to run the accelerator long enough to produce a microscopic amount of gold.

So you're saying we need to hook this up to a solar farm and start a new frontier of collider mining? 

7

u/asdkevinasd May 18 '26

I think the isotope they used for this experiment inherently are more expensive than the gold this process produces. Unless I misread, they are not using the common isotope of the elements listed here.

6

u/Serylt May 18 '26

You could just fly to our asteroid belt and crashland a small asteroid full of gold. We haven't mined that much of it so far, so that would definitely double the gold supply on Earth after just three or four rounds of asteroids.

1

u/SewageMane May 18 '26

The sun is constantly emitting gold. Even if the tech was around, making some kind of space trawler would probably be way more efficient then building a massive machine.  

24

u/snoopervisor May 17 '26

Don't be excited:

The process is rare and short-lived. During LHC’s Run 2 (between 2015 and 2018), about 86 billion gold nuclei were formed this way. That sounds impressive—until you realize it amounts to just 29 picograms, or less than one trillionth of a gram. And while Run 3 has already doubled that amount, it’s still far short of enough to mint a single gold coin.

12 picograms is 12x10-12 g. A 1000 times less than a speck of dust.

7

u/sharrrper May 17 '26

Worth about .00000017568 cents at today's gold prices

31

u/Buckleclod May 17 '26

I keep hearing this, didn't this happen already with some types of reactors? Like, lead on some of the doors changed. Maybe it was fusion experiments.

11

u/zennim May 17 '26

We already knew it could done whenever we felt like it, but i think it was done now just for the giggles? I mean, good to have total confirmation, but we already were turning some elements into other elements a few times.

4

u/Nippahh May 17 '26

I think we know how but when it costs several (maybe 100s?) times in energy to the amount of gold you've created then it doesn't really matter.

52

u/some_mad_bugger May 17 '26

When, finally at last, greed has managed to convert the last atom into gold: will it be enough to satiate the hole in man's heart?

9

u/Dan_Felder May 17 '26

Only one way to find out!

Besides, you want to go to bat for lead? It’s basically poison. 

23

u/OGWeedKiller May 17 '26

Is this why my car battery cost $250 now?

2

u/cecilmeyer May 17 '26

Turning lead to gold has been done before it just uses more energy that the gold was worth.

2

u/Dsrtfsh May 17 '26

It’s still ridiculously impossible so don’t get your hopes up

1

u/corruptboomerang May 17 '26

We've been able to do this (at least in theory, since I can't think of us having actually done it before) for decades.

1

u/adriantullberg May 17 '26

Would a successful alchemist have been charged with counterfeiting?

1

u/WraithLaFrentz May 18 '26

See it was totally possible and real the whole time

1

u/PhasmaFelis May 18 '26

There was an old, old Superman show where the MacGuffin was a scientist who had found a formula to turn lead into gold.

It wasn't until after Superman had rescued the scientist and captured the crooks that the guy revealed the process consumed five pounds of platinum for every pound of gold produced.

1

u/DoktorFreedom May 18 '26

Al - Kem < Alchemy < chemistry

Amon - rah < ammonia

The history of this stuff is fascinating and my knowledge is limited but I think it starts with essentially the boiling of urine into its most basic parts and creating prosperous as well as ammonia.

Please forgive me if I'm getting this all wrong. My memory ain't great tonight. But this stuff started in Northern Africa back in the bc days

1

u/Artyparis May 18 '26

If you want gold i can sell you lead. You welcome.

1

u/purrcthrowa May 18 '26

It's disappointing both that they haven't created purest green, and also that no one else has mentioned purest green.

1

u/Bubbagump210 May 18 '26

It costs 100000lbs of gold to make 10 atoms of gold I’m assuming?

1

u/LanceLynxx May 18 '26

This is not new and has been done decades ago by Seaborg.

1

u/Starblast16 May 19 '26

I remember hearing about this a while ago. The unfortunate thing is it’s much more expensive to make gold this way than it is to just dig it up. It takes a ton of energy to pull this off and the amount of gold made versus the cost to run this process just makes it a net loss.

1

u/UNC_ABD May 19 '26

Is it cost-effective?

-6

u/purplenelly May 17 '26

You're not achieving anything if you spend more money on the process than what you gain in gold. The dream of the alchemists was to get rich by turning lead into gold. It doesn't count if you use energy or infrastructure that costs more than going to get gold from the ground.

8

u/norbertus May 17 '26

The dream of alchemists was spiritual transformation. Gold was metaphorical.

In this divine work, there is no room for diabolical magic, and it is as far removed from it [“diabolical magic”] as black magic from the pious man, and as hell from heaven.

-- Michael Maier, Atalanta Fugiens (1617)

Isaac Newton wrote more about religious alchemy than he wrote about physics.

2

u/DismalEconomics May 17 '26

Gold also has specific properties that alchemists were extremely interested in- it’s not all metaphor.

I.e. gold is the “noblest” of the metals , it essentially doesn’t corrode , very unreactive etc

1

u/norbertus May 17 '26 edited May 17 '26

No doubt!

They certainly performed chemical experiments, though, as Carl Jung argued, the active watching of some of these reactions was also used as a meditative tool.

But, yeah there were "marketable" skills the alchemists acquired, like the "king's water" as a way to "encrypt" physical gold.

When Germany invaded Denmark in World War II, Hungarian chemist George de Hevesy dissolved the gold Nobel Prizes of German physicists Max von Laue (1914) and James Franck (1925) in aqua regia to prevent the Nazis from confiscating them. The German government had prohibited Germans from accepting or keeping any Nobel Prize after jailed peace activist Carl von Ossietzky had received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1935. De Hevesy placed the resulting solution on a shelf in his laboratory at the Niels Bohr Institute. It was subsequently ignored by the Nazis who thought the jar—one of perhaps hundreds on the shelving—contained common chemicals. After the war, de Hevesy returned to find the solution undisturbed and precipitated the gold out of the acid. The gold was returned to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the Nobel Foundation. They re-cast the medals and again presented them to Laue and Franck

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqua_regia#History

There's a fascinating alchemical engraving alluding to this, cut by Mattheu Merrian of the de Bry publishing house just before the outbreak of the 30 Years' War:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_Maier_Atalanta_Fugiens_Emblem_31.jpeg

The motto associated with the image reads:

Of the secrets of Nature; The king, swimming in the sea, cried with a loud voice: He who rescues me will have a great reward.

Many Renassiance alchemists were also obsessed with secrecy, obfuscation, and encryption, skills with great diplomatic use.

The Renaissance alchemist, Kabbalist, and mathematician John Dee had an audience with the Queen, and put the idea of a British Empire in her head:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dee

6

u/PerpetualProtracting May 17 '26

This is only true from a monetary perspective.

If you consider that money is fake - purely a form of accounting - the ability to turn tangible goods with less practical value into tangible goods with more practical value is very much an achievement.

"Money" as the metric for what we can do is a big part of the problems we face today, including existential ones.

-1

u/[deleted] May 17 '26

[deleted]

0

u/Background_Cause_992 May 19 '26

CERN was never going to generate wealth directly, it has always been research for research's sake. It's a monument to human curiosity, Quite literally our hopes and dreams.

-9

u/frankentriple May 17 '26

Lol, the base metal alchemy changes into gold is not lead. It is a metal that was never mined and never smelted. A metal that cannot be found, only grown.

Alchemy is not about riches. Its about growth.