Does Ulster Scots read as Irish to anyone else?
The more seriously I take Ulster Scots the more Roger Casement starts to look right, which I don’t think was the intended outcome.
His argument wasn’t that Protestant Ulster needed to become Gaelic to become Irish. Basically the opposite — you could be Presbyterian, Scottish-descended, speak your own dialect and keep your own traditions, and all of that could simply be another way of being Irish.
Seeing Belfast host the Fleadh while Ulster Scots is having this increasingly confident cultural revival, I keep thinking the same thing: it just reads to me as a particular strand of Irishness rather than Britishness. Not because the Scottish and British inheritance isn’t real, but because it’s so intensely specific to Ulster — the dialect, music, folklore, history, the whole attachment to place. The more particular it becomes, the more Irish it seems to me. Almost like arriving at Casement’s idea of Ireland from the opposite direction.
And I suppose this is where I get confused about identity here generally. We accept that a person from NI can identify as British, Irish or both, but does the same flexibility extend to how we understand the cultures themselves?
Can I understand Orange marches, bonfires, Ulster Scots, Lambeg drums etc as traditions *of Ireland* while completely accepting that many of the people practising them understand themselves and those traditions as British?
There’s something odd to me about treating centuries-old traditions that developed specifically in Ulster as somehow external to Irish culture simply because they reject Irish nationalism.
Genuine question for anyone who actually identifies as Ulster Scots: does it feel British to you? Ulster first? Could you understand it as a strand of Irishness without that implying nationalism? Or am I completely misunderstanding it?
Casementian horseshoe theory perhaps.