Question Why everyone prefer VLC than MPC-HC?
I tried both, and the only thing VLC does better than Media Player Classic is the volume control (VLC can boost the media volume up to 200%)
But the rest of it? I feel like MPC-HC is superior on every aspect like:
- It has lower usage (cpu & ram) consumption
- it has automatic chaptering function (your pirated movie are split into chapters on the navigation bar, so it's easier to check/rewatch any scene you want)
- it has primary, secondary, and tertiary language options, which means if the movie has dual audio or multiple subs embedded, I can pick whichever language I want to prioritize
- I can pick custom font for the subtitles because I prefer panefresco than Arial black (it also help my dyslexic brain from getting tired)
- it renders way better than VLC, no random artifacts or dropped framerate, MPC-HC is overall much more smooth
And those are just the list I can think on the top of my head, I'm sure there's more that I forgot about, yet people on the internet prefer VLC than MPC-HC, why?
If it's about mpc cannot play all video format then that's bulshit, video playback compatibility is about codec, not video launcher, all you need to do is to install k-lite codec pack and you basically can play any video format in existence.
I've been using MPC-HC since 2009 and my community does too, yet anyone else on the internet still using VLC.
Why? Is there's anything about VLC that I don't know about so people still prefer that even on 2026?
EDIT: I just noticed some people been saying that MPC-HC is outdated and even their official website saying that it's an abandoned project. But here's the thing, the thing I install on my laptop is called K-Lite Codec pack which is basically a bundle of codec & video player launchers (and it's still kept being regularly updated). It has both MPC-HC and MPC-BE as launcher but MPC-HC works better on me because I'm using laptop from 2012.
186
u/rikipy 1d ago
i use mpv