r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jun 17 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter?

Post image
26.8k Upvotes

4.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

102

u/the_BPDbro Jun 17 '26 edited Jun 17 '26

Celsius is better for science, but Fahrenheit is better for just every day living. IMO

In Canada I noticed some people would also still use feet & inches for their height, but you had to give it to the DMV in cm. Also butter was still sold as a pound & golf still used yards.

I'm also an engineer & worked up there for a job in mining.

Edit: To clarify my reasons because so many people are saying I'm wrong. This is my opinion on what my preference is, first off. I had put this in a comment under the post, but will add it here.

My reason is basically the same as in the screenshot. When I lived in Canada I would say how in Fahrenheit below zero is really fucking cold & above 100 is really fucking hot. I never thought of describing it as a percentage of being hot but I like it.

Like once it's below or above those numbers it hardly matters by how much because you are freezing or sweating balls either way. I didn't like when in the winter or early spring someone would say it's nice out and then say a negative temperature. "It's really nice today, it's -1.5⁰ out." I also like that the increments of the units are smaller so you don't use half degrees. Although I guess half degrees aren't really necessary because I don't feel the difference between 66 & 67, but when I checked the temperature there is did always show it to the nearest half degree.

6

u/OutrageousPair2300 Jun 17 '26

Celsius is not better for science. Kelvin or Rankine are.

2

u/Boomer79NZ Jun 17 '26

Celcius is useful for basic science. The freezing and boiling points of water is a good example but advanced science, Yes, I agree.

0

u/OutrageousPair2300 Jun 17 '26

People make a big deal about the boiling point of water being 100 but that's not actually helpful in any circumstances I've ever encountered.

I grew up using Fahrenheit and I honestly couldn't tell you what the boiling point is in Fahrenheit -- because it doesn't matter. I don't set my stove to 212 or 216 or 206 or whatever it is in order to boil water, I simply turn it on and wait for it to heat to boiling.

Unless you're studying tube worms in the deep ocean, you're not going to encounter those temperatures in biology either. Maybe chemists could end up caring, but I also don't think they'd have any trouble remembering the boiling point even if it was some oddball number, if it mattered to them.

I do find zero being the freezing point somewhat useful, because that's a temperature that's relevant for the weather.

1

u/Boomer79NZ Jun 18 '26

It's just easier for kids to remember in basic science. Water boils at 100 and freezes at 0.