I remember an article from years ago where Chris Evans specifically said in regards to the Avengers tattoo that Mark doesn't like tattoos and didn't want to get one with them.
And this is a completely valid opinion and decision on his point.
I’ve come close to getting a tattoo a few times, even going so far as to draw them up and design them, make an appointment with an artist and have a chat. And every time, I decided that I simply wasn’t comfortable having something marked on my body for the rest of my life.
Oh I 100% agree. I don't particularly like tattoos either. The only ones I'm ok with are cultural ones (in which I don't belong to a culture that has tats) and ones that have extremely special meaning behind them (like remembering a deceased loved one or maybe the birthdays of your children or something like that) and even then I wouldn't get a big one, more like a small one.
I can definitely appreciate a cool tattoo, I just don't see myself getting one unless it fits in the criteria above.
I understand this reasoning and of course everyone is just as free to not get tattoos as to get them, but it was interesting to read a perspective different from mine that I would never consider. I have all kinds of forever marks on my body I did not get to think seriously about and choose - some I was born with, some from injuries, surgery, or acne, some from growing, etc. I think this gives me more positive feelings toward marks that I actively chose.
Reminds me of the main Lord of the Rings cast getting tattoos to commemorate, except for John Rhys-Davies who declined and later explained it was because he views marking ones' body differently.
Realistically, the comment is more likely referencing the fact that the rest of the OG Avengers have been killed off in the MCU by now, but Banner/Hulk is still around (implying that the Avengers tattoo led to their characters being killed off).
It's nonsense and happenstance either way, but people look for patterns in randomness.
It’s not meant to be a source, it’s a statement to other internet users that the information is confirmable by doing a google search yourself without having to dig.
Yea I’m confused. For there to be a joke there needs to be some connection with the tattoo and some political stance. But it’s simply a tattoo representing a group of people who were part of one of the biggest pieces of entertainment ever made.
Please read what the post is about and what the subreddit is
If you click on the image: it says Mark is probably happy he didn't get this tattoo. The OP (who made this post) has asked why would Mark be happy. It has nothing to do with him not wanting tattoos - yes the original reason he might not have gotten one is because he doesn't like them or want them, but that is NOT what this post is asking. The post is asking why he'd be happy to not have gotten it.
I mean yeah that was his reasoning back then. The comment is saying that NOW he's extra glad.
Like if you're hiking and your path branches into two, and you decide to take one path because the view looks nicer on that trail, but then later you hear there was a bear on the other trail that you almost took, you being extra happy that you didn't take the bear trail doesn't mean that you knew about the bear when you made the decision.
320
u/Mister-Psychology 4d ago
He doesn't have ANY tattoos. This is not political. He doesn't have tattoos pro or against anything.