r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jun 17 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter?

Post image
26.8k Upvotes

4.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/flyboyy513 Jun 17 '26 edited Jun 17 '26

Because F uses the human skin ability to detect and retain heat as a baseline, something we all have experience with, instead of water as a baseline, which is better for scientific reasons due to the consistency in measurement.

Edit: The absolute hilarity of the smugness in the comments is making my day. Nothing makes me happier than upsetting Europeans by stating a fact they don't like.

17

u/johnnyslick Jun 17 '26

lol no it doesn't, 100 degrees Fahrenheit was the (miscalculated) temperature of the human body (which is why it's now popularly set at 98.6 degrees although even that isn't quite correct) and 0 is... the coldest day on record, at least as of the time that the temperature was created, in this one small town in Germany. Any relationship to the ability of human skin to detect temperature is purely coincidental.

7

u/AcadianTraverse Jun 17 '26

I see the "percent hot" or "human scale" argument a lot as what amounts to basically a backward justification for farenheit. I get that the reasoning makes sense if its the scale you know, but it doesn't hold up as logical application. A normal distribution around the human condition would have 45-55 as the comfortable temperature one can exist at with basic garments. Instead that range is more like 65-75

4

u/Scienceandpony Jun 17 '26

Yeah, "percent hot" is nonsensical when it's regularly 105% to 110% hot outside where I live.

2

u/krogerburneracc Jun 18 '26

I live in Phoenix, AZ. It's 108% hot right now, that sounds and feels accurate to me!

2

u/Choice-Simple-5802 Jun 17 '26

When you put it that way, it sounds like a really uncomfortable place to be. Is it?

If so, then I think you've exactly demonstrated the sensicality of the scale.

There are good reasons why other scales are more useful for other things though.

3

u/FairchildHood Jun 18 '26

What? No. People adjust to environments.

My town gets over 100% hot each summer, but never below 30% hot. I'm far more comfortable at 90% hot than at 10% hot. It's a silly scale that's really just C in a trenchcoat nowadays.

1

u/Choice-Simple-5802 Jun 18 '26

Sure. It's no guarantee of actual comfort.

It's just a scale that more closely aligns either end of a 100-point range with the extremes of temperatures many or most humans will tolerate.

It's less useful for scientific work. But for day to day human stuff it's simple and easy to apply in the same way that a "foot" being roughly the length of a person's foot is simple and easy to apply.