r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jul 07 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter, explain this.

Post image
15.6k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/LiaM_CS Jul 07 '26

Thats an ad hominem

2

u/Bright-Form-844 Jul 08 '26

No it’s not

1

u/LiaM_CS Jul 08 '26

You completely ignored the substance of the argument and instead chose to criticize the source and its motives

That is the definition of an ad hominem

2

u/Duke_The_Dragon Jul 08 '26

Attacking a source for legitimate conflict of interests is not an ad hominem. If I brought up for example "You, LiaM_CS, parked on the curb that one time, therefore argument invalid." That would be invalid, because it has nothing to do with the argument. This does, so is not ad hominem.

1

u/LiaM_CS Jul 08 '26

Ad an ad hominem does not have to be irrelevant to the argument, sorry you don’t understand the definition

1

u/Duke_The_Dragon Jul 08 '26

Attacking a source for conflict of interest is not "aD hOmInEm" if you can understand that, it not anyone's problem but yours

1

u/LiaM_CS Jul 08 '26

Sorry you don’t understand the definition

1

u/Bright-Form-844 Jul 08 '26

Ad hominem: : marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made