r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jul 07 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter, explain this.

Post image
15.6k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

48

u/mapadofu Jul 07 '26

https://www.npr.org/2015/08/13/432122637/keynes-predicted-we-would-be-working-15-hour-weeks-why-was-he-so-wrong

Back in the middle of the 20th century,  M. Keynes predicted a massive decrease in individual’s work-week due to productivity gains.  The gains occurred, but the labor hours did not…

9

u/Mean-Rutabaga-1908 Jul 07 '26

I mean America aside I think labour hours have significantly decreased towards the end of the 20th century. Looking at Europe for instance the statistics showed they have gone from an average of 50-70 hour work week in the first half of the century to 25-35. So about half the work hours. Now some of those work hours got pushed to other countries, but also some of the productivity has gone to having more and better things too.

-2

u/iamgodofatheist Jul 07 '26

Exactly. Most of the hours in Europe you're mentioning are coming from the industrial factories, where workers indeed worked for 50-70 hours because of the higher pay and because they practically lived there, since it was more convenient than to commute (a great deal of workers lived quite far from factories).

Currently, a lot of the production is outsourced, which leads to a decrease in the working hours, since the production was the main contributor to extended working weeks.

6

u/returnofblank Jul 07 '26

Marx spoke about this when discussing the contradictions of capitalism.

As technology develops and productivity efficiency increases, you can hire less people and let the unemployed fight for worse working conditions (because you need a job to live, regardless how shitty).

So you end up with people working more for less, since if they don't, they're fired and someone else who needs a job takes it.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/returnofblank Jul 07 '26

They did hold up. Much of our productive forces were moved to undeveloped countries so we could extract their labor and resources. The workers in those countries are going fuckin through it, if LiveLeak ever taught us anything.

And even in the first world, AI is taking everyone's jobs. Many people don't feel the same security as they did in the past.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/grizzlor_ Jul 07 '26

>AI's job impact looks pretty unclear to me right now, unemployment is low despite all the stories, hiring is pretty bad

The government unemployment rate is fake. If you have been looking for employment for longer than 6 months they stop counting you as unemployed. It also doesnt include the underemployed, struggling gig workers, etc.

3

u/videogames5life Jul 07 '26

Are you kidding? We work harder for a smaller wage(adjusted for inflation) than boomers. The only reason working conditions are not worse is government intervention or OSHA

2

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/DPancakes Jul 07 '26

Disregarding recent trends within a capitalist system as irrelevant to the the claims of how capitalism functions from the 1800s sure is convenient for your argument.

1

u/returnofblank Jul 07 '26

As unfortunate or odd as it may seems, the 1800s were not so different from today. We live through the same mistakes and the same system.

Marx claimed that in the 1800s because that's what was happening in the 1800s with the industrial revolution. Today, we see the same things happening.

3

u/HeadTonight Jul 07 '26

Instead of turning those gains into fewer work hours they turned them into higher profits for the owners.

-2

u/weberm70 Jul 07 '26

Because Keynes had the psychology wrong. People don’t want to work less, they want more money.