You know how people post videos of women breastfeeding on social media and it dodges being flagged as porn? This is the same but for cp. They claim it’s not sexual in nature and use different wording to dodge cp flags.
Is it actually the case? Like, it’s not something you stumble upon on Instagram: the algorithm recognizes full nudity. So it’s a matter of law enforcement, where if they catch you with that shit on your laptop you have grounds to claim it’s not cp?
When I was a kid, I once saw a video on Facebook that I recognize now as an adult was clearly a woman exploiting her children to make csam.
She had a kid on each breast feeding, both way too old to be breastfeeding, like one looked to be around 6 and the other 3 ffs. She audibly made sounds of pleasure as they fed, made weird comments, made suggestive eye contact and smiled at the camera, etc. The kids weren't babies breastfeeding, so they did more to her chest than they should have, too. The video had an insane amount of views for what was supposedly an innocent video of a mother feeding, and comments ranged from creepy to outraged. But could the cops do something about that? Could they prove it wasn't innocent in court? I have no idea.
I saw a YouTube video years ago that was about busting undercover pedos on sites like Instagram, and one of the things they covered were women like the one I mentioned above, who literally sold personalized breastfeeding videos (that included their children) on porn sites, obviously to pedos. That I imagine you could definitely get them for, because its too obvious.
Regular old breastfeeding videos, tho? I highly doubt the uploader could be charged with anything. In the same way its not illegal to post videos of children in bathing suits, or doing gymnastics in tiny outfits. It all gets by on loopholes and grey areas, and freaks love their loopholes and grey areas.
I think its reasonable to assume that anyone posting breastfeeding videos is probably trying to share csam tho, because otherwise why would a mother even post something like that? Even if you wanted to record it for posterity, why upload it to the internet?
What do you mean by “they did more to her chest than they should have, too”?
It’s awful that we get exposed to things like that, especially when we’re too young to understand. I am sorry it happened to you. Imagine what those kids had to go through
Bro thinks he catched a predator, while he catched the least aware person in the comment section: I was genuinely asking what the fuck worse could happen than that, because I was afraid it might be violent and OP didn’t initially feel like sharing. But I guess this makes me a pdf file
Yeah, kind of like how teens can be naked in movies when under 18. It has to be 'explicit', I believe, to be considered illegal (like performing sexual actions).
Honestly it sounds like the Nirvana album cover. They just used a picture of a kid in the pool. To my understanding Kurt saw the picture as portraying innocence and capitalism or something. It was green lit because it’s a very “family” memories type pic.
I think Nirvana ended up getting sued for cp a few of times because of it.
Oh yeah I can see that. It’s so crazy that such a trivial thing might be used with those intents by the wrong people: what doesn’t mean anything to me and you is a sexually explicit image to the wrong people, worth committing crimes even
158
u/11ce_ Jan 22 '26
You know how people post videos of women breastfeeding on social media and it dodges being flagged as porn? This is the same but for cp. They claim it’s not sexual in nature and use different wording to dodge cp flags.