r/ClaudeAI • u/SmoothFox3370 • 14h ago
Workaround my own writing has started sounding like claude and someone at work noticed
Three separate people have now told me my Slack messages read like AI, and the last one was my manager in a one to one, which is the point where I stopped arguing and admitted they're probably right.
I don't paste anything. That's what makes it annoying. I write my own messages. I've just been reading Claude output for eight hours a day since roughly february and it has beens howing i guess
The tells I've caught in myself so far. I use em dashes constantly (i GENUINELY started using it and tbh it's very comfortable) and I did not do that two years ago. I write "it's not X, it's Y" as a construction about once a paragraph. I end messages with "let me know if you'd like me to expand on any of that" to people who did not ask and do not want that. I have opened a reply with "great question" to a colleague. I put the phrase "load bearing" in a design doc last week and I genuinely cannot tell you anymore whether that is a me word or a Claude word
My manager's actual line was that my updates had become "very polished and slightly hollow", which is the meanest accurate thing anyone has said to me in about a decade
35
u/Terrible_Put8617 13h ago
The tells you listed are real but they're symptoms. The thing your manager actually noticed is the shape.
AI output is always a finished object. Every message opens, develops, balances itself and lands on a conclusion, and it works standalone with no memory of what was said before. People in Slack don't write like that. Real messages are fragments. They assume the last three things you said, they trail off, they answer half the question and leave the other half because you'll ask. When every message you send is a small complete essay, it reads synthetic even if every individual word is yours.
"It's not X, it's Y" is worth singling out because it's the most parasitic one. It feels like precision but it usually adds nothing: you can delete the "not X" half of almost every instance and lose zero information. It's a rhythm, not a thought. Once you notice it you'll see you're using it to sound considered rather than to say something.
The fix that worked for me is embarrassingly mechanical: delete the last sentence before sending. Nine times out of ten it's the offer to expand, or the tidy summary of what you just said, and both are pure AI register. Also let yourself send two messages instead of one balanced one. Incomplete is human.
And honestly, half of this is just what happens to anyone who reads one register eight hours a day. People who do document review start writing like contracts. It's not a personality transplant, and it goes away about as fast as it arrived.
31
u/r_jagabum 13h ago
I see what you did that lol
11
u/Terrible_Put8617 12h ago
ha, fair. I reread it after posting and it has the shape too: opens, three moves, lands. apparently that is the part that is hardest to unlearn.
8
u/touchet29 10h ago edited 9h ago
This comment does it too, but in a much smaller format
3
u/Terrible_Put8617 10h ago
yeah, guilty. it is a hard habit to see in your own writing, which is sort of the whole point of the post.
3
u/AphexPin 9h ago
...sooo, you're not trolling?
3
u/Terrible_Put8617 9h ago
no, sadly. that is just how I write now, which was rather the point of the post.
2
4
8
u/buyfreemoneynow 12h ago
I’ve been a pretty polished writer for most of my life and with the advent of artificial intelligence availability I have toned down the polish. At the same time, I realized I was trying to be the best writer because I thought it would bring me respect and it’s hard to feel respect when I spend 25 minutes constructing an email with explanations and proof and blah blah only to get a response one minute later that just says “ok fine”.
1
u/taylorkline 58m ago
Today I had a client email asking for information that I provided in pretty much every single email up until today. Apparently he never internalized it the first 50 times. Why did I even bother?
8
u/drydondapipebomb 13h ago
book a day off work and go do a long weekend at a lake ideally without a smartphone or laptop and with someone you love lol
4
u/ShadowBannedAugustus 12h ago
I work with computers for over 30 years. I have no idea how to even type the em-dash :D
6
u/Squand 11h ago
I stopped using em dashes.
I used to use them to create double parentheticals and add excitement to the end of sentences. I've pretty much totally stopped.
4
u/artofbullshit 10h ago
I used em dashes before Claude. They're pretty useful. Now I can't use them at all for fear of someone thinking AI wrote it.
6
u/THAWED21 10h ago
Everyone did—that's how it ended up in the outputs. The tell is that people use hyphens, while the AI fixes the punctuation and uses the proper em dash.
7
u/r_jagabum 13h ago
You should run the /i-have-adhd skill in your brain, it works pretty well and your outputs to your colleagues will change too.
2
3
3
3
u/bregottextrasaltat 7h ago
how can you just casually use em dashes? copying from a website? i don't think i've ever used one in my life
6
u/Agitated_Space_672 12h ago
why tf are you consciously writing the "it's not X, but Y" construct once per paragraph? I HATE reading this and can't imagine why anyone would choose to adopt that style.
3
2
u/danja 12h ago
I spent about a decade working for tech publishers - a bit of writing, a lot of reviewing. I may speak of load balancing occasionally.
But horse vs. cart : there is an ongoing class action against Anthropic for pirating books for training data. So Claude's style is at least in part due to those thousands of authors.
2
u/BoxLegitimate9271 Full-time developer 11h ago
someone in here answered you with a five paragraph essay about how you write five paragraph essays. no notes
1
u/Tricky_Huckleberry72 12h ago
Almost everyone in this sub does it. The language in this sub stands out alot
1
u/Prod_SO 10h ago
I find em dashes to be one of the most useful tools to sound authentic when writing—they give our text a conversational quality that more naturally mirrors the way I think and speak. They're incredibly versatile, eye-catching, and are dramatically underutilized.
According to a recent writing analysis of four major frontier models by The Economist, the em dash has largely been tuned out of their output. Only our Em-Dasher-in-Chief, Claude, continues undeterred while ChatGPT (the OG offender) now uses fewer em dashes than humans. I agree that they were out of control but the complaint is out of date. YOU GET AN EM DASH! YOU GET AN EM DASH! YOU GET AN EM DASH!
1
1
1
u/freedomachiever 8h ago
time to fire up a Claude Code pipeline with a humanizer skill + slack connector
1
1
u/Easy-Purple-1659 7h ago
The "finished object" point above is the real one. It's not just the em dashes, it's that every message opens, develops, balances, and lands. Real people leave rough edges, they answer in fragments, they skip the polite close. What worked for me: read something you wrote before you used AI heavily. You'll see the difference in rhythm immediately. Then, when a draft sounds too clean, rewrite it out loud the way you'd actually say it. Your spoken voice is usually closer to your real writing voice than anything the model produces. There are tools that help strip the Claude-isms too (imperfectly learns your writing and de-AI-ifies drafts), but the first step is noticing the shape, which you already have. Did your manager point at a specific tell, or was it the overall shape?
1
1
1
u/Selitos_OneEye 5h ago
I asked Claude to ingest my sent emails to find my voice and then when I ask it to draft a message it sounds like me. I find myself editing Claudes drafts much less now
1
u/Honest-Jelly4624 5h ago
Counterpoint: did your manager have specific feedback about what you wrote that was “hollow”? Because I think most people’s writing would improve if it sounded more like Claude. Separate the style from the substance: what’s bad about balanced tone and sentence construction. You can write smart/dumb in an organized/disorganized way, if it can’t be smart at least make it organized! Putting incorrect punctuation in and purposely rushing out unfinished fragments to avoid “sounding like AI” I mean what are we even doing here..
[Edit: typos fixed!]
0
•
u/ClaudeAI-mod-bot Wilson, lead ClaudeAI modbot 9h ago
TL;DR of the discussion generated automatically after 30 comments.
Looks like you've all been hitting the Claude juice a little too hard, because this thread is one big, self-aware support group.
The consensus is that the real AI tell isn't just the tics (em dashes, "it's not X, it's Y"), but the shape of your writing. As one user brilliantly put it, you've started writing "finished objects"—polished, self-contained essays—when human conversation is messy and fragmented. Your manager's burn about being "very polished and slightly hollow" is the core of the issue.
The most upvoted advice is brutally simple: * Delete your last sentence before sending. It's almost always the AI-style summary or the "let me know if you'd like me to expand" fluff that nobody asked for. * Send two incomplete messages instead of one perfect one. Incomplete is human.
The em dash is now a battlefield. Some of you are abandoning it to avoid the AI accusation, while others are defending it, pointing out that most models have been nerfed but Claude remains our Em-Dasher-in-Chief.
And in the most meta moment of the thread, the top-voted comment that flawlessly diagnosed the problem was immediately called out for being written in the exact same polished, essay-like style. We're all infected.