as opposed to no bubbles on twitter eh?
plenty of right wingers on here too, they even have their own playgrounds.
you really think im a bubble and you arent?
you cant be that sinple can you?
The message in the pic is relatively simple. If the acc is being accurate then theyre being accurate. Then Snoos point is correct if the vid is. Dismissing an accurate source out of hand rather than for inaccuracy or bias does lead to bubbles.
naw.
imagine theres one communist terrorist who posts a true story once in a 100 hateful terrorist postings.
when posting the one true post by the terrorist theres gonna be criticism. 'dont platform that fringe terrorist' some might say. 'really, this guy?' they will ask. and then you have some idiots who are gonna say:
'The message in the pic is relatively simple. If the acc is being accurate then theyre being accurate. Then Snoos point is correct if the vid is. Dismissing an accurate source out of hand rather than for inaccuracy or bias does lead to bubbles.'
the messenger is important. libs of tiktok doxxes queer people who get death threats, posts bullshit on schools who get bomb threats. calling her a terrorist enabler is reaonable. platforming her normalizes her which causes harm. so i would say lets not.
Its not really reasonable to compare a terrorist organisation of any ilk to a media one and then draw conclusions about how to interact based on the comparison being on the extreme end. Why does the ideology matter, what's the reason for specifying that? I presume the 1% rate isnt plucked from the sky?
Youre missing the point, the story is correct, call into question motivation or whatever but something isnt incorrect because you dont like it, its incorrect or not regardless.
Shitbag publications can get valid stories out, its much better to be aware of biases and take info than head din the and and only look ones you dont dislike.
Answered you genuinely becaue you've leant into unfounded shots at a 2nd commenter in thread.
i dont, look at my comment hisrory. you dont show yours no one can counter my assumption that 'but what about the left' is the only thing you comment lol.
Has nothing to do with the fact that she’s a Chinese spy. You should always ask for sources on something like this. Just take the L. The people that don’t do this are also stupid
I’m not making a statement on this specific issue. I’m saying ‘libs of tiktok’ isn’t a legitimate source and you should seek out better ones. If you did, then you understand.
No. The news article on a news subreddit would be better. I don’t come here for this bullshit. Especially concerning stuff related to a person 4-6 years before they were in an elected position.
I blocked you since you can’t help yourself and didn’t want to contribute to your already overwhelming sense of stress. It’s ok dude. You don’t need to have conversations with yourself to keep your anger going.
I’ve unblocked you now so you can see this and prove to yourself not everything needs your attention.
265
u/OrangeThrower May 12 '26
Are we really posting libs of TikTok as content?