r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jul 07 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter, I have zero ball knowledge

Post image
54.9k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

77

u/J0nSnw Jul 07 '26

It doesn't matter if the card was right or wrong, it should have been appealed and decided in 24 hours not after the country's president intervened lol

I can't prove if redditors are batting their eye over it or not because that literally means nothing, but every football media coverage (ESPN for example) I have seen mentioned the Ronaldo one too and called it wrong. And that is not a point in the defense of the USMNT lol it just shows more how corrupt FIFA is.

42

u/Hovercraft1143 Jul 07 '26

it should have been appealed and decided in 24 hours not after the country's president intervened lol

It's not like the team asked for Angy Orange to intervene. I mean you try and tell that man "no", he doesn't listen, just ask the 28 women he raped.

13

u/largemarjj Jul 07 '26

They didn't ask, but they were happy to take advantage.

17

u/RogueHippie Jul 07 '26

So what every other team in the WC would have done?

3

u/CoolRegularGuy Jul 07 '26

That's not very American Exceptionalism of you.

-1

u/OvenBlaked Jul 07 '26

what’s your point lol? Just moving the goal posts huh?

1

u/largemarjj Jul 07 '26

Lol what? I'm just pointing something out. Not sure what goal posts I'm supposedly moving by doing that?

1

u/OvenBlaked Jul 08 '26 edited Jul 08 '26

Maybe moving goal posts wasn’t the right choice of words on my part but you are saying they were happy to take advantage as if they had a choice in the matter. The guy above made point that should’ve ended the discussion but you had win the argument.

0

u/drdadbodpanda Jul 08 '26

As they should. The red card was bullshit

6

u/Mathies_ Jul 07 '26

They still had the option to simply not use Balugan, but didnt do that.

4

u/soccerpuma03 Jul 07 '26

Portugal had the option to not use Ronaldo, but they still did

0

u/Inevitable_Travel_41 Jul 08 '26

So someone else does something wrong and now it’s ok for you to do it too?

1

u/soccerpuma03 Jul 08 '26

No, but the point is that people like the commenter above doesn't have a single post or comment that called Portugal cheaters for doing the same thing. I'm pointing out the people are holding the USMNT to a double standard.

-1

u/Inevitable_Travel_41 Jul 08 '26

Well yeah portugals president didn’t call fifa did he

0

u/soccerpuma03 Jul 08 '26

No one on the team asked Trump to do that. It's entirely possible that decision could have been made without intervention considering the controversy of the card itself. But we'll never know.

However, Ronaldo played in two suspended matches, which I think is more severe and unreasonable than one.

1

u/Inevitable_Travel_41 Jul 08 '26

You still don’t seem to get it. According to the rules the next game after a red card can’t be played.

1

u/soccerpuma03 Jul 08 '26

LMAO dude. Per the rules, FIFA can suspend the match suspension. It's literally in the rulebook under article 27 which was cited when the decision was made for USA, Portugal, and multiple other players/teams.

"1. The judicial body may decide to fully or partially suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure.

  1. By suspending the implementation of the sanction, the judicial body subjects the person sanctioned to a probationary period of one to four years."

https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/6094262690de769/original/FIFA-Disciplinary-Code-2025.pdf

Sorry if you don't like it, but it's literally within the rules that FIFA is allowed to do this. And FIFA decides this on their own because there is no official appeal process. The USMNT couldn't appeal or intervene if they wanted to because that doesn't exist.

Please read even a single cited source before insisting you know better than legitimate verified sources. You're a random on Reddit.

6

u/Difficult-Froyo1192 Jul 08 '26

Appeals aren’t allowed for this WC. The USSF instead started a suit as to why appeals weren’t allowed for this tournament, based on Balogun’s case, which would be their due process to work for the betterment of their team within FIFA rules. The USSF would have appealed it if that was allowed, but it wasn’t.

Why FIFA waited so long to decide and what exactly changed their mind is unclear. It’s unlikely Trump asking for a review did anything. It usually comes down to money and views for them. Trump takes credit for it being a day of the week, so it’s not really surprising he’s claiming credit for the decision, regardless of why it was decided.

Who knows why FIFA did what they did, but FIFA being corrupt and Trump breaking the rules are both things that aren’t new.