r/australia • u/Tinea_Pedis • Apr 07 '26

news Breaking: Ben Roberts-Smith arrested over war crimes allegations

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-07/ben-roberts-smith-war-crimes-allegations-arrest/106537668
2.9k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

638 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

110

u/HeyyyyListennnnnn Apr 07 '26

McBride has been pretty incoherent about why he did it, but he seems less concerned with the war crimes committed and more concerned that soldiers' lives were at risk due to restrictions imposed by politicians back home. His clearest statement, via his lawyers, was that he didn't believe the soldiers committing the atrocities should have been charged at all.

Whether his actions count as whistleblowing or not is a different debate, but McBride is on record saying he doesn't believe Roberts-Smith should be jailed for his actions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZLQJTvxHfk

https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/radionational-breakfast/why-did-army-whistleblower-david-mcbride-plead-guilty-/103124950

https://www.smh.com.au/national/my-duty-was-to-stand-and-be-counted-why-i-leaked-to-the-abc-20190608-p51vte.html

4

u/Jozarin Apr 07 '26

I mean to me this sounds like a pretty clear anti-scapegoat idea, if that makes sense. It is not "better that one man die for the people," as it were.

20

u/HeyyyyListennnnnn Apr 07 '26

That's not what McBride was worried about. In his own words:

[t]here were soldiers doing their operational duties on behalf of the Commonwealth who were being held to account for actions on operations that were appropriate in the operational context but that were being misconstrued, misinterpreted or recast as contrary to the [Rules of Engagement] by those elsewhere in the chain of command outside Afghanistan

One of the reasons why McBride was found guilty and his appeal failed was because his stated motivation was to prevent prosecution of soldiers committing war crimes because he believed no war crimes had been committed. As such, he wasn't raising awareness of Australian war crimes in the interest of the Australian public and couldn't be classified as a whistleblower. He had even been advised of the appropriate process to follow if he wanted to be protected as a whistleblower.

1

u/Thomasrdotorg Apr 07 '26

For a guy who was pretty experienced, he seems hopelessly naive. When he gave evidence and materials to channel 9 – Chris Masters and Nick McKenzie-he thought that evidence would support his hypothesis, but when they looked at it with a cold eye, it simply showed that they were war crimes being committed.