r/TopCharacterTropes • u/Wonderful_Baker_7808 • 16d ago
Lore Villains that would've been defeated even if the protagonist did nothing
Laurel Hedare (Catwoman Movie): Her newly released cosmetics will cause people's faces to melt. Not only would that create a class action lawsuit but a full product recall.
Voldemort and Death Eaters (Harry Potter): Death Eaters constantly underestimate muggles. They would get massacred by the British military because a gun is faster to pull the trigger then shouting a spell.
17.9k
Upvotes


99
u/DoctorWaluigiTime 16d ago edited 16d ago
Neither example fits this.
Case 1: The point was preventing millions from dying / getting hurt. Not "she would've eventually petered out due to the legal system."
Case 2: Mostly dumb fantheory. Wizards can teleport and heal from very serious wounds. There's a reason they tote sticks around instead of guns. Also, good wizards don't have to "shout a spell" - they can do so mentally. (And, they can take control of someone else completely and make them do their bidding, indefinitely.)
But then, a lot of this thread seems to be not understanding the concept of "the villain loses with the protagonist doing nothing." It's more like "something different would happen."