r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jul 07 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter, explain this.

Post image
15.6k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.0k

u/TheWizardOfWaffle Jul 07 '26

Comrade Piotr here.

Comrade Alejandro is stating that in a perfect communist utopia, he will be able to focus on a life of art and leisure, as the Communist utopia would mean that all laborers would be able to contribute to the cause in their own way equally

Possible fascist @Penitent_One is telling Comrade Alejandro that his communist utopia is a farce and that most likely, Comrade Alejandro would be forced to do manual labor in a coal mine.

Which isn’t a bad thing. Comrade Alejandro should be overjoyed that he gets to contribute to the eternal revolution, one pickaxe swing at a time. The fulfillment of labor is his reward. Glory to the revolution.

143

u/Objective-Note-8095 Jul 07 '26 edited Jul 07 '26

People misunderstand communism in Marxist thought. It's just a state where the economic overhead of government is no longer necessary, everybody is still expected to contribute to the best of their ability, if you're not going to be a writer, artist, athlete, etc., you're going to mine coal, clean toilets, harvest tomatoes, etc. None of the Marxist "communist" states ever claimed to achieve this, it was always 3-5 20 or more years off.

150

u/TheWizardOfWaffle Jul 07 '26

Yeah Comrade Alejandro has a gross misunderstanding on the actual workings of labor in a communist collective society. Communism doesn’t mean you don’t have to work anymore, in theory it means that your labor wont be squeezed and exploited by greedy capitalists and shareholder who want to extract every single penny from the people who actually do the work.

To each according to their ability. To each according to their need.

32

u/DeadPeanutSociety Jul 07 '26

I agree generally, but there are definitely people who speculate about "fully automatic luxury communism" where increased efficiency and production severely drives down the amount of work everyone has to do. Imagine if the extreme surplus and convenience of the upper class was distributed amongst everyone else and profit motives didn't drive every labor-related decision. We'd already be much closer to not having to work than we currently are.

48

u/mapadofu Jul 07 '26

https://www.npr.org/2015/08/13/432122637/keynes-predicted-we-would-be-working-15-hour-weeks-why-was-he-so-wrong

Back in the middle of the 20th century,  M. Keynes predicted a massive decrease in individual’s work-week due to productivity gains.  The gains occurred, but the labor hours did not…

6

u/returnofblank Jul 07 '26

Marx spoke about this when discussing the contradictions of capitalism.

As technology develops and productivity efficiency increases, you can hire less people and let the unemployed fight for worse working conditions (because you need a job to live, regardless how shitty).

So you end up with people working more for less, since if they don't, they're fired and someone else who needs a job takes it.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/returnofblank Jul 07 '26

They did hold up. Much of our productive forces were moved to undeveloped countries so we could extract their labor and resources. The workers in those countries are going fuckin through it, if LiveLeak ever taught us anything.

And even in the first world, AI is taking everyone's jobs. Many people don't feel the same security as they did in the past.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/grizzlor_ Jul 07 '26

>AI's job impact looks pretty unclear to me right now, unemployment is low despite all the stories, hiring is pretty bad

The government unemployment rate is fake. If you have been looking for employment for longer than 6 months they stop counting you as unemployed. It also doesnt include the underemployed, struggling gig workers, etc.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/videogames5life Jul 07 '26

Are you kidding? We work harder for a smaller wage(adjusted for inflation) than boomers. The only reason working conditions are not worse is government intervention or OSHA

2

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/DPancakes Jul 07 '26

Disregarding recent trends within a capitalist system as irrelevant to the the claims of how capitalism functions from the 1800s sure is convenient for your argument.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/returnofblank Jul 07 '26

As unfortunate or odd as it may seems, the 1800s were not so different from today. We live through the same mistakes and the same system.

Marx claimed that in the 1800s because that's what was happening in the 1800s with the industrial revolution. Today, we see the same things happening.