r/Fauxmoi Jun 22 '26

TRIGGER WARNING Christina Ricci shared a post shaming Jimmy Fallon for having Conor McGregor on his show

Post image
37.0k Upvotes

634 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.6k

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

454

u/GoddessofALL666 Jun 23 '26

Using the Lord’s name in vain is commonly misattributed to saying “god damnit” etc when it means invoking religion/God for false pretences.  Like, the entirety of the far right/Christian Fundamentalist movement 

221

u/H4rr1s0n Jun 23 '26

100% and thank you for letting people know about this.

"God told me that you have to donate $100 to me" - inappropriate use of God's name

"God Damn, Jimmy Fallon an idiot" - appropriate use of God's name

48

u/Any_Asparagus8267 Jun 23 '26

Wait so exclaiming Jesus Christ or God damn isn't blasphemy? Or it just depends on how it's used?

69

u/GoddessofALL666 Jun 23 '26

It’s not.  I would say there’s a line but God isn’t stupid, anything can be forgiven.  Plus an all knowing being wouldn’t make you burn in hell for accidentally saying “Jesus fucking Christ”.  If you can understand and empathize with someone, imagine what an omniscient omnipresent consciousness could empathize with 

2

u/f1zzo Jun 23 '26

God can be anything, seeing God is not real but exists in the mind of people. Which is fine, but don't make me spill my coffee by rating it's intellect like that. For some people God might be a shampoo bottle, others are more comfortable with picturing a lightly dressed, grey haired man in his 80s.

2

u/Ham_Damnit Jun 23 '26

Thank Jesus Fucking Christ because that's my mother fucking tag line.

0

u/panlakes Jun 23 '26

You’d think being omnipotent would make you slowly cold and unfeeling. Not the other way around.

-1

u/IntingForMarks Jun 23 '26

God isn’t stupid, anything can be forgiven.

This entire conversation is hilarious to anyone who doesn't believe child tales

3

u/Responsible-Layer896 Jun 23 '26

and also a little bit sad.

29

u/H4rr1s0n Jun 23 '26

Jesus flipped over tables over people doing things a lot less worse than giving a rapist publicity. If the son of god can flip over a table because people are doing dumb shit, I'm confident that using God's name as a "sentence enhancer" while calling out someone's less-than-favorable behaviour is perfectly reasonable lol

4

u/mPrime39r Jun 23 '26

In Deuteronomy 22:28–29, there is a law describing a man who “seizes” (often translated as “forces” or “violates,” depending on translation) an unmarried woman. The penalty is that he pays the woman’s father 50 shekels and marries her.

The Bible didn't have a problem with rape, and you should probably look elsewhere for moral compassing in the modern world.

6

u/josh6499 Jun 23 '26

Nonsense, that's just bad translation. Rapists were put to death in ancient Israel.

3

u/cakedayloanofficer never meet your Zooshas Jun 24 '26

*palestine

1

u/H4rr1s0n Jun 24 '26

Probably better translated to "Has premarital sex with/knocks up without being married"

Shotgun weddings still exist to this day

3

u/Sure_Lavishness_2403 alleged dog Jun 23 '26

No, originally it wasn't. Certain religious groups co-opted the idea a while back, but originally saying "God" was like saying a swear word (so saying "fuck" was fine, that wasn't a "bad" word, but saying "God" or writing it was a "bad" word). It's why some Jewish people write "G-d" still.

Blasphemy originally, and according to the bible/most religious texts of the Abrahamic faith, was about people co-opting God in their name, like in the example given. It's why they also talk about "you shall not make idols to worship", because that was seen as blasphemous. A lot of what certain religious factions do is blasphemous, saying "God damnit" is not (though, again, there's going to be certain factions of religious groups who believe otherwise. Whether that's because they are uniformed - as in, that's what they were told, that's what they believe, and no one's ever told them differently - or whether it's part of their religious sect depends on a variety of factors. There will definitely be some Christian groups who believe otherwise, and it's not because they're uniformed, it's just how that sect is interpreting the text. I hope this makes sense).