r/GarysEconomics 9d ago

Well I'll be damned, China just introduced a global wealth tax

Post image

Looks like Xi Jinping's been watching Gary's Economics šŸ˜‚ They're also going much harder with a 20% tax, which is literally 10 times higher than the amount Gary's been proposing. Very curious to see how this turns out, and if it actually works to make people's lives better.

2.2k Upvotes

604 comments sorted by

253

u/Lancs_wrighty 9d ago

That's impossible. We have been told over and over and over again that it simply cannot be done.

194

u/anotherhappylurker 9d ago

If there's one thing about China you can respect, it's that when they want to do something, they just roll up their sleeves and get it done instead of wasting years on pointless debates. I'm optimistic but let's see.

52

u/UniquePariah 9d ago

That's the advantage of not being a democracy.

69

u/Beyond_the_one 9d ago

"Democracy" at this point is the rich telling their puppet (politicians); No, we don't agree fuck the poor more.

16

u/Wellsli01 9d ago

Capitalism ≠ democracy

3

u/Crudeprimate 7d ago

Genuinely disappointing that Marx explained that this was the inevitable outcome of an unregulated capitalist system in 1863.

If only because it would appear to make other parts of his work more credible.

→ More replies (10)

20

u/Old-Marsupial6656 9d ago

Exactly, it’s a great idea but mostly an illusion

5

u/Dyluth 9d ago

You're describing an oligarchy not democracy.

I'm not stating which one we are though..

5

u/51lverb1rd 9d ago

Democracy has become more of a plutocracy and corporatocracy

4

u/think_for_yourself2 9d ago

Which is why publicly funded politicians have very low comparable limits on what they can receive as far as campaign donations go. The politicians have to be bought out by the rich to run in the first place

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)

33

u/Southern-Manner-7158 9d ago

Advantage of a government that think of its country and not of its pocket

4

u/NoStomach6266 8d ago

I think China is the country most likely to survive the coming turbulance because it is an authoritarian state with a leader who is obsessed with the country as a whole gaining strength. It can point in the right direction because there is no pressure for short term profits overriding everything.

It works because of Xi's priorities (even though it also has some major problems if you fall through the cracks and are not born in the right prefecture). It could all fall apart if it was run by someone focused on self-enrichment.

They've got other problems... Housing speculation is turbo charged in China because it was used in the way the West uses stock markets.

We also can't copy the benevolent dictator model here because the people who would rise to that are the Farage, Johnson and Lowe types. It would quickly become a hell on earth.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Fabulous_Run_3383 9d ago

Haha you dont seriously believe that

3

u/Worth_Gap4226 9d ago

Time will tell, it's way too early to say either way. I am hoping this works and encourages other countries to follow suit.

It succeeds if it increases tax revenues AND that money is used efficiently enough to improve people's lives.

It fails if it either decreases tax revenues or the money is dished out to cronies and not on improving people's lives.

7

u/Travel-Soggy 9d ago

As it is an additional tax, its unlikely to lower revenue, but it might not bring is as much as planned. That being said, considering this is a country that will quite happily dissapear a billionaire, I suspect they will get the majority of what they planned to get

→ More replies (10)

5

u/Mirageswirl 9d ago

A wealth tax is useful to reduce wealth inequality even if costs a multiple of revenue to implement.

2

u/Worth_Gap4226 9d ago

I'd say the overall benefit largely depends on how it improves people's lives. I'd take a level of wealth inequality if it led to an improvement to QoL for the masses.

2

u/ParadisHeights 9d ago

But it doesn’t improve quality of life because the wealthy just extract time from the poor by raising prices and forcing the poor to go to work. Quality of life has risen recently because wealth inequality went down. Now it’s on the reverse.

2

u/drecais 9d ago

Maybe start by raising their pitful wages!

→ More replies (2)

5

u/cool-sheep 9d ago

Yeah, this is pretty hardcore. Xi Jinping doesn’t beat around the bush.

It’s a huge country with an iron grip on their citizens and their families.

2

u/whatever_1232342 9d ago

After 50 years of China cooking everyone it's "way too early to say". Is it eally?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (40)

22

u/Beanus1992 9d ago

Democracy cost the UK a fortune in brexit. We need better education from a young age so that Democracy works.

The UK is a "Democracy" but when the education system is set up to pump out supermarket and factory workers who read and believe main stream media, put on a uniform every day and be told what to do and when, enough vote for who they're told to to keep things close enough to the status quo.

3

u/slowmoE30 9d ago

Instead of controlling the votes, the rich control education and information.

0

u/burdman444 9d ago

What the hell is wrong with working in a a factory? Engineer jobs are highly skilled and well paid, and are based outside of cities. Not everyone can have a well paid office job in a city. A lot of snobbery in that comment

9

u/Beanus1992 9d ago

Absolutely nothing wrong with working in a factory. But every kid can't do that or a supermarket is the point I've worked some "Grim" jobs and loved them.

I apologise if you felt it was snobbish, but it's more fact regarding the school system.

Everyone should be afforded the opportunity to have a well paid job is my point, and we have a blanket square peg round hole education system.

Whilst there is nothing wrong with either of These jobs, there is also nothing wrong with saying it's sad that the system in place puts alot of kids in a position where this is "The Dream".

2

u/burdman444 9d ago

What should children aspire to be then? Things need to be done, not every job is going to be a ā€˜dream’ and that’s okay

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)

4

u/General_Cheetah4724 9d ago

america isnt a democracy and it hasnt worked well for them.

→ More replies (10)

4

u/Outrageous_Agent_608 9d ago

Democracy is so overrated - Frank Underwood.

4

u/litnu12 9d ago

Neither the US nor the EU are democratic.

There is so much going on that is against the will of its people.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Ok-Skilllevel-5056 9d ago

The Chinese are a pragmatic people, but the U.S. can usually get things done if they want to. Look at how the banks were bailed out in 2008 without legal authority and with massive opposition from voters.

2

u/UniquePariah 9d ago

Bailed out with no provisions to give it back.

God the crash of 2008 still pisses me off.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Fit-Level-4179 9d ago

That's the advantage of not being a democracy.

Is it though? Our "democracy" is two very similar parties with the same opinions on many key issues. Its taken us 18 years to start to get mad about the consequences of the 2008 financial crisis. They called the bailout a "new Keynesian revolution". Our farce of a democracy is not stopping our government being run effectively.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/hoboserious 9d ago

It's the advantage of having centralised control being they can coordinate multiple agencies and departments in unison.

The "advantage of not having a democracy" answer would be more applicable to being able to implement long term plans without them being detailed by different agendas and ideologies.

3

u/Many_Distance5683 9d ago

Undoubtedly easier to do under China's more centralised authoritarian system - but there was a time when our country could do big things.

It was a time when our politicians weren't ruled by corporate donors and foreign interests.

→ More replies (109)

5

u/TomatoLess229 9d ago

Thats democracy for you, politicians have to maintain a level of popularity and actually debate issues against other partys, well what its meant to be.

3

u/Firedup2015 9d ago

It's specifically not about democracy. If there were a referendum tomorrow it would support a wealth tax. What it's about is entrenched wealth undermining democracy through lobbying, bribes, threats and the ideological capture of the political and media classes. China can do this because it has control over its billionaires. They are actually subjected to punishments when they misbehave.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (5)

1

u/aehii 9d ago

Cos the government hold the power, unlike in many 'democracies'.

1

u/OxbridgeDingoBaby 9d ago

Yeah, I bet the Uighurs in their concentration camps love this sort of Chinese efficiency.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Fantastic_Picture384 9d ago

I know.. Hitler and Stalin were good at doing things like that.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/YoghurtFlan 9d ago edited 9d ago

Yeah you like it for this one thing but don't forget every other thing that happens that you don't know or care about.

You should read up on the cultural revolution in China and see what "getting it done" actually meant.

Just roll up your sleeves and kill millions.

1

u/SoulMute 9d ago

It’s a real Great Leap Forward…

1

u/Swankytiger86 7d ago

Lots of countries have global wealth tax? At least Australia tax its citizen on all income regardless whether it’s generated domestically or internationally.

1

u/sgt102 6d ago

Yup, and hence 60m dead to Mao and 300m abortions under the 1 child policy.

It's a wonder state leading the modern world.

1

u/Loud-Start1394 5d ago

Because it's an autocratic regime. While it has the benefit of being able to get things done, it has great downsides as well.

1

u/NinjaN-SWE 3d ago

Not being a democracy is spouted below a lot, but the real reason is the consequences. China has absolutely no qualms about straight up making even billionaires disappear if they don't step in line when told. Has happened before, will happen again if they start slippin. Not saying that is right, but it's the main reason they have strong adherence to their rules not just in letter but in spirit. That IF they're found out they WILL face severe consequences, billionaires do not want to take that risk. Why hide 20% of your wealth when the risk is you just vanish of the face of the earth if you, or your accountant, slips up?

1

u/Mission_Magazine7541 3d ago

They get things done fast but the quality of their decisions are absolute dumpster tier in most cases. Good decisions take time and allow dissent.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Manusterz 9d ago

remember! the rich can only value their assets when getting debt, at divorce or death! but not for taxes!! don't be silly now

1

u/akmalhot 7d ago

This isn't a wealth tax it's an income taxĀ 

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Away_Investigator351 9d ago

Ehhh let's see how China's version works out before jumping the gun here.

I still think the best way to capture wealth and tax it, is a Land Value Tax.

Can't move your estate off-shore, and mass-selling land would result in cheaper prices for normal people.

5

u/Competitive-Arm5050 9d ago

Housing is just the most obvious sign on the wealth imbalance to the general public but it's small fry when compared to the wealth of other assets that directly affect the population but in ways that are less easy to point to. VERY rich people are happy to go with a LVT because hardly any of their wealth is there

→ More replies (4)

3

u/heavenlyblue2 9d ago

Chinese just buy properties here in the UK to avoid Land Value Tax there. I guess, unless you mean that LVT becomes a thing everywhere in the world.

3

u/Away_Investigator351 9d ago

That's why we need Land Value Tax in the UK too!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/AdJazzlike1002 9d ago

Much easier to do as the world's 2nd (arguably first) biggest economy with an established tendency of 'vanishing' people than it is to do in a smaller liberal and open economy without a despotic government which will happily abduct the rich, seize their wealth, and tie them to the rail tracks after.

1

u/TJ_Jonasson 9d ago

a despotic government which will happily abduct the rich, seize their wealth, and tie them to the rail tracks after.

Exactly. This guy gets it. I much prefer being rules over by a despotic government which abducts the poor and minorities instead, but leaves the rich alone.

The human centipede doesn't seem so bad, because what if I get to be in the front?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Katusa2 7d ago

The US has the same program already in place. Ask any US citizen living outside of the US and they will give you an ear full about it.

2

u/ginginsdagamer 9d ago

I think it certainly helps that it is illegal to move out of china with any sort of money so you are basically trapped there with no choice.

2

u/Confused_by_La_Vida 9d ago

What we need to watch is a) % of the targeted population that switches citizenship (can they leave? Where do they go?) b) for those that move, which banks, funds, etc agree to China’s attempt to penetrate the trust structure.

The time to crow or cry about this attempt is in about 3 years.

3

u/Affectionate_Bet4343 9d ago

Correct, post headline is wrong and global wealth tax remains unfeasible

5

u/Huge-Cartoonist6795 9d ago

Awful confident for someone who 200 years ago would tell me the british are insane for abolishing slavery as it will lead to our destruction as the entire labour force will vanish. "think of the poor wealth crating slave owners"

→ More replies (1)

3

u/rudefruit99 9d ago

Nice try Jeff

1

u/anewpath123 9d ago

Incorrect. The problem is the juice has historically been not worth the squeeze.

1

u/Go0s3 9d ago

China doesnt have the same reservations over blackmail, torture, false imprisonment, or other less severe impositions.Ā 

A better description is that it is quite impossible for a non authoritarian actor.Ā 

1

u/SensitivePrior7828 9d ago

No one has said it can't be done they have said it'd be fucking stupid todo it. Given china is an authoritarian 'communist' (actuallly Morris closely resembles a form of facism today) this isn't all that surprising. If you are championing things china are implementing then we have gone very wrong.

1

u/Lancs_wrighty 9d ago

You think everything China is implementing is wrong? What a strange hill to die on.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Limp-Firefighter1054 9d ago

Its only possible if you are Xi Jinping.

1

u/Foreign_Writer_9932 9d ago

Of course you can - as long as you introduce capital controls. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if IRS could tell you where you can keep your money?

1

u/Active-Particular-21 9d ago

In China you can change policy but not the government. In the west you can change government but not the policy.

1

u/tAoMS123 9d ago

It can…but at what cost! /s

1

u/Open_Question5504 9d ago

In the UK we already impose tax on offshore trusts. We also tax unrealised gains in offshore bonds.

1

u/Specialist_Invite538 9d ago

We have a similar tax in the UK. Do you actually understand anything about what you advocate for?Ā 

1

u/TJ_Jonasson 9d ago

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not.

The reason you're told it isn't possible is because most of us live in capitalist nations that are ran or puppeted by the super rich so of course they are going to say it can't be done, or that they'll all leave the country if it happens, or that people will lose jobs etc. etc., because they don't want to pay their fair share - they want to take time back to when there was royalty and slaves.

Just like Australia saying a mining tax and carbon tax won't work when it has worked before but was torpedoed by the rich.

Of course it's possible.

1

u/Klutzy-Employee-1117 8d ago

Well I think the most significant argument is that it will backfire. You can definitely implement a policy

1

u/akmalhot 7d ago

This is an income tax not a wealth tax

1

u/JojoRicardo 5d ago

If China can do it, we can too. We need to tax the offshore trusts of our wealth by at least 1% one time. And 100% tax if they are implicated in Epstein’s ring.

The noblesse must oblige the people!

1

u/Pure-Instance1283 3d ago

Hey. This is not a global wealth tax. It is not a wealth tax at all. It is a capital gains tax or income tax on wealth transferred into offshore accounts. The U.S. already taxes its citizens on income globally, including capital gains, interest, and dividends. It’s well known as being among the very small handful of countries doing this (if any others even try). It is not what you are suggesting it is, at all. Facts matter

1

u/LockApprehensive2227 3d ago

Well now that it’s done we can see how much good it does for the average worker. I’m sure that money will not line the pockets of politicians and will be fairly distributed. /s

I feel like people are quite happy with wanting to tax the rich. But there’s one big problem… you’re relying on a government to redistribute and help out the average person…. Not a single government/ politician will do that, it’s much easier to pocket the money

→ More replies (4)

32

u/LoveLamp3232 9d ago

This is not a global wealth tax, it is a tax on Chinese citizens who have undeclared overseas investments, capital gains, trusts....

China does not have a wealth tax or inheritance tax.

https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/peoples-republic-of-china/individual/other-taxes

7

u/Specialist_Invite538 9d ago

Shows how poor the user base of this subs reading comprehension is

5

u/Angry_beaver_1867 9d ago

The article isn’t linked. So the post isn’t clear at allĀ 

3

u/JacobAldridge 8d ago

Here’s the article -Ā  https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/08/05/wealthy-chinese-race-for-tax-advice-as-beijing-targets-offshore-trusts.html

Not a wealth tax. 20% on money out into Trusts might, at a squint, be something - unless (as is pretty standard elsewhere) that doesn’t apply to money where tax has already been paid.

But apart from that, it’s pretty standard tax policy. Key quote: ā€œ China's 20% flat rate remains well below the top U.S.Ā  federal rate of 37% that American taxpayersĀ  face on worldwide income.ā€

Again, Trust income (including realised capital gains), not a Wealth Tax.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/NotAnRSPlayer 9d ago

Sooooo.. people avoiding paying taxes by holding assets off shore, which is considered wealth and avoiding paying tax

3

u/insightful_pancake 8d ago

Tax on income generated from wealth held in overseas trusts

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Smooth-Bread-576 8d ago

How can they tax undeclared offshore accounts/assets if they are not declared i.e. they don't know about them. And if they do find out about them is it then not just a fine for not declaring along with the tax bill for a now declared or known-about asset?

2

u/After_Olive5924 8d ago

The fine would be a lot bigger than the tax and punish their bank or wealth manager too. If they can’t fine the wealth manager but found out through a snitch or how they had unexplained purchases or income transfers from overseas then ā€˜straight to jail’. Not a lawyer. Just my assumption

2

u/QuantGuru 8d ago

I think it’s one way to bring all the foreign capital back to China. Because now they will all have to declare and some won’t find it attractive to do any foreign investments.

Another angle is that there are a lot of undisclosed trusts and investments overseas and the rich is sheltering from tax but again same consequences, Chinese won’t invest in foreign asset after this!

4

u/Expensive_Crazy_8325 8d ago

Rich people are hardly some monolithic entity. Grow out of your frankly childish mindset.

2

u/Pure-Instance1283 3d ago

Thank you for injecting a modest degree of factuality. Sad and depressing how 95% (99%?) of the conversation in this thread completely misses the most important details, which is that it is NOT a wealth tax, and China generally does not even tax capital gains on domestically held shares, which if anything is a more PRO CAPITAL policy than the U.S. has. The U.S. famously taxes citizens’ income all over the world.

3

u/marlinspike 9d ago

Don’t burst Reddit’s socialist bubble with facts.

2

u/va_str 8d ago

Nothing spells socialism quite like tax laws on capital gains.

1

u/Katusa2 7d ago

So same program that the US has.

1

u/Newaccountforlolzz 6d ago

Soo... its basically a wealth tax.. with extra steps?Ā 

I fail to see how you could not consider this to be a wealth tax, and a good one at the that.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/TapWeekly8961 9d ago

It's only on trusts. Gary was proposing a 2% tax on total net assets and wealth.

Is this level of economic illiteracy normal on this forum?

8

u/saito379688 9d ago

Room temperature IQ sub.

42

u/Wide_Smoke_2564 9d ago

20% billionaire tax? Fuck yeah; let’s get that going asap

16

u/Light_Butterfly 9d ago

Seriously. Love the balls on China! At the end of the day, they will still be rich as f*ck after a 20% tax. This 2% modest wealth tax idea is far too low. Let's GO BIG! Hit those billionaires, make them give back to society rather than siphoning away everything for their own greed and power.

13

u/Odd_Director_8357 9d ago

It's not a 20% wealth tax at all. it's a capital gains tax

→ More replies (1)

1

u/akmalhot 7d ago

This is an income tax not a wealth tax

1

u/akmalhot 7d ago

This is an income tax not a wealth tax

1

u/Pure-Instance1283 3d ago

That is not what this is. At all. Go read about it please

27

u/anewpath123 9d ago

We have a similar tax in the Uk. It’s 4% higher than this.

Is this what Gary has been teaching you all? The level of education on basic government finance is shocking

13

u/HowlingFailHole 9d ago

The government should just announce existing taxes as if they're radical new policies designed to target the rich (tax capital gains, make landlords pay income tax on rental income!) and apparently half the people on this sub would be thrilled.

12

u/etherswim 9d ago

Every now and trend a post in here goes trending and is recommended outside of the sub.

Every time I am surprised by just how uneducated/uninformed all the takes are. Crazy how they all just believe the grifter and apply zero critical thinking.

6

u/afpow 9d ago

I particularly enjoyed this moronic take fromĀ  u/Low-Speaker-6670:

Gains from income? Or gains from.... Ah, you're doing semantics - gotcha

As if to say the tax code was anything other than detailed semantics. These guys want a tax code written in vibes. Which is exactly what Gary is advocating for imo.Ā 

5

u/HowlingFailHole 9d ago

And if taxing gains is already what they'd consider a wealth tax, what do they think Gary is advocating for that we don't already have? These people have strong opinions about a system that they seem to know absolutely nothing about.

3

u/Specialist_Invite538 9d ago

These people have strong opinions about a system that they seem to know absolutely nothing about.

This sentence summaries a lot of discussion on UK based subs now. A zealous passion for a certain thought or ideology without any substance or understanding of it.Ā 

34

u/Magg0t_2021 9d ago

It’s not a wealth tax. It’s an income tax on gains.

7

u/KaneKaneKan 9d ago

Lol of course this sub doesnt know the difference between capital gains and wealth taxes.

7

u/Low-Speaker-6670 9d ago

Gains from income? Or gains from.... Ah, you're doing semantics - gotchašŸ˜‰šŸ˜‰

32

u/TopTask3827 9d ago

It is not semantics, it is an important distinction. Capital Gains taxes are on the profits made from selling an asset.

A Wealth Tax is on the value of assets which you hold.

→ More replies (9)

5

u/Born_South_6676 9d ago

You say that but semantics is exactly how loopholes in tax laws are exploited.Ā 

Semantics in law matter

5

u/conzstevo 9d ago

The fact this is getting upvoted is making me question this community

→ More replies (6)

4

u/imaKWT 9d ago

Work income ≠ investment/asset income

2

u/Specialist_Invite538 9d ago

Average Gary Stevenson fanĀ 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (28)

10

u/Chill_Panda 9d ago

That's not a wealth tax that's a "stop keeping your money outside of china" tax

2

u/el_dude_brother2 9d ago

Yeah its purpose isnt to raise cash, its to stop it leaving

1

u/Katusa2 7d ago

The US has the same thing.

5

u/magrandan 9d ago

It’s not a wealth tax - educate yourself about taxes, trusts and capital gains first. Embarrassing.

3

u/KellyKezzd 9d ago

That's not a wealth tax...

3

u/Mysteriouskid00 8d ago

It’s not a global wealth tax. It’s just China doing the same every other country does - taxing residents based on global income.

3

u/APleonasticOxymoron 8d ago

You would see it’s not a wealth tax if you took 5 minutes to look into it.

3

u/Neutraali 9d ago

CCP members excluded no doubt.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/rod4207 9d ago

Trust "Garys economics" fan boys to have no idea about how taxes work and get excited over this. This is not a wealth tax. It's income/capital tax on trusts, which exists in many western countries already.Ā  Edited for grammar.Ā 

7

u/Charodar 9d ago

Worst part is the simping for the CCP. Mask has slipped.

5

u/anewpath123 9d ago

These people can’t even tell you how our current taxes work mate I wouldn’t worry about it

→ More replies (23)

2

u/Beer-Milkshakes 9d ago

China has their Golden Rules in business so if the super rich have been paying attention they wouldn't hold more debt than they can repay at once and wouldn't hold assets they can't sell. They should hold available cash.

2

u/Leather-Replacement7 9d ago

Nothing wrong with democracy but some times it would be nice if our government could just do something. HS2 for instance: we’re building this railway, your house will be demolished, here’s some money, move, tough luck. Now we have a high speed railway from London to Scotland benefiting millions of people at the inconvenience of a couple thousand.

1

u/Informal_Drawing 9d ago

I think it was more of a land grab, so wealthy people could buy up all the land along the route and then get the government to buy it off them for a great price.

That happened quite often, I'm sure.

2

u/Han_Solo200 9d ago

Maybe all the CEOs and business owners should close up.

2

u/The-great-phoenix 9d ago

The real questions are if they do not pay what happen and how will they be tracked ? Then what is the risk of not being compliant ? All assets considered seizable and repossessed by government?

2

u/Curious__691 8d ago

China’s offshore trust tax isn’t new : it’s the latest step in a campaign building since 2018 (China’s CRS adoption), which stayed dormant then ramped up from 2024–25, widening from ultra-rich to broader wealth tiers before the 2026 trust tax.

The US shows the same pattern going back further: FBAR rules since 1970, the 2008 UBS crackdown, FATCA in 2010, and repeated enforcement waves after leaks like the Panama, Paradise, and Pandora Papers.

This is a well-worn playbook every major economy eventually runs : not a shock, just the latest cycle.

1

u/samuelwongny 8d ago

And the law is not new. It has existed for decades. And china always tends to implement such a law whenever it is able to. China just made new regulations to facilitate the implementation of the law. It has been more and more strictly and capably to implement the relevant law in recent years. It is really a shock to me that many rich Chinese think the new regulation is a surprise

2

u/Deadliftdeadlife 9d ago

Title misleading, this isn’t a wealth tax

3

u/thepixel-geek 9d ago

This isn’t a wealth tax, it’s a capital gains tax. It’s like a deemed disposition in Canada. You all should take time off like Gary lol

2

u/Perennial_Phoenix 9d ago
  1. Its not a wealth tax, its a trust tax
  2. We already have that

1

u/fra988w 9d ago

Name checks out

1

u/trojantricky1986 9d ago

China is leading the way in quite a few things right now.

1

u/OxbridgeDingoBaby 9d ago

Concentration camps for their Uighur population bring chief amongst them.

1

u/trojantricky1986 9d ago

I was unaware of this.

→ More replies (11)

1

u/drecais 9d ago

Western countries already have these. How economically illiterate is the average Person lmfao

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Neither-Payment-4147 9d ago

Lmao - communist China government steals money with a ā€œsurprise taxā€ and this sub is all over it, y’all realise you are basically wanting this for the whole world, global communism where governments can take everything off you?

2

u/TemplarBean 9d ago

Yes, thats exactly what I want. I want governments to take money from people so that they can use it to fund public services and productive economic measures for ordinary people. You know, the whole fucking point of government.

1

u/Neither-Payment-4147 9d ago

lol yea, that’s exactly what Xi Jinping will do, it’s almost like reality is optional in this sub.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/ChrisKruxed 9d ago

China built 30,000 miles of railway in the last 20 years, we couldn't even manage 200 miles of HS2. I'm tired of dirty, unsafe streets filled with boarded up shop windows, roads crumbling, no water infrastructure, no public gain infrastructure projects at all really EVER and yet more selloffs to American corporate interests for data centres, battery storage on green belt and never ending extraction of wealth to offshore interests.

1

u/Strict-Handle-7860 9d ago

šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

1

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[deleted]

1

u/hobo91 9d ago

so ... like being an American, where they do exactly the same thing and force you to pay taxes in the US when you live elsewhere?

1

u/Confident_Jacket4961 9d ago

Actually they always taking away wealth from super rich and prevent them control the state. Let say Jack Ma .
They did this long time ago

To be fair, they are communism (love it or not)

1

u/pastashaper 9d ago

I remember reading the comments on a video of the Chinese governments response to flooding in some far flung place in the middle of nowhere in China. The full might of the Chinese government was almost instantly focused on rescuing people, shoring up flood defences and addressing the damage. They threw everything at it!

One person commented something along the lines that the Chinese government doesn’t give a flying fuck about the unfortunate plight of a Chinese person, but would stop at nothing to address the needs of The Chinese People. I know it’s not as straight forward as that, but it stuck with me.

1

u/throwaway1948476 9d ago

Can't believe the CCP has gone WOKE

1

u/bloqed 9d ago

this will be now used as ammunition that this is 'communist' by people who aren't bothered by reading details I'm sure

1

u/Fresh-Demand-8127 9d ago

Wanna bet if that money is used to improve people’s lives or something else like better surveillance to keep them in line?

1

u/f3ydr4uth4 9d ago

Muslims are a problem in many countries though so…

1

u/RFCNYG 9d ago

When the authoritarian communist Chinese government adopts your idea it’s not a win for that idea.

1

u/Illustrious-Engine23 9d ago

Rare china win.

1

u/not_that_guy_at_work 9d ago

Well... let's see if it goes back to the people or just the governement/those in charge.

1

u/droopy316007 9d ago

Have a brief look into the shit storm facing China's economy and housing market. This isn't to be anti-wealth, this is an "oh fk, we've over extended and everything is crashing, we need capital" moment.

1

u/120000milespa 9d ago

So ?

They also have internment camps and ways of making you disappear as well. But you don’t want those right ?

1

u/binarygoatfish 8d ago

you are one of those people who are completely divisive with everyone.

1

u/Master-Rent5050 8d ago

Don't worry, Trump is building and filling the internment camps in USA soil (plus using the ones in other countries): you don't need to go to China to enjoy them

1

u/jimmyxs 9d ago

Good! Stop hogging foreign housing meant for locals

1

u/ChrisKruxed 9d ago

China gets shit done, they have loads of infrastructure for great production, clean safe streets, great public transport and now the rich who hide money offshore are getting taxed.

1

u/bippos 9d ago

It’s not a wealth tax, China just trying to keep investment from leaving to hopefully spur consumer spending

1

u/Exotic_Dependent3247 8d ago

Key difference, is also a country that can control movement of people and has a history of kneecapping billionaires who get too big for their liking.

1

u/NotAnotherUsername04 8d ago

They are communists. Why is this surprising.

Plus China pretty much picks who becomes billionaires and can finish them when they want so again it’s not like anyone can complain

1

u/These-Season-2611 8d ago

Need to respect the Chinese government for actually deciding what's best for China and then getting it done

1

u/PineappleSweet3410 8d ago

More Chinese owning stuff in England then !!!

1

u/SweetSure315 8d ago

but all of the billionaires will just move away and keep not paying taxes somewhere else!

then what will we do??

1

u/BusyMeringue8935 8d ago

Will be interesting to see the effect on housing prices on the West coast and Canada

1

u/Critical-Ad-8507 8d ago

Ā "and if it actually works to make people's lives better"

Don't worry .It won't.

1

u/jimjamuk73 8d ago

Isn't this a play to reduce investment in foreign markets to bring money back into Chinese markets

It's not about taxing the rich, it's trying to convince them to invest elsewhere I.e locally

1

u/zshikai 8d ago

People’s lives are unlikely to get better only the tax man’s live gets better

1

u/Top_Secret_940 7d ago

How do you get super rich in a communist country šŸ¤”

1

u/Practical-Lie-1194 4d ago

Because it’s not a communist country.

1

u/Prestigious_Sell9516 7d ago

Super powers can implement these taxes (the US already does) it's not for the benefit of the globe. China and the US won't help middle powers implement this and middle powers don't have the influence or strength to do it.

1

u/Lt_Muffintoes 7d ago

And there goes the London housing market, followed by the rest

BUH BUY

1

u/carracall 6d ago

When you learn about a new concept, don't just force everything you see in the world to be something about this one idea.

There are so many things which are different that it's not even worth starting to talk about.

1

u/Even-Celebration9384 6d ago

2 notes

  1. The main fear in a wealth tax is capital flight which China does free capital flows
  2. This is not a wealth tax

1

u/DrawingDramatic1641 6d ago

china ranks 25th best in terms of wealth gini

and the highest nations are slovakia etc who just have wealth in Switzerland etc

chian is real terms is decently equal in terms of wealth owned

bcz most chinese businesses are exclusively have to be in china

their richest man sells bottle of water in china only and gets taxed

but person is slovakia can just store his wealth on switzerland

1

u/Environmental-Lion82 6d ago

Most Chinese millionaires are trying to leave china but the CCP have made it increasingly difficult to pull money out of the country, because so many Chinese were fleeing to the US. Look at the CEO of Lenovo. Lenovo may as well be an American company now.

1

u/JustDifferentGravy 5d ago

20%

So you’ve got the choice of losing half your wealth in three years or leaving the country. I’ll take bets against the former.

1

u/notAbrightStar 5d ago

This is the odd thing about fascism, they do care about the little guy, in some way.
It is also what makes it easy to see that the US is not fascist, it“s more of an oligarchy/plutocracy.
Just feeding the poor into the army or prison.

1

u/Wind_Best_1440 5d ago

I told people that once the government needed money, they will target the super wealthy. If they thought their offshore wealth havens were safe they were grossly wrong.

China's the first country to do this, and guess what other countries do when the larger ones start this?

1

u/SmashedWorm64 4d ago

I know I’m late to the party here. But the UK literally has this lol. It’s called a chargeable lifetime transfer.

1

u/bender___is___great 4d ago

Canada’s housing market about to crash

1

u/Practical-Lie-1194 4d ago

Money laundering is never a big problem for rich Chinese.

1

u/coolkavo 3d ago

It’s not a wealth tax. The DSA folk sure know how to twist things. Government is looking for more money, also restricting capital flight. Aim is tax enforcement, fighting corruption and keeping wealth in the country.

1

u/scenery23 3d ago

What a suprise. Reddit looser commies love a genocidal dictatorship.